scholarly journals Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated interstitial lung disease: a review

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (162) ◽  
pp. 210123
Author(s):  
Suha Kadura ◽  
Ganesh Raghu
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody ◽  
Antibody Testing ◽  
Systemic Involvement ◽  
Baseline Evaluation ◽  
Number Of Publications

Over the past three decades, an increasing number of publications have reported the association between interstitial lung disease (ILD) and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) or ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). With this increased awareness, we have reviewed the literature to date and provide an update in this narrative review. The vast majority of cases of ILD have been shown to be in the setting of positive anti-myeloperoxidase antibody and can be present in up to 45% of patients of microscopic polyangiitis, though cases of ILD associated with proteinase 3 ANCA have rarely been reported. Pulmonary fibrosis and ANCA positivity can occur with or without systemic involvement. The pathogenetic mechanisms establishing the relationship between ANCA and the development of pulmonary fibrosis remain unclear. Histologic and radiographic features of ANCA-ILD most commonly reveal usual interstitial pneumonia or non-specific interstitial pneumonia patterns, though other atypical features such as bronchiolitis have been described. ILD in the setting of AAV has been associated with worse outcomes, and thus early identification and treatment in these patients is appropriate. We advocate that ANCA antibody testing be performed as a baseline evaluation in patients presenting with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. Suggested treatment of ANCA-ILD includes immunosuppression and/or antifibrotic agents, though supporting data and clinical trials to substantiate use of these therapies are needed.

AB0528 CHARACTERIZATION OF ANTI-MPO POSITIVE INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE. CLINICAL-SEROLOGIC AND RADIOLOGIC FEATURES AND SURVIVAL

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1561-1562
Author(s):  
G. Cassone ◽  
G. Dei ◽  
G. Sambataro ◽  
A. Manfredi ◽  
S. Cerri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Pulmonary Involvement ◽  
Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies ◽  
Anca Associated Vasculitis ◽  
Radiologic Features

Background:Prevalence of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) in patient with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) ranges from 1 to 35%, mainly anti-MPO. The presence of ANCA positivity seems to be a poorer prognostic factor in patient with IPF, and some of these patients will develop clinical vasculitis (7-23%).Unfortunately, the majority of the available studies on this topic are retrospective and the real natural history of the disease remains poorly understood.Objectives:Aim of the study was to investigate the clinical, serological and radiologic features of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and positivity for anti-MPO, and to evaluate the survival of this population compared with IPF patients.Methods:We retrospectively analysed 30 patients with ILD and anti-MPO antibodies, without diagnosis of vasculitis, from 3 different rheumatology-pulmonology Italian Center.For each patient, clinical, radiologic and serological data were evaluated. Treatments were also collected, both immunosuppressants or antifibrotic agents.Finally, survival of ILD-MPO patients and of 90 unselected idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients was compared.Results:Thirty patients were enrolled in the study (see table for the characteristics of the patients).Fibrosing pneumonia was described in 73.3% of patients (usual interstitial pneumonia [UIP] in 19 patients), and 10 patients (33.3%) received antifibrotic drugs, all with UIP pattern. Of interest, 7 patients were treated with immunosuppressants (azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil), independently by the ILD pattern and 21 (70%) low dosage of steroids.After a median period of 23.5 months (range 11-111), 7 patients developed an ANCA associated vasculitis, while other 3 developed other rheumatic diseases.Finally, when compared with IPF, ILD-MPO patients had a better survival (81.2%±0.9 vs 54.7±0.7 for ILD-MPO and IPF, respectively; p=0.045)Conclusion:ILD positive for anti-MPO antibodies are still a not definite condition. We need larger population to identify possible markers for the evolution in an ANCA associated vasculitis, to define the prognosis of disease and the better therapeutic approach.References: :[1]Mohammad AJ, et al. Pulmonary Involvement in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies (ANCA)-associated Vasculitis: The Influence of ANCA Subtype. J Rheumatol. 2017;44:1458-67Table.Serological, clinical and radiological features of anti-MPO + interstitial lung diseaseNumber30Males/female15/15Median age (years + IQR)68 (17)Median follow-up (months + IQR)39.5 (61)Smoke36.70%ILD pattern Usual interstitial pneumonia63.30% Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia16.70% Hipersensitivity pneumonia10% Other fibrosing pneumonia10%Median FVC (% + IQR)83 (23)Median DLCO (% + IQR)53 (28)Clinical features Raynaud’s phenomenon7.70% Sicca syndrome0 Arthralgias20% Arthritis3.40%Serology Antinuclear antibodies30.80% Anti-extractable nuclear antibodies (ENA)8% Anti-SSA4% Rheumatoid factor21.40%Therapy Immusuppressants23.30% Anti-fibrotic drugs33.30%Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Up-to-Date Information on Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

