scholarly journals Margin width influencing local recurrence in ductal carcinoma in situ

1999 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Balvinder Shoker
2006 ◽  
Vol 192 (4) ◽  
pp. 420-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather R. Macdonald ◽  
Melvin J. Silverstein ◽  
Laura A. Lee ◽  
Wei Ye ◽  
Premal Sanghavi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Doski

Abstract Introduction In the UK, breast conserving surgery (BCS) has been indicated to completely excise ductal carcinoma in situ(DCIS) to negative margins for around 70% of diagnosed women. The tumour-free radial surgical margin width is an important marker for determining the local recurrence (LR). Setting the margin too wide will result in additional re-excision and too low may result in increased LR rates. This review investigates the different tumour-free margins and its effect on LR. Method A literature review was conducted using the Cochrane library and Pubmed database with key terms. Cohort studies of more than 100 participants with a five-year follow up in women over 18 were included. Results >2mm versus 0mm: LR was significantly reduced in DCIS from one very-low evidence retrospective cohort studies (N = 1,503). >2mm versus 1-2mm: Meaningful reduction in LR with DCIS was found in one very low-quality retrospective cohort study(N = 433). >2mm versus <1mm: Clinically meaningful reduction in LR for DCIS was found in very low-quality retrospective study (N = 466). >2mm versus 1-2mm: Meaningful reduction in LR with DCIS was found in one very low-quality retrospective cohort study(N = 433). Conclusions LR rates were reduced by further increasing the negative margin width in DCIS but only low-quality evidence was available to define these margins. This is an area for further research to enhance patient care and prevent increased LR.


2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 2029-2035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory E. Ekatah ◽  
Arran K. Turnbull ◽  
Laura M. Arthur ◽  
Jeremy Thomas ◽  
Christine Dodds ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 107327482199742
Author(s):  
Kai-yun You ◽  
Zhuo-fei Bi ◽  
Yu-jia Ma ◽  
Yong-lin Mao ◽  
Wei-liang Zou ◽  
...  

Purpose: Although breast conservation surgery(BCS) followed by adjuvant radiotherapy is now the mainstream treatment method for breast ductal carcinoma in situ(DCIS), mastectomy is still performed in some patients who refuse to undergo radiation. However, the most effective treatment method for these patients is still unknown. In the current study, we aimed to compare the survival rates between mastectomy and BCS plus adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with DCIS. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 333 patients with DCIS from May 2004 to December 2016. There were 209 patents who were treated with BCS and adjuvant radiotherapy, while the remaining of 124 patients underwent mastectomy. The disease-free survival (DFS) and local recurrence-free survival(LRFS) rates were compared between the 2 treatment groups. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to explore factors associated with DFS and LRFS. Results: The 10-year local recurrence(LR) rates in the mastectomy and BCS plus adjuvant radiotherapy groups were 2.6% and 7.5%, respectively. There was no difference in the LR rate between the 2 groups. Furthermore the DFS rate was also similar between the mastectomy and BCS plus adjuvant radiotherapy groups. Based on the multivariable analysis, age and tumor grade were significantly correlated with the LRFS and DFS rates. In the subgroup analysis based on the factors of age and tumor grade, patients with a tumor grade of III who underwent mastectomy had better LRFS and DFS rates compared to those who received BCS plus radiotherapy. Conclusion: In patients with DCIS, the long-term efficacy was similar between mastectomy and BCS followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. However, in the subgroup of patients with grade III tumors, mastectomy seems to offer a better LRFS and DFS than BCS plus radiotherapy.


Author(s):  
S Hetelekidis ◽  
L Collins ◽  
SJ Schnitt ◽  
A Recht ◽  
AJ Nixon ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 430-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard C. Montgomery ◽  
Barbara L. Fowble ◽  
Lori J. Goldstein ◽  
David P. May ◽  
John P. Hoffman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document