scholarly journals Understanding olfactory information processing by combining a physiologically realistic model of the olfactory bulb and olfactory cortex

Flavour ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon O’Connor
Author(s):  
John G. Hildebrand ◽  
Joshua P. Martin ◽  
Carolina E. Reisenman ◽  
Hong Lei ◽  
Jeffrey A. Riffell

Author(s):  
Thomas P. Eiting ◽  
Matt Wachowiak

AbstractSniffing—the active control of breathing beyond passive respiration—is used by mammals to modulate olfactory sampling. Sniffing allows animals to make odor-guided decisions within ~200 ms, but animals routinely engage in bouts of high-frequency sniffing spanning several seconds; the impact of such repeated odorant sampling on odor representations remains unclear. We investigated this question in the mouse olfactory bulb, where mitral and tufted cells (MTCs) form parallel output streams of odor information processing. To test the impact of repeated odorant sampling on MTC responses, we used two-photon imaging in anesthetized male and female mice to record activation of MTCs while precisely varying inhalation frequency. A combination of genetic targeting and viral expression of GCaMP6 reporters allowed us to access mitral (MC) and superficial tufted cell (sTC) subpopulations separately. We found that repeated odorant sampling differentially affected responses in MCs and sTCs, with MCs showing more diversity than sTCs over the same time period. Impacts of repeated sampling among MCs included both increases and decreases in excitation, as well as changes in response polarity. Response patterns across ensembles of simultaneously-imaged MCs reformatted over time, with representations of different odorants becoming more distinct. MCs also responded differentially to changes in inhalation frequency, whereas sTC responses were more uniform over time and across frequency. Our results support the idea that MCs and TCs comprise functionally distinct pathways for odor information processing, and suggest that the reformatting of MC odor representations by high-frequency sniffing may serve to enhance the discrimination of similar odors.


Neuroenology ◽  
2016 ◽  
pp. 128-134
Author(s):  
Gordon M. Shepherd

We compare the initial experience of the aroma of the wine in the glass with the experience of the retronasal aroma as it contributes to the full flavor of the wine in the mouth and throat. We discuss the controversy over whether retronasal smell is less sensitive than orthonasal smell, and what could be the reasons. The processing of retronasal smell images is described from the olfactory receptors to the olfactory bulb, olfactory cortex, and highest cortical levels.


2014 ◽  
pp. 133-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shin Nagayama ◽  
Kei M. Igarashi ◽  
Hiroyuki Manabe ◽  
Kensaku Mori

2021 ◽  
pp. 851-861
Author(s):  
Kelly D. Flemming

This chapter briefly repeats key anatomic characteristics and then reviews clinical disorders affecting each cranial nerve in addition to the brainstem. More specifically, this chapter covers cranial nerves I, V, VII, and IX through XII plus the brainstem. The olfactory nerve is a special visceral afferent nerve that functions in the sense of smell. The axons of the olfactory receptor cells within the nasal cavity extend through the cribriform plate to the olfactory bulb. These olfactory receptor cell axons synapse with mitral cells in the olfactory bulb. Mitral cell axons project to the primary olfactory cortex and amygdala. The olfactory cortex interconnects with various autonomic and visceral centers.


2010 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 458-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Pierre Dupuis ◽  
Michaël Bazelot ◽  
Guillaume Stéphane Barbara ◽  
Sandrine Paute ◽  
Monique Gauthier ◽  
...  

γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA)–gated chloride channel receptors are abundant in the CNS, where their physiological role is to mediate fast inhibitory neurotransmission. In insects, this inhibitory transmission plays a crucial role in olfactory information processing. In an effort to understand the nature and properties of the ionotropic receptors involved in these processes in the honeybee Apis mellifera, we performed a pharmacological and molecular characterization of GABA-gated channels in the primary olfactory neuropile of the honeybee brain—the antennal lobe (AL)—using whole cell patch-clamp recordings coupled with single-cell RT-PCR. Application of GABA onto AL cells at −110 mV elicited fast inward currents, demonstrating the existence of ionotropic GABA-gated chloride channels. Molecular analysis of the GABA-responding cells revealed that both subunits RDL and LCCH3 were expressed out of the three orthologs of Drosophila melanogaster GABA-receptor subunits encoded within the honeybee genome (RDL, resistant to dieldrin; GRD, GABA/glycine-like receptor of Drosophila ; LCCH3, ligand-gated chloride channel homologue 3), opening the door to possible homo- and/or heteromeric associations. The resulting receptors were activated by insect GABA-receptor agonists muscimol and CACA and blocked by antagonists fipronil, dieldrin, and picrotoxin, but not bicuculline, displaying a typical RDL-like pharmacology. Interestingly, increasing the intracellular calcium concentration potentiated GABA-elicited currents, suggesting a modulating effect of calcium on GABA receptors possibly through phosphorylation processes that remain to be determined. These results indicate that adult honeybee AL cells express typical RDL-like GABA receptors whose properties support a major role in synaptic inhibitory transmission during olfactory information processing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document