scholarly journals Adaptive rescaling extends the dynamic ranges of central vestibular signals in the alert cat

2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (S2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Raquel Heskin-Sweezie ◽  
Yao-Fang Tan ◽  
Karl Farrow ◽  
Dianne M Broussard
Keyword(s):  
1987 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.V. Fanardjian ◽  
J.S. Sarkissian ◽  
I.A. Manvelian

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 1006-1010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark T. Wallace ◽  
M. Alex Meredith ◽  
Barry E. Stein

Wallace, Mark T., M. Alex Meredith, and Barry E. Stein. Multisensory integration in the superior colliculus of the alert cat. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 1006–1010, 1998. The modality convergence patterns, sensory response properties, and principles governing multisensory integration in the superior colliculus (SC) of the alert cat were found to have fundamental similarities to those in anesthetized animals. Of particular interest was the observation that, in a manner indistinguishable from the anesthetized animal, combinations of two different sensory stimuli significantly enhanced the responses of SC neurons above those evoked by either unimodal stimulus. These observations are consistent with the speculation that there is a functional link among multisensory integration in individual SC neurons and cross-modality attentive and orientation behaviors.


1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 3060-3076 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Paré ◽  
Daniel Guitton

Paré, Martin and Daniel Guitton. Brain stem omnipause neurons and the control of combined eye-head gaze saccades in the alert cat. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 3060–3076, 1998. When the head is unrestrained, rapid displacements of the visual axis—gaze shifts (eye-re-space)—are made by coordinated movements of the eyes (eye-re-head) and head (head-re-space). To address the problem of the neural control of gaze shifts, we studied and contrasted the discharges of omnipause neurons (OPNs) during a variety of combined eye-head gaze shifts and head-fixed eye saccades executed by alert cats. OPNs discharged tonically during intersaccadic intervals and at a reduced level during slow perisaccadic gaze movements sometimes accompanying saccades. Their activity ceased for the duration of the saccadic gaze shifts the animal executed, either by head-fixed eye saccades alone or by combined eye-head movements. This was true for all types of gaze shifts studied: active movements to visual targets; passive movements induced by whole-body rotation or by head rotation about stationary body; and electrically evoked movements by stimulation of the caudal part of the superior colliculus (SC), a central structure for gaze control. For combined eye-head gaze shifts, the OPN pause was therefore not correlated to the eye-in-head trajectory. For instance, in active gaze movements, the end of the pause was better correlated with the gaze end than with either the eye saccade end or the time of eye counterrotation. The hypothesis that cat OPNs participate in controlling gaze shifts is supported by these results, and also by the observation that the movements of both the eyes and the head were transiently interrupted by stimulation of OPNs during gaze shifts. However, we found that the OPN pause could be dissociated from the gaze-motor-error signal producing the gaze shift. First, OPNs resumed discharging when perturbation of head motion briefly interrupted a gaze shift before its intended amplitude was attained. Second, stimulation of caudal SC sites in head-free cat elicited large head-free gaze shifts consistent with the creation of a large gaze-motor-error signal. However, stimulation of the same sites in head-fixed cat produced small “goal-directed” eye saccades, and OPNs paused only for the duration of the latter; neither a pause nor an eye movement occurred when the same stimulation was applied with the eyes at the goal location. We conclude that OPNs can be controlled by neither a simple eye control system nor an absolute gaze control system. Our data cannot be accounted for by existing models describing the control of combined eye-head gaze shifts and therefore put new constraints on future models, which will have to incorporate all the various signals that act synergistically to control gaze shifts.


Neuroreport ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 365-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnès Gruart ◽  
José Maria Delgado-Garcia

1991 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 112
Author(s):  
Toshihiro Kitama ◽  
Hiroshi Shimazu ◽  
Maki Tanaka ◽  
Kaoru Yoshida

1995 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 273-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Kitama ◽  
Y. Ohki ◽  
H. Shimazu ◽  
M. Tanaka ◽  
K. Yoshida

1. Extracellular spikes of burster-driving neurons (BDNs) were recorded within and immediately below the prepositus hypoglossi nucleus in the alert cat. BDNs were characterized by short-latency activation after stimulation of the contralateral vestibular nerve (latency: 1.4-2.7 ms) and the ipsilateral superior colliculus (latency: 1.7-3.5 ms). Convergence of vestibular and collicular inputs was found in all of 85 BDNs tested. Firing of BDNs increased during contralateral horizontal head rotation and decreased during ipsilateral rotation. A burst of spikes was induced in association with contralateral saccades and quick phases of nystagmus. 2. BDNs showed irregular tonic discharges during fixation. There was no significant correlation between the firing rate during fixation and horizontal or vertical eye position in most BDNs. During horizontal sinusoidal head rotation, the change in firing rate was approximately proportional to and in phase with contralateral head velocity. The phase lag of the response relative to head angular velocity was 13.8 +/- 20.1 degrees (mean +/- SD) at 0.5 Hz and 7.2 +/- 13.5 degrees at 0.2 Hz on the average. The gain was 0.88 +/- 0.25 (spikes/s)/(degrees/s) at 0.5 Hz and 1.19 +/- 0.49 (spikes/s)/(degrees/s) at 0.2 Hz. 3. Quantitative analysis of burst activity associated with saccades or quick phases indicated that the ON direction of BDNs was contralateral horizontal. The number of spikes in the burst was linearly related to the amplitude of the contralateral component of rapid eye movements. The slope of regression line was, on the average, 1.14 +/- 0.48 spikes/deg. There was no significant difference between the mean slopes for saccades and quick phases. The number of spikes depended on the difference between initial and final horizontal eye positions and not on the absolute eye position in the orbit. The mean burst firing rate was proportional to the mean velocity of the contralateral component of rapid eye movements. The slope of the regression line was 0.82 +/- 0.34 (spikes/s)/(degrees/s). Significant correlation was also found between intraburst instantaneous firing rate and instantaneous component eye velocity. 4. Objects presented in the contralateral visual field elicited a brief burst of spikes in BDNs independent of any eye movement. Contralateral saccades to the target were preceded by an early response to the visual stimulus and subsequent response associated with eye movement. 5. Excitation of BDNs produced by stimulation of the ipsilateral superior colliculus was facilitated by contralateral horizontal head rotation. Therefore saccadic signals from the superior colliculus to BDNs may be augmented by vestibular signals during head rotation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document