scholarly journals Degradation of biodegradable plastic mulch films in soil environment by phylloplane fungi isolated from gramineous plants

AMB Express ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motoo Koitabashi ◽  
Masako T Noguchi ◽  
Yuka Sameshima-Yamashita ◽  
Syuntaro Hiradate ◽  
Ken Suzuki ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Marife B. Anunciado ◽  
Douglas G. Hayes ◽  
Anton F. Astner ◽  
Larry C. Wadsworth ◽  
Christina Danielle Cowan-Banker ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Matteo Francioni ◽  
Ayaka Wenhong Kishimoto-Mo ◽  
Shun Tsuboi ◽  
Yuko Takada Hoshino

Plastic mulch films are widely used in agriculture, but most are not biodegradable in soil. Biodegradable mulch films are blends of different polymers whose composition-ratios vary notably from one product to another. Their degradation rates vary greatly according to the physio-chemical characteristics of the product and according to the properties of the soil and its microbial activity. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of the methods used to estimate the biodegradation performances of biodegradable plastics in the soil. In line with this objective, 80 papers were selected and systematically analyzed to extract information on the characteristics of the soil used in the experiments, the type of polymer analyzed, and the methods used to estimate biodegradation in soil environment. Our systematic analysis showed that studies were carried out under both laboratory-controlled and open-field conditions, with different approaches involving visual analysis, mass loss measurements, spectroscopy, and CO2 measurements. A linear estimation of biodegradation performance for four of the most common biodegradable polymers (i.e., polybutylene succinate, polybutylene succinate-co-adipate, polylactic acid, and polybutylene adipate-co-terephthalate), either pure or blended, showed a very wide range of results that appear only partially comparable. Many of the analyzed papers did not report soil characteristics at all, despite soil being one of the most important factors in the biodegradation process. Although methodologies for estimating biodegradation are well developed, at least under laboratory-controlled conditions, there is a need for a shared methodology to make results comparable among different experiments. Within such a shared methodology, visual analysis or mass loss measurements, despite not being able to scientifically prove the biodegradation of polymers, should not be discarded a priori as they might be useful indicators especially for open field experiments. When using indirect biodegradation indicators such as visual analysis or mass loss, it is necessary to couple them with CO2 measurements or to use materials whose biodegradability in the soil environment has already been tested.


Author(s):  
Graham Bailes ◽  
Margaret Lind ◽  
Andrew Ely ◽  
Marianne Powell ◽  
Jennifer Moore-Kucera ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sreejata Bandopadhyay ◽  
José E. Liquet y González ◽  
Kelsey B. Henderson ◽  
Marife B. Anunciado ◽  
Douglas G. Hayes ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 727 ◽  
pp. 138668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Y. Sintim ◽  
Andy I. Bary ◽  
Douglas G. Hayes ◽  
Larry C. Wadsworth ◽  
Marife B. Anunciado ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 861-889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenhui Li ◽  
Jennifer Moore-Kucera ◽  
Carol Miles ◽  
Karen Leonas ◽  
Jaehoon Lee ◽  
...  

PeerJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. e9015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sreejata Bandopadhyay ◽  
Henry Y. Sintim ◽  
Jennifer M. DeBruyn

Plastic mulch films are used globally in crop production but incur considerable disposal and environmental pollution issues. Biodegradable plastic mulch films (BDMs), an alternative to polyethylene (PE)-based films, are designed to be tilled into the soil where they are expected to be mineralized to carbon dioxide, water and microbial biomass. However, insufficient research regarding the impacts of repeated soil incorporation of BDMs on soil microbial communities has partly contributed to limited adoption of BDMs. In this study, we evaluated the effects of BDM incorporation on soil microbial community structure and function over two years in two geographical locations: Knoxville, TN, and in Mount Vernon, WA, USA. Treatments included four plastic BDMs (three commercially available and one experimental film), a biodegradable cellulose paper mulch, a non-biodegradable PE mulch and a no mulch plot. Bacterial community structure determined using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing revealed significant differences by location and season. Differences in bacterial communities by mulch treatment were not significant for any season in either location, except for Fall 2015 in WA where differences were observed between BDMs and no-mulch plots. Extracellular enzyme assays were used to characterize communities functionally, revealing significant differences by location and sampling season in both TN and WA but minimal differences between BDMs and PE treatments. Overall, BDMs had comparable influences on soil microbial communities to PE mulch films.


Author(s):  
Douglas G. Hayes ◽  
Marife B. Anunciado ◽  
Jennifer M. DeBruyn ◽  
Sreejata Bandopadhyay ◽  
Sean Schaeffer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document