scholarly journals Views of general practitioners on the role of CA125 in primary care to diagnose ovarian cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther L Moss ◽  
Alison Moran ◽  
Timothy M Reynolds ◽  
Helen Stokes-Lampard
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practitioners

scholarly journals Exploring general practitioners’ perceptions about the primary care gatekeeper role in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joko Mulyanto ◽  
Yudhi Wibowo ◽  
Dionne S. Kringos
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Work Experience ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Personal Factors ◽  
Healthcare Delivery System ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
And Performance

Abstract Background In the current healthcare delivery system funded by National Health Insurance (NHI) in Indonesia, the gatekeeper role of primary care services is critical to ensuring equal healthcare access for the population. To be effective, gatekeeping relies on the performance of general practitioners (GPs). However, the perceptions held by Indonesian GPs about their gatekeeper role are not yet well documented. This study describes the self-perceived knowledge, attitudes and performance of Indonesian GPs with respect to the gatekeeper role and explores associated factors. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study of all primary care facilities (N = 75) contracted by the regional NHI office in the Banyumas district. The 73 participating GPs completed a written questionnaire that assessed their knowledge, attitudes and performance in relation to the gatekeeper role. Personal and facility characteristics were analysed in a generalised linear model as possible associating factors.Results GPs scored relatively high in the domains of knowledge and performance but scored lower in their attitudes towards the gatekeeper role of primary care. In the full-adjusted model, no factors were significantly associated with the knowledge score. Work experience as GPs, private or civil service employment status and rural or urban location of the primary care facility were linked to attitude scores. Full- or part-time employment and type of facility were factors associated with the performance score. Conclusion GPs in Indonesia are knowledgeable and report that they adequately perform their function as gatekeepers in primary care. However, their attitudes towards the gatekeeper function are less positive. Attitudes and performance with respect to the primary care gatekeeper role are likely influenced more by contextual factors such as location and type of facility than by personal factors. Efforts to address contextual issues could include improvements in practice standards for privately practising physicians and public information campaigns about gatekeeping regulations. Such efforts will be crucial to improving the gatekeeper role of primary care in Indonesia and assuring efficient access to high-quality care for all.

scholarly journals The role of the psychiatrist in learning disability

1994 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 205-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah H. Bernard ◽  
Rosalind E. Bates
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Learning Disability ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Postal Questionnaire ◽  
Further Education ◽  
Care Level ◽  
Primary Care Level ◽  
Lack Of Knowledge

This study assessed, by postal questionnaire, how the role of the psychiatrist in learning disability is perceived by general practitioners. One hundred and forty-six GPs were questioned on various aspects of assessment and management that the psychiatrist in learning disability might be involved with; 43.5% of questionnaires were returned. The results indicated that confusion continues. The psychiatrist was perceived as having a global role in the care of this group of patients with lack of knowledge of community teams for learning disability being evident. Further education at a primary care level is indicated.

Indications for paediatric tonsillectomy GP versus Consultant perspective

1994 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Donnelly ◽  
M. S. Quraishi ◽  
D. P. McShane
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practitioner ◽  
Primary Care Physician ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Questionnaire Survey ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
The Past ◽  
Ear Infections ◽  
Glue Ear

AbstractTonsillectomy is a commonly performed operation in children. Although the justification for this procedure has been debatable in the past, more rigorous criteria in defining the need for tonsillectomies are becoming established. The role of the primary care physician in the management of tonsillar disease in children is important as the decision to refer a child for tonsillectomy is made by the general practitioner. A questionnaire survey of 400 general practitioners (GPs) and 31 consultant ENT surgeons was carried out to establish the important criteria used in deciding the need for paediatric tonsillectomy. We found that in general there was a good correlation between GP and Consultant indications for tonsillectomy. However there were two important areas of difference, while most of the GPs felt that recurrent ear infections and ‘glue ear’ were important indications for tonsillectomy, Consultants did not. Therefore we must be aware of the current recommendations for tonsillectomy and inform present and future GPs.

scholarly journals Exploring General Practitioners’ Perceptions About the Primary Care Gatekeeper Role in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joko Mulyanto ◽  
Yudhi Wibowo ◽  
Dionne S. Kringos
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Work Experience ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Personal Factors ◽  
Healthcare Delivery System ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
And Performance