2015 ◽  
Vol 9s1 ◽  
pp. CCRPM.S23289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takafumi Suda
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Acute Exacerbation ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Radiological Patterns

Pulmonary involvement is common in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and affects all the components of the lung. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the most predominant pulmonary manifestation and has been identified as the main cause of morbidity and mortality in RA. Clinically significant RA-ILD occurs in approximately 10% of RA patients. Several risk factors, such as old age, male gender, and smoking, have been reported to date. Histologically, the proportion of the usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern is higher in RA-ILD than in ILD associated with other connective tissue diseases, and RA-ILD also shows nonspecific interstitial pneumonia and organizing pneumonia patterns. High-resolution computed tomography scans are highly predictive of the histological UIP pattern with a specificity of 96%-100%. Acute exacerbation, which is the acute deterioration of the respiratory status characterized by newly developed bilateral infiltrates with unknown etiologies, has been reported in RA-ILD. Although acute exacerbation of RA-ILD has high mortality, similar to that of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, its incidence is lower in RA-ILD than in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. A consensus treatment has not yet been established. Current therapeutic regimens typically include corticosteroids with or without cytotoxic agents. Recent large longitudinal studies reported that the prognosis of RA-ILD was poor with a median survival of 2.6-3.0 years. Furthermore, histological and/or radiological patterns, such as UIP or non-UIP, have significant prognostic implications. RA-ILD patients with histological or radiological UIP patterns have poorer prognoses than those with non-UIP patterns. This review assessed the characteristics of RA-ILD by overviewing recent studies in the field and focused on the clinical significance of histological and/or radiological patterns in RA-ILD.

Diagnostic Approach to Advanced Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease: Bringing Together Clinical, Radiologic, and Histologic Clues

2016 ◽  
Vol 141 (7) ◽  
pp. 901-915 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon T. Larsen ◽  
Maxwell L. Smith ◽  
Brett M. Elicker ◽  
Jessica M. Fernandez ◽  
Guillermo A. Arbo-Oze de Morvil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Data Sources ◽  
Advanced Fibrosis ◽  
Diagnostic Dilemma ◽  
End Stage

Context.— Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a distinctive clinicopathologic entity and the most common form of progressive diffuse lung scarring in older adults. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis manifests histopathologically as the usual interstitial pneumonia pattern. The usual interstitial pneumonia pattern is distinguished by geographically and temporally heterogeneous fibrosis that is peripherally accentuated, often with honeycombing and traction bronchiectasis. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is not the only disease that leads to end-stage lung fibrosis, however, and several other entities may also cause advanced fibrosis. Surgical lung biopsies often present a diagnostic dilemma when they show clear evidence of advanced fibrosis, but the clinical, imaging, and/or histopathologic subcharacteristics suggest something other than IPF. Objective.— To address this dilemma, we review several other fibrotic lung diseases, including connective tissue disease–associated interstitial lung disease, chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, advanced pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis, end-stage pulmonary sarcoidosis, Erdheim-Chester disease, Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome, and others, detailing their clinical, radiologic, and histopathologic attributes and emphasizing similarities to and differences from IPF. Data Sources.— Data sources comprised published peer-reviewed literature and personal experience of the authors. Conclusions.— Often, clues in the lung biopsy may offer the first suggestion of a fibrotic lung disease other than IPF, and accurate classification is important for prognosis, treatment, and the development of future therapies.

