Correlation between Handgrip Strength and Rapid Shallow Breathing Index for Assessment of Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation

Background. Assessment of weaning from mechanical ventilation (MV) is an important process. Rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) is a standard tool to evaluate a patient’s readiness before the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). Handgrip strength (HGS) is an alternative method for assessment of respiratory muscle strength. Relationship between HGS and RSBI has not been explored. This study aimed to determine the correlation between HGS and RSBI to predict successful extubation in mechanically ventilated patients. Methods. A prospective study was conducted in screened 120 patients requiring MV with tracheal intubation >48 h. HGS was performed at 48 h after intubation, 10 min before and 30 min after SBT, and 1 h after extubation. RSBI was performed at 10 min before SBT. Results. A total of 93 patients (58% men) were included in the final analysis. Mean age was 71.6 ± 15.2 years. Patients admitted in general medical wards were 84.9%. APACHE II score was 13.5 ± 4.7. Most patients were intubated from pneumonia (39.8%). Weaning failure was 6.5%. The main result shows that HGS was negatively correlated with RSBI (regression coefficient −0.571, P < 0.001 ). The equation for predicting RSBI, derived from the linear regression model, was predicted RSBI (breaths/min/L) = 39.285 + (age ∗ 0.138)–(HGS ∗ 0.571). Conclusions. HGS had significantly negative correlation with RSBI for assessment of weaning from MV. A prospective study of the HGS cutoff value is needed to investigate the difference between patients who succeeded and those who failed extubation. This trial is registered with TCTR20180323004.

Validation of rapid shallow breathing index displayed by the ventilator compared to the standard technique in patients with readiness for weaning

Background Rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) is the most commonly used parameter for predicting weaning outcome. Measurement of RSBI by Wright spirometer (RSBIstandard) is the standard method in routine clinical practice. Data specific to the accuracy and reliability of the RSBI value displayed by the ventilator (RSBIvent) are scarce. Accordingly, this study aimed to evaluate the association between the average value of RSBIvent at different time points and RSBIstandard, and to assess the accuracy and reliability of these two RSBI measurement techniques. Methods This prospective cohort study included mechanically ventilated patients who were ready to wean. At the beginning of spontaneous breathing trial using the flow-by method, RSBI was measured by two different techniques at the same time, including: (1) Wright spirometer (breathing frequency/average tidal volume in 1 min) (RSBIstandard), and (2) the values displayed on the ventilator at 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 s (RSBIvent). Results Forty-seven patients were enrolled. The RSBIvent value was significantly higher than the RSBIstandard value for every comparison. According to Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the average value of RSBI from 5 time points (0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 s) showed the best correlation with the standard technique (r = 0.76 [P < 0.001], and ICC = 0.79 [95% CI 0.61–0.88], respectively). Bland–Altman plot also showed the best agreement between RSBIstandard and the RSBIvent value averaged among 5 time points (mean difference − 17.1 breaths/min/L). Conclusions We found that the ventilator significantly overestimates the RSBI value compared to the standard technique by Wright spirometer. The average RSBIvent value among 5 time points (0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 s) was found to best correlate with RSBIstandard.

The Role of Diaphragmatic Rapid Shallow Breathing Index and Maximum Inspiratory Pressure in Predicting Outcome of Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation

Background Mechanical ventilation is the defining event of intensive care unit (ICU) management. It is a lifesaving intervention in patients with acute respiratory failure and whose spontaneous ventilation is inadequate for subsequent development of life threatening hypoxia and/or respiratory acidosis. Many physicians simply look at the patient’s ability to tolerate a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) without distress through the respiratory rate (RR) and TV during the SBT. The RR/TV ratio, i.e., the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), one of the most used clinical indices to predict weaning outcome, reflects the balance between mechanical load posed on the inspiratory muscles and the inspiratory muscles ability to face it during the weaning attempt. However, RSBI was found to have both variable sensitivity and specificity for predicting weaning outcome. Although the diaphragm plays a fundamental role in generating TV in healthy subjects, if the diaphragmatic efficiency is impaired the accessory inspiratory muscles mild contribute to the ventilation for a limited period of time, for example during a SBT. However, since they are by far less efficient and more fatigable than the diaphragm, their exhaustion was likely lead to weaning failure in subsequent hours. Hence, the contribution of the accessory muscles to TV could compromise the diagnostic accuracy of the RSBI by masking the underlying diaphragmatic dysfunction. Aim of the Work To assess the accuracy of Diaphragmatic Rapid shallow breathing index and Maximum inspiratory pressure in predicting the outcome of weaning from mechanical ventilation. Patients and Methods The study was conducted at Ain Shams University Hospitals over 6 months on Patients who were mechanically ventilated for more than 48 hrs who were ready for weaning. Inclusion Criteria Patients intubated & mechanically ventilated for more than 48 hrs. Patients at their first SBT.Patients with adequate cough reflex. Patients fulfilling criteria of readiness for weaning from mechanical ventilation after resolution of cause of respiratory failure: Patients with score ranging between -1 and +1 on the Richmond Agitation and sedation scale (RASS). Exclusion criteria Age &lt; 18 yrs. Patients with thoracotomy, pneumothorax, or pneumomediastinum. Patients with presence of flail chest or rib fractures. Patients with neuromuscular disease. Use of muscle-paralyzing agents within 48 hours before the study. History or new detection of paralysis or paradoxical movement of a single hemi diaphragm on diaphragmatic ultrasonography. Pregnant females. Unconscious noncooperative patients. Patients with intra-abdominal hypertension, Long term steroid therapy. Results I- Distribution of the studied patients regarding final outcome. II- Demographic data. III. Causes of MV. IV- Days on MV. V- Patients’ data and characteristics before start of weaning trial. VI- SBT Ventilator Breathing pattern after 30 min. VII- Study predictors. Conclusion D-RSBI is a new and promising tool that is superior to the traditional RSBI in predicting weaning outcome also MIP provides appreciated data with greater accuracy to assess inspiratory muscle strength and predicting weaning success in mechanically ventilated patients. Recommendations We could recommend the measurement of MIP and DRSBI as weaning predictors should be an integral part of evaluation of patients plan for weaning from MV. All intensivists should be acquitted with the use of U/S in the evaluation of diaphragmatic function.

Use of the Change in Weaning Parameters as a Predictor of Successful Re-Extubation

Objective: Weaning parameters are well studied in patients undergoing first time extubation. Fewer data exists to guide re-extubation of patients who failed their first extubation attempt. It is reasonable to postulate that improved weaning parameters between the first and second extubation attempt would lead to improved rates of re-extubation success. To investigate, we studied a cohort of patients who failed their first extubation attempt and underwent a second attempt at extubation. We hypothesized that improvement in weaning parameters between the first and the second extubation attempt is associated with successful reextubation. Interventions: Rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), vital capacity (VC), and the blood partial pressure of CO2 (PaCO2) were measured and recorded in the medical record prior to extubation along with demographic information. We examined the relationship between the change in extubation and re-extubation weaning parameters and re-extubation success. Measurements and Main results: A total of 1283 adult patients were included. All weaning parameters obtained prior to re-extubation differed between those who were successful and those who required a second reintubation. Those with reextubation success had slightly lower PaCO2 values (39.5 ± 7.4 mmHg vs. 41.6 ± 9.1 mmHg, p = 0.0045) and about 13% higher vital capacity volumes (1021 ± 410 mL vs. 907 ± 396 mL, p = 0.0093). Lower values for RSBI (53 ± 32 breaths/min/L vs. 69 ± 42 breaths/min/L, p < 0.001) and MIP (−41 ± 12 cmH2O vs. −38 ± 13 cm H2O), p = 0.0225) were seen in those with re-extubation success. Multivariable logistical regression demonstrates lack of independent associated between the change in parameters between the 2 attempts and re-extubation success. Conclusions: The relationship between the changes in extubation parameters through successive attempts is driven primarily by the value obtained immediately prior to re-extubation. These findings do not support waiting for an improvement in extubation parameters to extubate patients who failed a first attempt at extubation if extubation parameters are compatible with success.