scholarly journals Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Strategy 2021 - Executive summary and rationale for key changes

2021 ◽  
pp. 2102730
Author(s):  
Helen K. Reddel ◽  
Leonard B. Bacharier ◽  
Eric D. Bateman ◽  
Christopher E. Brightling ◽  
Guy G. Brusselle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Severe Asthma ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Skills Training ◽  
Mild Asthma ◽  
Executive Summary ◽  
Global Initiative For Asthma ◽  
Global Initiative ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Beta2 Agonist

The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Strategy Report provides clinicians with an annually updated evidence-based strategy for asthma management and prevention, which can be adapted for local circumstances (e.g., medication availability). This article summarizes key recommendations from GINA 2021, and the evidence underpinning recent changes.GINA recommends that asthma in adults and adolescents should not be treated solely with short-acting beta2-agonist (SABA), because of the risks of SABA-only treatment and SABA overuse, and evidence for benefit of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Large trials show that as- needed combination ICS-formoterol reduces severe exacerbations by >60% in mild asthma compared with SABA alone, with similar exacerbation, symptom, lung function and inflammatory outcomes as daily ICS plus as-needed SABA.Key changes in GINA 2021 include division of the treatment figure for adults and adolescents into two tracks. Track 1 (preferred) has low-dose ICS-formoterol as the reliever at all steps: as-needed only in Steps 1-2 (mild asthma), and with daily maintenance ICS-formoterol (maintenance-and-reliever therapy, MART) in Steps 3-5. Track 2 (alternative) has as-needed SABA across all steps, plus regular ICS (Step 2) or ICS-long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) (Steps 3-5). For adults with moderate-to-severe asthma, GINA makes additional recommendations in Step 5 for add-on long-acting muscarinic antagonists and azithromycin, with add-on biologic therapies for severe asthma. For children 6-11  years, new treatment options are added at Steps 3-4.Across all age-groups and levels of severity, regular personalized assessment, treatment of modifiable risk factors, self-management education, skills training, appropriate medication adjustment and review remain essential to optimize asthma outcomes.

scholarly journals First analysis of the Severe Paediatric Asthma Collaborative in Europe registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 00566-2020
Author(s):  
Norrice M. Liu ◽  
Karin C.L. Carlsen ◽  
Steve Cunningham ◽  
Grazia Fenu ◽  
Louise J. Fleming ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Asthma Control ◽  
Severe Asthma ◽  
Suboptimal Control ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Asthma Control Test ◽  
European Respiratory Society ◽  
Paediatric Asthma ◽  
Global Initiative For Asthma ◽  
Global Initiative ◽  
Long Acting

New biologics are being continually developed for paediatric asthma, but it is unclear whether there are sufficient numbers of children in Europe with severe asthma and poor control to recruit to trials needed for registration. To address these questions, the European Respiratory Society funded the Severe Paediatric Asthma Collaborative in Europe (SPACE), a severe asthma registry. We report the first analysis of the SPACE registry, which includes data from 10 paediatric respiratory centres across Europe.Data from 80 children with a clinical diagnosis of severe asthma who were receiving both high-dose inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting β2-agonist were entered into the registry between January 2019 and January 2020. Suboptimal control was defined by either asthma control test, or Global Initiative for Asthma criteria, or ≥2 severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months, or a combination.Overall, 62 out of 80 (77%) children had suboptimal asthma control, of whom 29 were not prescribed a biologic. However, in 24 there was an option for starting a licensed biologic. 33 children with suboptimal control were prescribed a biologic (omalizumab (n=24), or mepolizumab (n=7), or dupilumab (n=2)), and for 29 there was an option to switch to a different biologic.We conclude that the SPACE registry provides data that will support the planning of studies of asthma biologics. Not all children on biologics achieve good asthma control, and there is need for new trial designs addressing biologic switching.

scholarly journals Comparing LAMA with LABA and LTRA as add-on therapies in primary care asthma management

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Kaplan ◽  
J. Mark FitzGerald ◽  
Roland Buhl ◽  
Christian Vogelberg ◽  
Eckard Hamelmann
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Lung Function ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Asthma Management ◽  
Global Initiative For Asthma ◽  
Control Asthma ◽  
Global Initiative ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract The Global Initiative for Asthma recommends a stepwise approach to adjust asthma treatment to the needs of individual patients; inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) remain the core pharmacological treatment. However, many patients remain poorly controlled, and evidence-based algorithms to decide on the best order and rationale for add-on therapies are lacking. We explore the challenges of asthma management in primary care and review outcomes from randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses comparing the long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) tiotropium with long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) or leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) as add-on to ICS in patients with asthma. In adults, LAMAs and LABAs provide a greater improvement in lung function than LTRAs as add-on to ICS. In children, results were positive and comparable between therapies, but data are scarce. This information could aid decision-making in primary care, supporting the use of add-on therapy to ICS to help improve lung function, control asthma symptoms and prevent exacerbations.

