scholarly journals A comparison of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit and the NEECHAM confusion scale in intensive care delirium assessment

Critical Care ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. P419
Author(s):  
B Van Rompaey ◽  
L Bossaert ◽  
L Shortridge-Bagett ◽  
M Schuurmans ◽  
S Truijen
2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (21-22) ◽  
pp. 4028-4039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vimala Ramoo ◽  
Harlinna Abu ◽  
Vineya Rai ◽  
Surindar Kaur Surat Singh ◽  
Ayuni Asma’ Baharudin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 42-52
Author(s):  
Denise M. Kresevic ◽  
Donna Miller ◽  
Carole W. Fuseck ◽  
Mia Wade ◽  
Laura Whitney ◽  
...  

Background Delirium is a complex syndrome prevalent in the intensive care unit. It has been associated with significant morbidity including distress, longer hospital stays, prolonged cognitive impairment, and increased mortality. Objective To describe a nurse-led interdisciplinary quality improvement initiative to increase nurses’ knowledge of delirium, documentation of delirium assessment, and patient mobility. Methods Sixty-seven nurses in medical and surgical intensive care units were required to attend an interactive education program on delirium assessment and management. Scores on tests taken before and after the education program were used to evaluate knowledge. Medical records and bedside rounds were used to validate Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit documentation and interventions. Descriptive statistics were used to describe changes over time. A delirium resource team composed of nurses, physicians, and therapists provided didactic education paired with simulation training and bedside coaching. Mobility screening tests and computer templates guided assessments and interventions. Results Documentation of the Confusion Assessment Method improved from less than 50% to consistently 99%. Mobilization in the surgical intensive care unit increased from 90% to 98% after intervention. Days of delirium significantly decreased from 51% before intervention to 31% after intervention (χ12=7.01, P = .008). Conclusions The success of this quality improvement project to enhance recognition of delirium and increase mobility (critical components of the pain assessment, breathing, sedation choice, delirium, early mobility, and family education bundle) was contingent on nursing leaders hip, interdisciplinary team collaboration, and interactive education.


Author(s):  
Andrea Kirfel ◽  
Jan Menzenbach ◽  
Vera Guttenthaler ◽  
Johanna Feggeler ◽  
Andreas Mayr ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Postoperative delirium (POD) is a relevant and underdiagnosed complication after cardiac surgery that is associated with increased intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS). The aim of this subgroup study was to compare the frequency of tested POD versus the coded International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) diagnosis of POD and to evaluate the influence of POD on LOS in ICU and hospital. Methods 254 elective cardiac surgery patients (mean age, 70.5 ± 6.4 years) at the University Hospital Bonn between September 2018 and October 2019 were evaluated. The endpoint tested POD was considered positive, if one of the tests Confusion Assessment Method for ICU (CAM-ICU) or Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), 4 'A's Test (4AT) or Delirium Observation Scale (DOS) was positive on one day. Results POD occurred in 127 patients (50.0%). LOS in ICU and hospital were significantly different based on presence (ICU 165.0 ± 362.7 h; Hospital 26.5 ± 26.1 days) or absence (ICU 64.5 ± 79.4 h; Hospital 14.6 ± 6.7 days) of POD (p < 0.001). The multiple linear regression showed POD as an independent predictor for a prolonged LOS in ICU (48%; 95%CI 31–67%) and in hospital (64%; 95%CI 27–110%) (p < 0.001). The frequency of POD in the study participants that was coded with the ICD F05.0 and F05.8 by hospital staff was considerably lower than tests revealed by the study personnel. Conclusion Approximately 50% of elderly patients who underwent cardiac surgery developed POD, which is associated with an increased ICU and hospital LOS. Furthermore, POD is highly underdiagnosed in clinical routine.


2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Wesley Ely ◽  
Sharon K. Inouye ◽  
Gordon R. Bernard ◽  
Joseph Francis ◽  
Lisa May ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Layth Al Tmimi ◽  
Marc Van de Velde ◽  
Bart Meyns ◽  
Bart Meuris ◽  
Paul Sergeant ◽  
...  

AbstractBackground:To investigate the predictive value of S100 (biochemical marker of neuroglial injury) for the occurrence of postoperative delirium (POD) in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB)-surgery.Methods:We enrolled 92 patients older than 18 years undergoing elective OPCAB-surgery. Serum-levels of S100 were determined at baseline (BL), end of surgery (EOS) and on the first postoperative day (PD1). Postoperatively, all-patients were evaluated daily until PD5 for the presence of POD using the confusion assessment method (CAM) or the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).Results:The overall incidence of POD was 21%. S100-values on PD1 significantly predicted the occurrence of POD during the later hospital stay [area under the curve (AUC)=0.724 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.619–0.814); p=0.0001] with an optimal cut-off level of 123 pg mLConclusions:S100-levels <123 pg mL


2014 ◽  
pp. 879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanyong Pipanmekaporn ◽  
Nahathai Wongpakaran ◽  
Sirirat Mueankwan ◽  
Piyawat Dendumrongkul ◽  
Kaweesak Chittawatanarat ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document