scholarly journals Factors influencing patient willingness to participate in genetic research after a myocardial infarction

10.1186/gm255 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E Lanfear ◽  
Philip G Jones ◽  
Sharon Cresci ◽  
Fengming Tang ◽  
Saif S Rathore ◽  
...  
Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
David E Lanfear ◽  
Philip G Jones ◽  
Sharon Cresci ◽  
Fengming Tang ◽  
Saif S Rathore ◽  
...  

To achieve ‘Personalized Medicine’, identifying genetic associations with outcomes is essential. However, not all patients invited to participate in such studies agree. While existing data suggests race, gender, and education may influence this decision, correlates of patient willingness to participate in genetic studies remain incompletely understood. We assessed correlates of patient participation in the genetic substudy of TRIUMPH, a prospective myocardial infarction registry ongoing at 26 US hospitals. Patients enrolled in the first wave (4/05–12/06, N=1854) were analyzed. Factors examined included sociodemographics, financial status, social support, medical literacy, health status, depressive symptoms (PHQ-9, higher scores indicate greater depression) and 26 clinical variables. Predictors of participation were identified using hierarchical logistic regression adjusting for hospital. Variation in consent rates across hospitals was quantified by the median odds ratio (MOR), which compares the odds of consent between two randomly selected patients with identical covariates chosen from different hospitals. Most subjects consented to donation and storage of their genetic material (1,513, 81.6%). Participation rates varied greatly by site, ranging from 50% to 100%. After adjustment for possible confounding by patient factors, the MOR for hospitals was 4.5. Clinical characteristics were not associated with participation in univariate analysis (all p>0.1). In multivariable analysis adjusted for hospital, the only significant predictors of consent were greater depressive symptoms (OR 1.41 per +5 PHQ points, 95% CI 1.19–1.67, p<0.0001), and gender (OR 1.54 for males, 95% CI 1.16–2.04, p=0.0027). Roughly 80% of subjects enrolled in our study consented to genetic analysis. The strongest overall factor associated with participation was hospital. While we cannot rule out confounding by unmeasured characteristics, this suggests that variation in the way information is presented, or other site-specific factors, strongly influence patient participation in genetic studies. This research has received full or partial funding support from the American Heart Association, AHA Midwest Affiliate (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota & Wisconsin).


1982 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 299-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
William L. Haskell ◽  
William Savin ◽  
Neil Oldridge ◽  
Robert DeBusk

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taylor R. Thomas ◽  
Dabney Hofammann ◽  
Brooke G. McKenna ◽  
Anna I.R. van der Miesen ◽  
Mark A. Stokes ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTBiological sex is an important factor in mental health, and a non-binary view of how variation in sex and gender influence mental health represents a new research frontier that may yield new insights. The recent acceleration of research into sexual orientation, gender identity, and mental health has generally been conducted without sufficient understanding of the opinions of sexual and gender minorities (SGM) toward this research. We surveyed 768 individuals, with an enrichment of LGBTQ+ stakeholders, for their opinions regarding genetic research of SGM and mental health. We found that the key predictors of attitudes toward genetic research specifically on SGM are 1) general attitudes toward genetic and mental health research 2) tolerance of SGM and associated behaviors 3) non-cisgender stakeholder status and 4) age of the respondent. Non-heterosexual stakeholder status was significantly associated with increased willingness to participate in genetic research if a biological basis for gender identity were discovered. We also found that non-stakeholders with a low tolerance for SGM indicated their SGM views would be positively updated if science showed a biological basis for their behaviors and identities. These findings represent an important first step in understanding and engaging the LGBTQ+ stakeholder community in the context of genetic research.


2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-1225
Author(s):  
Kate T. Avery ◽  
Amy Ratner ◽  
Claire Baker ◽  
Melissa Secord ◽  
Marie Robert ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
James Akazili ◽  
Samuel Chatio ◽  
Fabian Sebastian Achana ◽  
Abraham Oduro ◽  
Edmund W. Kanmiki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document