Abstract Background In the current healthcare delivery system funded by National Health Insurance (NHI) in Indonesia, the gatekeeper role of primary care services is critical to ensuring equal healthcare access for the population. To be effective, gatekeeping relies on the performance of general practitioners (GPs). However, the perceptions held by Indonesian GPs about their gatekeeper role are not yet well documented. This study describes the self-perceived knowledge, attitudes and performance of Indonesian GPs with respect to the gatekeeper role and explores associated factors. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study of all primary care facilities (N = 75) contracted by the regional NHI office in the Banyumas district. The 73 participating GPs completed a written questionnaire that assessed their knowledge, attitudes and performance in relation to the gatekeeper role. Personal and facility characteristics were analysed in a generalised linear model as possible associating factors.ResultsGPs scored relatively high in the domains of knowledge and performance but scored lower in their attitudes towards the gatekeeper role of primary care. In the full-adjusted model, no factors were significantly associated with the knowledge score. Work experience as GPs, private or civil service employment status and rural or urban location of the primary care facility were linked to attitude scores. Full- or part-time employment and type of facility were factors associated with the performance score. Conclusion GPs in Indonesia are knowledgeable and report that they adequately perform their function as gatekeepers in primary care. However, their attitudes towards the gatekeeper function are less positive. Attitudes and performance with respect to the primary care gatekeeper role are likely influenced more by contextual factors such as location and type of facility than by personal factors. Efforts to address contextual issues could include improvements in practice standards for privately practising physicians and public information campaigns about gatekeeping regulations. Such efforts will be crucial to improving the gatekeeper role of primary care in Indonesia and assuring efficient access to high-quality care for all.

scholarly journals Exploring general practitioners’ perceptions about the primary care gatekeeper role in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joko Mulyanto ◽  
Yudhi Wibowo ◽  
Dionne S. Kringos
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Work Experience ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Personal Factors ◽  
Performance Score ◽  
Healthcare Delivery System ◽  
And Performance

Abstract Background In the current healthcare delivery system funded by National Health Insurance (NHI) in Indonesia, the gatekeeper role of primary care services is critical to ensuring equal healthcare access for the population. To be effective, gatekeeping relies on the performance of general practitioners (GPs). However, the perceptions held by Indonesian GPs about their gatekeeper role are not yet well documented. This study describes the self-perceived knowledge, attitudes and performance of Indonesian GPs with respect to the gatekeeper role and explores associated factors. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study of all primary care facilities (N = 75) contracted by the regional NHI office in the Banyumas district. The 73 participating GPs completed a written questionnaire that assessed their knowledge, attitudes and performance in relation to the gatekeeper role. Personal and facility characteristics were analysed in a generalised linear model as possible associating factors, as well as for the association between GPs’ knowledge and attitude with performance as gatekeepers. Results GPs scored relatively high in the domains of knowledge and performance but scored lower in their attitudes towards the gatekeeper role of primary care. In the full-adjusted model, no factors were significantly associated with the knowledge score. Work experience as GPs, private or civil service employment status and rural or urban location of the primary care facility were linked to attitude scores. Full- or part-time employment and type of facility were factors associated with the performance score. Attitude scores were positively associated with performance score.Conclusion GPs in Indonesia are knowledgeable and report that they adequately perform their function as gatekeepers in primary care. However, their attitudes towards the gatekeeper function are less positive. Attitudes and performance with respect to the primary care gatekeeper role are likely influenced more by contextual factors such as location and type of facility than by personal factors. Efforts to address contextual issues could include improvements in practice standards for privately practising physicians and public information campaigns about gatekeeping regulations. Such efforts will be crucial to improving the gatekeeper role of primary care in Indonesia and assuring efficient access to high-quality care for all.

scholarly journals Exploring general practitioners’ perceptions about the primary care gatekeeper role in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joko Mulyanto ◽  
Yudhi Wibowo ◽  
Dionne S. Kringos
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Work Experience ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Personal Factors ◽  
Performance Score ◽  
Healthcare Delivery System ◽  
And Performance

Abstract Background In the current healthcare delivery system funded by National Health Insurance (NHI) in Indonesia, the gatekeeper role of primary care services is critical to ensuring equal healthcare access for the population. To be effective, gatekeeping relies on the performance of general practitioners (GPs). However, the perceptions held by Indonesian GPs about their gatekeeper role are not yet well documented. This study describes the self-perceived knowledge, attitudes and performance of Indonesian GPs with respect to the gatekeeper role and explores associated factors. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study of all primary care facilities (N = 75) contracted by the regional NHI office in the Banyumas district. The 73 participating GPs completed a written questionnaire that assessed their knowledge, attitudes and performance in relation to the gatekeeper role. Personal and facility characteristics were analysed in a generalised linear model as possible associating factors, as well as for the association between GPs’ knowledge and attitude with performance as gatekeepers. Results GPs scored relatively high in the domains of knowledge and performance but scored lower in their attitudes towards the gatekeeper role of primary care. In the full-adjusted model, no factors were significantly associated with the knowledge score. Work experience as GPs, private or civil service employment status and rural or urban location of the primary care facility were linked to attitude scores. Full- or part-time employment and type of facility were factors associated with the performance score. Attitude scores were positively associated with performance score. Conclusion GPs in Indonesia are knowledgeable and report that they adequately perform their function as gatekeepers in primary care. However, their attitudes towards the gatekeeper function are less positive. Attitudes and performance with respect to the primary care gatekeeper role are likely influenced more by contextual factors such as location and type of facility than by personal factors. Efforts to address contextual issues could include improvements in practice standards for privately practising physicians and public information campaigns about gatekeeping regulations. Such efforts will be crucial to improving the gatekeeper role of primary care in Indonesia and assuring efficient access to high-quality care for all.

