scholarly journals Afatinib versus placebo as adjuvant therapy after chemoradiation in a double-blind, phase III study (LUX-Head & Neck 2) in patients with primary unresected, clinically intermediate-to-high-risk head and neck cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Burtness ◽  
Jean P Bourhis ◽  
Jan B Vermorken ◽  
Kevin J Harrington ◽  
Ezra EW Cohen
2021 ◽  
pp. JCO.20.03282
Author(s):  
Vedang Murthy ◽  
Priyamvada Maitre ◽  
Sadhana Kannan ◽  
Gitanjali Panigrahi ◽  
Rahul Krishnatry ◽  
...  

PURPOSE We report the clinical outcomes of a randomized trial comparing prophylactic whole-pelvic nodal radiotherapy to prostate-only radiotherapy (PORT) in high-risk prostate cancer. METHODS This phase III, single center, randomized controlled trial enrolled eligible patients undergoing radical radiotherapy for node-negative prostate adenocarcinoma, with estimated nodal risk ≥ 20%. Randomization was 1:1 to PORT (68 Gy/25# to prostate) or whole-pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT, 68 Gy/25# to prostate, 50 Gy/25# to pelvic nodes, including common iliac) using computerized stratified block randomization, stratified by Gleason score, type of androgen deprivation, prostate-specific antigen at diagnosis, and prior transurethral resection of the prostate. All patients received image-guided, intensity-modulated radiotherapy and minimum 2 years of androgen deprivation therapy. The primary end point was 5-year biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS), and secondary end points were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS From November 2011 to August 2017, a total of 224 patients were randomly assigned (PORT = 114, WPRT = 110). At a median follow-up of 68 months, 36 biochemical failures (PORT = 25, WPRT = 7) and 24 deaths (PORT = 13, WPRT = 11) were recorded. Five-year BFFS was 95.0% (95% CI, 88.4 to 97.9) with WPRT versus 81.2% (95% CI, 71.6 to 87.8) with PORT, with an unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.23 (95% CI, 0.10 to 0.52; P < .0001). WPRT also showed higher 5-year DFS (89.5% v 77.2%; HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.73; P = .002), but 5-year OS did not appear to differ (92.5% v 90.8%; HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.41 to 2.05; P = .83). Distant metastasis-free survival was also higher with WPRT (95.9% v 89.2%; HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.82; P = .01). Benefit in BFFS and DFS was maintained across prognostic subgroups. CONCLUSION Prophylactic pelvic irradiation for high-risk, locally advanced prostate cancer improved BFFS and DFS as compared with PORT, but OS did not appear to differ.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA6006-LBA6006
Author(s):  
C. Nutting ◽  
R. A'Hern ◽  
M. S. Rogers ◽  
M. A. Sydenham ◽  
F. Adab ◽  
...  

LBA6006 The full, final text of this abstract will be available in Part II of the 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings, distributed onsite at the Meeting on May 30, 2009, and as a supplement to the June 20, 2009, issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology. [Table: see text]


PEDIATRICS ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 131 (4) ◽  
pp. 661-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Chowdhury ◽  
S. A. McKenzie ◽  
C. C. Pearson ◽  
S. Carr ◽  
C. Pao ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 156 (6) ◽  
pp. 1336-1341 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Lodi ◽  
M. Tarozzi ◽  
A. Sardella ◽  
F. Demarosi ◽  
L. Canegallo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document