scholarly journals Tiotropium bromide: additional options for the treatment of bronchial asthma

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 67-74
Author(s):  
O M Kurbacheva ◽  
M E Dyneva
Keyword(s):  
Bronchial Asthma ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Biological Properties ◽  
Additional Treatment ◽  
Tiotropium Bromide ◽  
Inhalation Therapy ◽  
Global Initiative For Asthma ◽  
Successful Control ◽  
Global Initiative ◽  
Long Acting

Bronchial asthma (BA) is one of the most common chronic diseases, characterized by airway inflammation and bronchospasm. Symptoms of BA are wheezing, shortness of breath, a feeling of constriction in the chest and cough, the frequency and severity of which vary greatly over time. Today studies of BA phenotypes allow selecting treatment depending on the particular pathogenesis of each phenotype individually, thereby helping to achieve control, which is the main goal of BA therapy. However, it is necessary to take into account the peculiarities of airway innervation, since an increased parasympathetic tone is characteristics of all BA phenotypes and plays an important role in the development of bronchoconstriction and inflammation. Therefore, tiotropium bromide, which is a long-acting blocker of muscarinic cholinergic receptors, is one of the main bronchodilators in the treatment of BA. It blocks bronchoconstriction, hypersecretion and swelling of the mucous membrane of the airway, which in turn prevents the progression of inflammation, and the prolonged action of tiotropium bromide, which allows it to be used once a day helps to achieve control of asthma in addition to basic inhalation therapy - inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) long-acting P2-agonists (LABA). According to GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma), tiotropium bromide is recommended as an additional treatment, starting from step 4, and in accordance with the Russian Federal Clinical Guidelines for Bronchial Asthma - from step 3. Currently, according to clinical studies, much is known about the mechanisms of action and biological properties of tiotropium bromide, which made it possible to substantiate the needs for its administration to patients with BA regardless of its phenotype. This strategy will contribute to a more successful control of BA considering risk factors and comorbidity, thereby reducing needs of increasing ICS dose.

The Management of Mild Asthma

2020 ◽  
pp. 2003051
Author(s):  
Paul M. O'Byrne ◽  
Helen K. Reddel ◽  
Richard Beasley
Keyword(s):  
Severe Asthma ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Symptom Relief ◽  
Rapid Onset ◽  
Mild Asthma ◽  
Asthma Exacerbations ◽  
Reliever Medication ◽  
Asthma Patients ◽  
Long Acting

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have been recommended as a maintenance treatment, either alone or together with long-acting inhaled β2-agonists, for all asthma patients. Short acting β2-agonists (SABA) are rapid onset bronchodilators, which provide symptom relief, but have no anti-inflammatory properties, yet are the most widely used as-needed reliever treatment for asthma, and often the only treatment prescribed. Asthma patients can find adhering to daily preventative medication with ICS difficult and will often revert to using as-needed SABA as their only treatment, increasing their risk of exacerbations. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the efficacy of reliever medications that contain an ICS when compared to SABA as a reliever, or to maintenance ICS and SABA as reliever, in mild asthma patients.Nine studies were identified which have evaluated the use of ICS as a component of an as-needed reliever in patients with mild asthma. Four of the most recent studies compared the combination of ICS/formoterol to SABA as reliever.An ICS containing reliever medication was superior to SABA as reliever alone, and was equivalent to maintenance ICS and SABA as reliever, particularly in reducing risks of severe asthma exacerbations, in studies which compared these reliever options.SABAs should not be used as a reliever without ICS. The concern about patients with mild asthma not being adherent to maintenance ICS, supports a recommendation that ICS/formoterol should be considered as a treatment option instead of maintenance ICS, to avoid the risk of patients reverting to SABA alone.