scholarly journals Exploring general practitioners’ perceptions about the primary care gatekeeper role in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joko Mulyanto ◽  
Yudhi Wibowo ◽  
Dionne S. Kringos
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Work Experience ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Personal Factors ◽  
Healthcare Delivery System ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
And Performance

Abstract Background In the current healthcare delivery system funded by National Health Insurance (NHI) in Indonesia, the gatekeeper role of primary care services is critical to ensuring equal healthcare access for the population. To be effective, gatekeeping relies on the performance of general practitioners (GPs). However, the perceptions held by Indonesian GPs about their gatekeeper role are not yet well documented. This study describes the self-perceived knowledge, attitudes and performance of Indonesian GPs with respect to the gatekeeper role and explores associated factors. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study of all primary care facilities (N = 75) contracted by the regional NHI office in the Banyumas district. The 73 participating GPs completed a written questionnaire that assessed their knowledge, attitudes and performance in relation to the gatekeeper role. Personal and facility characteristics were analysed in a generalised linear model as possible associating factors.Results GPs scored relatively high in the domains of knowledge and performance but scored lower in their attitudes towards the gatekeeper role of primary care. In the full-adjusted model, no factors were significantly associated with the knowledge score. Work experience as GPs, private or civil service employment status and rural or urban location of the primary care facility were linked to attitude scores. Full- or part-time employment and type of facility were factors associated with the performance score. Conclusion GPs in Indonesia are knowledgeable and report that they adequately perform their function as gatekeepers in primary care. However, their attitudes towards the gatekeeper function are less positive. Attitudes and performance with respect to the primary care gatekeeper role are likely influenced more by contextual factors such as location and type of facility than by personal factors. Efforts to address contextual issues could include improvements in practice standards for privately practising physicians and public information campaigns about gatekeeping regulations. Such efforts will be crucial to improving the gatekeeper role of primary care in Indonesia and assuring efficient access to high-quality care for all.

scholarly journals Analysis of General Practitioners’ Attitudes and Beliefs about Psychological Intervention and the Medicine–Psychology Relationship in Primary Care: Toward a New Comprehensive Approach to Primary Health Care

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 613
Author(s):  
Attà Negri ◽  
Claudia Zamin ◽  
Giulia Parisi ◽  
Anna Paladino ◽  
Giovanbattista Andreoli
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Psychological Intervention ◽  
World Health ◽  
Attitudes And Beliefs ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
Comprehensive Primary Health Care

The biopsychosocial paradigm is a model of care that has been proposed in order to improve the effectiveness of health care by promoting collaboration between different professions and disciplines. However, its application still faces several issues. A quantitative–qualitative survey was conducted on a sample of general practitioners (GPs) from Milan, Italy, to investigate their attitudes and beliefs regarding the role of the psychologist, the approach adopted to manage psychological diseases, and their experiences of collaboration with psychologists. The results show a partial view of the psychologist’s profession that limits the potential of integration between medicine and psychology in primary care. GPs recognized that many patients (66%) would often benefit from psychological intervention, but only in a few cases (9%) were these patients regularly referred to a psychologist. Furthermore, the referral represents an almost exclusive form of collaboration present in the opinions of GPs. Only 8% of GPs would consider the joint and integrated work of the psychologist and doctor useful within the primary health care setting. This vision of the role of psychologists among GPs represents a constraint in implementing a comprehensive primary health care approach, as advocated by the World Health Organization.

Ovarian cancer in primary care: The role of GPNs

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 444-447
Author(s):  
Jenny Aston ◽  
Elaine Biscoe ◽  
Sharon Tate
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Primary Care

Primary Care-Led Mental Health Service Reform: An Outline of the Better Outcomes in Mental Health Care Initiative

2002 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 376-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Hickie ◽  
Grace Groom
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Mental Health Care ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Course Of Illness ◽  
Major Development ◽  
Conceptual Community

Objective: To describe the key features of the ‘Better Outcomes in Mental Health Care’ initiative (2001-2005) and to detail some of the conceptual, community, professional and epidemiological forces that shaped its content. Conclusions: The ‘Better Outcomes in Mental Health Care’ initiative represents a major development in mental health care in Australia. It recognises the central role of primary care, promotes integrated medical and psychological care, rewards treatments that occur over an episode of illness, promotes active purchasing of non-pharmacological interventions earlier in the course of illness, and attempts to better link general practitioners, non-medical mental health specialists and psychiatrists to meet population-based mental health needs. Central to its development has been a commitment by general practitioners to develop progressively better mental health skills and measure both individual consumer and system-related outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document