scholarly journals Research capacity of Australian and New Zealand emergency medicine departments

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie Walker ◽  
◽  
Shijie Ian Tan ◽  
Daniel Fatovich ◽  
Gina Watkins ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie Walker ◽  
Shijie Ian Tan ◽  
Daniel Fatovich ◽  
Gina Watkins ◽  
Melanie Stephenson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Large, multicentre studies are required in emergency medicine to advance clinical care and improve patient outcomes. The Australasian College for Emergency Medicine clinical trials network is available to researchers to assist with facilitating large, multicentre research. However, there is no current information about the research capacity of emergency departments (EDs) in Australia and New Zealand. Methods All EDs accredited for emergency medicine training in Australia and New Zealand were eligible to participate. Research leads or ED directors were invited via email and telephone to complete a survey. Data were collected regarding the presence of a research lead, their research experience; available research resources including colleagues, funding, departmental paid research time; publications and research culture. Results One hundred and twelve responses were received on behalf of 122 (84%) sites (10 satellite plus main) from a possible 143 sites with all types of hospitals and regions represented. Research leads were identified at 66 (59%) sites, 32 (29%) had a director of emergency medicine research. A wide range of research was underway. Ninety-six sites (66%) contributed data to multicentre projects. Twenty-one centres (17%), were highly productive with multiple resources (skilled colleagues, funding, staffing), a positive research culture and high volume output. Sixty to seventy centres (50-58%) had limited resources, experienced an unsupportive research culture and authored manuscripts infrequently. Paid time for research directors was associated with increased research outputs. Discussion ACEM sites have capacity to undertake large multicentre studies with a varied network of sites and researchers. While some sites are well equipped for research, the majority of EDs had minimal research output.


2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-68
Author(s):  
Alasdair B MacDonald ◽  

The environments in which General, Acute and Emergency Medicine have evolved in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom have differed significantly. As a result of this, the development and the role of Acute Medicine have also had significant contrasts but there are also many similarities and opportunities for shared learning. We are now in a position to look maturely at our services and allow a little constructive ‘compare and contrast’. Confidence in our own models means now we can each embrace diversity rather than believe one size fits all – not just across the world but also in our own backyards.


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Sullivan ◽  
Sarah Derrett ◽  
Charlotte Paul ◽  
Carolyn Beaver ◽  
Hilary Stace

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Leitch

ABSTRACT Practice Based Research Networks (PBRNs) are groups of general practices collaborating to produce research. Contemporary New Zealand health information technology systems are ideal for electronic data extraction for PBRN research. Stakeholders have a valuable, but typically underutilised, part to play in research. Development of an e-participation platform will facilitate stakeholder engagement. New Zealand is in a unique position to create an innovative, low cost, stakeholder-engaged PBRN. This type of PBRN would offer unparalleled research opportunities, and would strengthen New Zealand’s general practice research capacity. The more research information we have based on our New Zealand population, the more appropriate care we can provide. Establishing a stakeholder-engaged PBRN in New Zealand will promote and support transformational change within our health system. In June 2015 I had the privilege of attending the annual Practice Based Research Network (PBRN) Conference held in Bethesda, near Washington D.C. The conference is hosted by the North American Primary Care Research Group and the United States (US) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. In this article I draw on the knowledge I gained at that conference and discuss its translation to New Zealand.


2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faith Ng ◽  
Alice Ayres ◽  
Shuichi Suetani ◽  
Stephen Parker

Objectives: The Scholarly Project is a relevant task to support building a culture of research in psychiatry across Australia and New Zealand. However, there are several impediments to trainees’ confident completion of this project. The authors review recent literature on the challenges voiced by trainees, as well as solutions posed by clinician-researchers and medical educators. Relevant strategies are highlighted, and several practical solutions to support the completion of the Scholarly Project are proposed. Conclusions: There are several pathways available to alleviate barriers to trainees’ timely commencement and completion of the Scholarly Project, including enhancing research capacity within services, familiarity with the requirements, access to supervisors and additional support for trainees.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document