scholarly journals Interstitial Lung Disease and Diffuse Alveolar Hemorrhage, the Two Key Pulmonary Manifestations in Microscopic Polyangiitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 255-262
Author(s):  
Min Jung Kim ◽  
Kichul Shin
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Microscopic Polyangiitis ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody ◽  
Diffuse Alveolar Hemorrhage ◽  
Alveolar Hemorrhage ◽  
Pulmonary Manifestations

Microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) is an antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)‒associated necrotizing vasculitis, which mainly affects small vessels in various organs, especially the lungs. The two key pulmonary manifestations, interstitial lung disease (ILD) and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH), increase the morbidity and death rate of patients with MPA. ILD is more common in MPA than in other ANCA-associated vasculitis subsets and is primarily associated with myeloperoxidase-ANCA. Unlike alveolar hemorrhage due to pulmonary capillaritis, ILD can initially manifest as isolated pulmonary fibrosis. Of note, its most frequent radiographic pattern is the usual interstitial pneumonia pattern, similar to the characteristic pattern seen in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. In this review we present the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and radiographic and histopathologic features of ILD and DAH in MPA. We also briefly summarize the outcome and therapeutic options for the two conditions.

scholarly journals Clinical diagnosis of patients subjected to surgical lung biopsy with a probable usual interstitial pneumonia pattern on high-resolution computed tomography

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina Celia Carlos Tibana ◽  
Maria Raquel Soares ◽  
Karin Mueller Storrer ◽  
Gustavo de Souza Portes Meirelles ◽  
Katia Hidemi Nishiyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Clinical Diagnosis ◽  
Lung Biopsy ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
High Resolution Computed Tomography ◽  
Surgical Lung Biopsy

Abstract Background Usual interstitial pneumonia can present with a probable pattern on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), but the probability of identifying usual interstitial pneumonia by surgical lung biopsy in such cases remains controversial. We aimed to determine the final clinical diagnosis in patients with a probable usual interstitial pneumonia pattern on HRCT who were subjected to surgical lung biopsy. Methods HRCT images were assessed and categorized by three radiologists, and tissue slides were evaluated by two pathologists, all of whom were blinded to the clinical findings. The final clinical diagnosis was accomplished via a multidisciplinary discussion. Patients with a single layer of honeycombing located outside of the lower lobes on HRCT were not excluded. Results A total of 50 patients were evaluated. The most common final clinical diagnosis was fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (38.0%) followed by idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (24.0%), interstitial lung disease ascribed to gastroesophageal reflux disease (12.0%) and familial interstitial lung disease (10.0%). In the group without environmental exposure (n = 22), 10 patients had a final clinical diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (45.5%). Irrespective of the final clinical diagnosis, by multivariate Cox analysis, patients with honeycombing, dyspnoea and fibroblastic foci on surgical lung biopsy had a high risk of death. Conclusions The most common disease associated with a probable usual interstitial pneumonia pattern on HRCT is fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis followed by idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and interstitial lung disease ascribed to gastroesophageal reflux disease. In patients without environmental exposure, the frequencies of usual interstitial pneumonia and a final clinical diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis are not sufficiently high to obviate the indications for surgical lung biopsy.

scholarly journals Interstitial Lung Disease and Anti-Myeloperoxidase Antibodies: Not a Simple Association

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 2548
Author(s):  
Marco Sebastiani ◽  
Fabrizio Luppi ◽  
Gianluca Sambataro ◽  
Diego Castillo Villegas ◽  
Stefania Cerri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Rheumatic Disease ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Clinical History ◽  
High Resolution Computed Tomography ◽  
Function Testing ◽  
And Diffusion