The relationship between BMI, leptin, leptin receptors (LepR) and Foxp3+ Tregs cells in women with asthma

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 277-284
Author(s):  
Łukasz Kraszula ◽  
Makandjou-Ola Eusebio ◽  
Anna Jasińska ◽  
Maciej Kupczyk ◽  
Piotr Kuna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Severe Asthma ◽  
Leptin Receptor ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Soluble Receptor ◽  
Leptin Receptors ◽  
Global Initiative For Asthma ◽  
Moderate Disease ◽  
Global Initiative ◽  
And Control ◽  
The Relationship

The aim of this study was evaluation whether there is an association between BMI, leptin and its soluble receptor, the expression of FoxP3 in CD4+ pTreg in women with severe asthma. Materials and methods. The study included thirty women with asthma: 17 patients with severe and 13 with mild-moderate disease. The control group comprised of 25 healthy women. Asthma was diagnosed in accordance with the Global Initiative For Asthma guidelines (GINA 2014). The phenotype of CD4+CD25highCD127lowFoxp3+CD152+ cells was evaluated by multicolor flow cytometry. The concentration of leptin and its soluble receptor were determined using an immunoenzymatic method (ELISA). Results. It has been shown significantly increased leptin concentration in the group of women with severe asthma compared with mild-moderate asthma and control group (p <0.05). The concentration of the leptin receptor significantly increased (p <0.05) in women with severe asthma compared with control group. There were no differences in percentage of CD4+FoxP3+ and CD4+CD25highCD127low- FoxP3+CD152+ subsets after leptin stimulation in all tested groups. Conclusions. Our results don’t confirm the direct effect of leptin on the CD4+ pTreg cells and the expression of FoxP3 in these cells, in tested groups.

Diagnosis and Management of Severe Asthma

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (01) ◽  
pp. 091-099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kian Fan Chung
Keyword(s):  
Severe Asthma ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Immunoglobulin E ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Blood Eosinophil ◽  
Exhaled Breath ◽  
Eosinophilic Asthma ◽  
Severe Eosinophilic Asthma ◽  
Asthma Patients ◽  
Long Acting

AbstractSevere therapy-resistant asthma has been defined as “asthma which requires treatment with high dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) plus a second controller (and/or systemic corticosteroids) to prevent it from becoming ‘uncontrolled’ or which remains ‘uncontrolled’ despite this therapy”. Patients who usually present with ‘difficult-to-treat asthma’ should first be assessed to determine whether he/she has asthma with the exclusion of other diagnoses and if so, whether the asthma can be classified as severe therapy-resistant. This necessitates an assessment of adherence to medications, confounding factors, and comorbidities. Increasingly, management of severe therapy-resistant asthma will be helped by the determination of phenotypes to optimize responses to existing and new therapies. Severe asthma patients are usually on a combination of high dose ICS and long-acting β-agonist (LABA) and, in addition, are often on a maintenance dose of oral corticosteroids. Phenotyping can be informed by measuring blood eosinophil counts and the level of nitric oxide in exhaled breath, and the use of sputum granulocytic counts. Severe allergic asthma and severe eosinophilic asthma are two defined phenotypes for which there are efficacious targeted biologic therapies currently available, namely anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) and anti-interleukin (IL)-5 antibodies, respectively. Further progress will be realized with the definition of noneosinophilic or non-T2 phenotypes. It will be important for patients with severe asthma to be ultimately investigated and managed in specialized severe asthma centers.

Pediatric asthma: Principles and treatment

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 389-392
Author(s):  
Ashley L. Devonshire ◽  
Rajesh Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Skin Prick Testing ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Disease Process ◽  
Symptomatic Improvement ◽  
Cigarette Smoke Exposure ◽  
Upper Respiratory Infection ◽  
Children With Asthma ◽  
Upper Respiratory ◽  
Long Acting

Approximately one-half of children with asthma present with symptoms before 3 years of age. The typical history describes recurrent episodes of wheezing and/or cough triggered by a viral upper respiratory infection (URI), activity, or changes in weather. When symptoms occur after a viral URI, children with asthma often take longer than the usual week to fully recover from their respiratory symptoms. Wheezing and coughing during exercise or during laughing or crying, and episodes triggered in the absence of infection suggest asthma. A trial of bronchodilator medication should show symptomatic improvement. The goal of asthma therapy is to keep children “symptom free” by preventing chronic symptoms, maintaining lung function, and allowing for normal daily activities. Avoidance of triggers identified by a history, such as second-hand cigarette smoke exposure, and allergens identified by skin-prick testing can significantly reduce symptoms. According to the 2007 National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) report, if impairment symptoms are present for >2 days/week or 2 nights/month, then the disease process is characterized as persistent, and, in all age groups, inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are recommended as the preferred daily controller therapy. Montelukast is approved for children ages ≥ 12 months and is often used for its ease of daily oral dosing. Long-acting beta-2 adrenergic agonists should only be used in combination with an ICS. For more-severe or difficult-to-control phenotypes, biologic therapy has been developed, which targets the type of inflammation present.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document