Comparison of extubation outcome after spontaneous breathing trials with T-piece and pressure support ventilation in patients with expiratory flow limitation

Author(s):  
yanisa kluanwan ◽  
Napplika Kongpolprom
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanisa Kluanwan ◽  
Napplika Kongpolprom

Abstract Background: Expiratory flow limitation (EFL) is an inability to exceed a certain flow regardless of the pressure exerted, which appears in 60% of patients with extubation failure. However, an appropriate weaning method for the patients with EFL remains unknown. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate an effect of different techniques of spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) on a success rate of extubation in the patients with EFL. Methods: We conducted a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial comparing between 30-minute pressure support ventilation (PSV) and 30-minute T-piece in ventilated patients with EFL who got ready to wean. The primary outcome was successful extubation during a 72-hour post-extubation period. Secondary outcomes were a reintubation rate within 7 days, time to reintubation, and a SBT success rate. Results: A total of 99 ventilated patients with EFL consisting of male (50.5%) with the median age of 70 [23] years were recruited. The most common cause of acute respiratory failure was intrapulmonary cause (68.7%). The eligible patients were randomized into 2 groups with a ratio of 1:1. The success rate of extubation during the 72-hour period in the PSV group was non-inferior to the T-piece group: 82% and 81.63%, respectively (95%CI -0.148 to 0.156, p=0.0475). There was also non-inferiority in the reintubation rate within 7 days (22.9% in the PSV group VS 15.2% in the T-piece group; 95%CI -0.081 to 0.235, p=0.005) and the SBT success rate (96% in the PSV group VS 93.9% in the T-piece group; 95%CI -0.065 to 0.108, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the median time to reintubation between these 2 groups (55 [95.5] hours in PSV VS 25.33 [48] hours in the T-piece group, p=0.683). Conclusions: Among patients with EFL, the 30-minute SBT with PSV was non-inferior to the T-piece SBT in terms of the successful extubation during the 72-hour period, successful SBT, and reintubation rate within 7 days. This was the first study demonstrating that the different techniques of SBT did not affect the weaning outcomes in the patients with EFL.


1997 ◽  
Vol 156 (2) ◽  
pp. 459-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANDRÉS ESTEBAN ◽  
INMACULADA ALÍA ◽  
FEDERICO GORDO ◽  
RAFAEL FERNÁNDEZ ◽  
JOSÉ F. SOLSONA ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 61 (12) ◽  
pp. 1693-1703 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. S. Pellegrini ◽  
R. B. Moraes ◽  
J. G. Maccari ◽  
R. P. de Oliveira ◽  
A. Savi ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Saad El-din El-beleidy ◽  
Asser Abd EL-Hamied Khattab ◽  
Seham Awad El-Sherbini ◽  
Hebatalla Fadel Al-gebaly

Background. Automatic tube compensation (ATC) has been developed to overcome the imposed work of breathing due to artificial airways during spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs). Objectives. This study aimed to assess extubation outcome after an SBT (spontaneous breathing trial) with ATC compared with pressure support ventilation (PSV) and to determine the risk factors for extubation failure. Methods. Patients ready for extubation were randomly assigned to two-hour spontaneous breathing trial with either ATC or pressure support ventilation. Results. In the ATC group (), 11 (65%) patients passed the SBT with subsequent extubation failure (9%). While in PSV group (), 10 (53%) patients passed the SBT with subsequent extubation failure (10%). This represented a positive predictive value for ATC of 91% and PSV of 90% (). Five (83%) of the patients who failed the SBT in ATC group were reintubated. This represented a higher negative predictive value for ATC of 83% than for PSV which was 56%. None of the assessed risk factors were independently associated with extubation failure including failed trial. Conclusion. ATC was equivalent to PSV in predicting patients with successful extubation. A trial failure in ATC group is associated with but does not definitely predict extubation failure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document