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA), mainly anti-myeloperoxidase (MPO) antibodies, have been frequently identified in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, their role remains unclear, and only 7–23% of these patients develops clinically overt vasculitis. We aimed to investigate the clinical, serological, and radiological features and prognosis of anti-MPO-positive interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients. Fifty-eight consecutive patients firstly referred for idiopathic interstitial pneumonia and showing serological positivity of anti-MPO antibodies were retrospectively enrolled. For each patient, clinical data, lung function testing, chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) pattern, and survival were recorded. Thirteen patients developed a rheumatic disease during a median follow-up of 39 months. Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) was the most frequent ILD pattern, significantly influencing the patients’ survival. In fact, while the 52-week survival of the overall population was 71.4 ± 7.5%, significantly higher than IPF, survivals of anti-MPO patients with UIP pattern and IPF were similar. Forced vital capacity and diffusion lung capacity for CO significantly declined in 37.7 and 41.5% of cases, respectively, while disease progression at chest HRCT was observed in 45.2%. A careful clinical history and evaluation should always be performed in ILD patients with anti-MPO antibodies to quickly identify patients who are developing a systemic rheumatic disease.

scholarly journals SAT0529 CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND TREATMENT PATTERNS IN A PATIENT GROUP WITH INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE.

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1222.2-1222
Author(s):  
R. Ortega Castro ◽  
P. S. Laura ◽  
F. U. Pilar ◽  
J. Calvo Gutierrez ◽  
A. Requejo-Jimenez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Smoking Habit ◽  
Inflammatory Myopathy ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Common Symptom ◽  
Radiological Pattern ◽  
Mechanic’S Hands

Background:Diffuse interstitial lung disease (ILD) is frequently associated with connective tissue diseases (CTD) and is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in these patients. Recently, the concept of Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features (IPAF) has been defined to characterize ILD associated with systemic manifestations limited to subtle serological and clinical autoimmune abnormalities and not fulfilling the international criteria for the diagnosis of a given CTD.Objectives:The objective of this study is to describe the clinical, serological and radiological characteristics, as well as the treatment patterns of patients with ILD referred to a Rheumatology Service for suspected CTDMethods:Observational, cross-sectional study of 43 patients with ILD referred for evaluation to the medical consultation of CTD of the Rheumatology service at the Reina Sofía Hospital. Patients were classified as patients with defined CTD, patient with IPAF and patients with other types of pneumopathy. We conducted a descriptive study of all patients and compared the clinical-analytical-radiological characteristics and treatment patterns of the first two groups.Results:Of the 43 patients, 67.40% were women with a mean age at diagnosis of 65.65 (10.42) years and 53.50% of smoking patientsOf the total of patients, 16 (37.2%) were included in the CTD group, 17 (39.5%) met criteria for IPAF and 10 (23.3%) had another type of pneumopathy.In the CTD group scleroderma was the most frequent disease (6/16), followed by inflammatory myopathy (4/16), Sjögren’s syndrome (3/16), rheumatoid arthritis (2/16) and polymyalgia rheumatic (1/16). In this group of patients, the most common symptom was Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) (7/16), followed by arthritis (7/16) and mechanic’s hands (3/16). Regarding the most frequently antibodies were ANA (100%), anti-RO (41.7%), anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (30%) and rheumatoid factor (RF) (28.6%).In patients with IPAF, as in the CTD group, the most observed clinical criterion was RP (5/17), followed by arthritis (1/17) and mechanic’s hands (1/17). Among the serological criteria the most common antibodies were ANA (100%), followed by anti-RO (33.3%), anti-RNA synthetase (28.6%) and RF (22.2%).Regarding the radiological pattern, in both groups the most frequent was nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, followed by the indeterminate pattern and usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) in third place. There were no significant differences by gender and age, between the group of CTD and IPAF, observing in both groups a predominance of women with a similar mean age, being the upper smoking habit in the IPAF group (70.6% vs 31.5%, p= 0.02). Regarding the treatment used, the use of immunosuppressants (IS) was more frequent in CTD group (56.3% vs 11.8%, p = 0.007).Conclusion:The clinical-serological and radiological characteristics were similar among patients with IPAF and CTD, which supports the notion of a similar pathophysiology in both groups. In our cohort patients with CTD received IS more frequently than IPAF group, however, future work would be necessary to assess whether the response to treatment is similar in these populations and if IS can benefit patients with IPAF to long term. In addition, it could be useful to include the UIP pattern within the IPAF classification criteria, not currently included, since it is the third most frequent radiological pattern.References:[1]Respirology, 21 (2016), pp. 245-258[2]Eur Respir J, 46 (2015), pp. 976-987Disclosure of Interests:Rafaela Ortega Castro: None declared, Pérez Sánchez Laura: None declared, Font Ugalde Pilar: None declared, Jerusalem Calvo Gutierrez: None declared, Antonio Requejo-Jimenez: None declared, Simona Espejo-Pérez: None declared, Teresa Gonzalez-Serrano: None declared, María del Carmen Castro Villegas: None declared, Gómez García Ignacio: None declared, Alejandro Escudero Contreras: None declared, Eduardo Collantes Estevez Grant/research support from: ROCHE and Pfizer, Speakers bureau: ROCHE, Lilly, Bristol and Celgene, Maria A Aguirre: None declared

