scholarly journals Myocardial T1 mapping and extracellular volume quantification: a Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) and CMR Working Group of the European Society of Cardiology consensus statement

Author(s):  
James C Moon ◽  
Daniel R Messroghli ◽  
Peter Kellman ◽  
Stefan K Piechnik ◽  
Matthew D Robson ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Delgado ◽  
Antti Saraste ◽  
Marc Dweck ◽  
Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci ◽  
Jeroen J. Bax

AbstractAt the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) congress of this year 2019, held in Paris from August 31st to September 4th, 4509 abstracts were presented. Of those, 414 (9%) belonged to an imaging category. Experts in echocardiography (VD), nuclear imaging (AS), cardiac computed tomography (CT) (MD) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) (CBD), have selected the abstracts in their areas of expertise that were of most interest to them and are summarized in this bird’s eye view from this ESC meeting. These abstracts were integrated by one of the Editors of the Journal (JB).


2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 392-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Sado ◽  
Steven K. White ◽  
Stefan K. Piechnik ◽  
Sanjay M. Banypersad ◽  
Thomas Treibel ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Schofield ◽  
Katia Manacho ◽  
Silvia Castelletti ◽  
James C. Moon

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited cardiac disease. Cardiac imaging plays a key role in the diagnosis and management, with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) an important modality. CMR provides a number of different techniques in one examination: structure and function, flow imaging and tissue characterisation particularly with the late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) technique. Other techniques include vasodilator perfusion, mapping (especially T1 mapping and extracellular volume quantification [ECV]) and diffusion-weighted imaging with its potential to detect disarray. Clinically, the uses of CMR are diverse. The imaging must be considered within the context of work-up, particularly the personal and family history, Electrocardiogram (ECG) and echocardiogram findings. Subtle markers of possible HCM can be identified in genotype positive left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH)-negative subjects. CMR has particular advantages for assessment of the left ventricle (LV) apex and is able to detect both missed LVH (apical and basal antero-septum), when the echocardiography is normal but the ECG abnormal. CMR is important in distinguishing HCM from both common phenocopies (hypertensive heart disease, athletic adaptation, ageing related changes) and rarer pheno and/or genocopies such as Fabry disease and amyloidosis. For these, in particular the LGE technique and T1 mapping are very useful with a low T1 in Fabry’s, and high T1 and very high ECV in amyloidosis. Moreover, the tissue characterisation that is possible using CMR offers a potential role in patient risk stratification, as scar is a very strong predictor of future heart failure. Scar may also play a role in the prediction of sudden death. CMR is helpful in follow-up assessment, especially after septal alcohol ablation and myomectomy.


Author(s):  
Ulf K Radunski ◽  
Gunnar Lund ◽  
Mandana D Nariman ◽  
Bernhard Schnackenburg ◽  
Christian Stehning ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document