scholarly journals SAT0098 TREATMENT OF A COHORT OF PATIENTS WITH INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE AND RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 982.2-982
Author(s):  
C. Aguilera Cros ◽  
M. Gomez Vargas ◽  
R. J. Gil Velez ◽  
J. A. Rodriguez Portal
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Usual Interstitial Pneumonia ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
American Thoracic Society ◽  
Rapid Progression

Background:There is no specific treatment for interstitial lung disease (ILD) secondary to Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) other than the treatment of RA without extra-articular involvement. Current regimens usually include corticosteroid therapy with or without immunosuppressants (IS), there is no consensus for the treatment.Objectives:To analyze the different treatment regimens in a cohort of patients with ILD and RA in our clinical practice.Methods:Descriptive study of 57 patients treated in our Hospital (1/1/2018 until 12/31/2019) with a diagnosis of RA (ACR 2010 criteria) and secondary ILD.The most recent American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS)/Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS)/Latin American Thoracic Society (ALAT) guidelines define three HRCT (High Resolution Computed Tomography) patterns of fibrosing lung disease in the setting of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF): definite Usual Interstitial pneumonia (UIP) (traction bronchiectasis and honeycombing), possible UIP and inconsistent with UIP. The distinction between definite UIP and possible UIP in these to the presence or absence of honeycombing. Approved by the Ethics Committee.Quantitative variables are expressed as mean (SD) and dichotomous variables as percentages (%). Statistical analysis with SPSS version 21.Results:21 men and 36 women were included, with a mean age of 69 ± 10 years (mean ± SD), history of smoking (smokers 14%, non-smokers 43%, former smokers 42%). Clinical ILD at diagnosis (dyspnea 61%, dry cough 56%, crackling 70%, acropachy 7%). 84% were positive rheumatoid factor and 70% positive anticitrullinated protein antibody.Diagnosis of ILD by HRCT in 100% of patients with different patterns: defined UIP 26 (45%), probable UIP 2 (3%) and not UIP 29 (50%). The diagnosis of ILD was confirmed by biopsy in 12 patients.79% underwent (T) treatment prior to the diagnosis of ILD with glucocorticoids and disease-modifying drugs (DMARD). Among the traditional DMARDs used were: Methotrexate 68% (there were no cases of MTX pneumonitis), Leflunomide 47%, Hydroxychloroquine 26% and Sulfasalazine 21%. Biological therapy in 15 patients: Etanercept 19%, Adalimumab 5%, Infliximab 3% and Certolizumab 2%. Two patients presented an exacerbation and rapid progression of the ILD during the T with Etanercept with the final result of death.T with IS after the diagnosis of ILD in 80% of patients (Azathioprine 15, Rituximab 14, Abatacept 10, Tocilizumab 4, Sarilumab 1, Mofetil mycophenolate 1 and Cyclophosphamide 1).Two patients with defined UIP perform T with antifibrotic: 1st Nintedanib (INBUILD Trial, This article was published on September 29, 2019, at NEJM.org) 2nd Pirfenidone (initial diagnosis of IPF Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and subsequent of seropositive RA with UIP). Both improved greater than 10% in forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) in the 6 months after onset of T.Conclusion:Our results, in general, agree with what is published in the literature. Prospective, multicentre and larger sample studies are necessary to better define which patients would benefit more from IS T or antifibrotic T (or if the antifibrotic should be added to the previous IS).Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document