scholarly journals Laser lithotripsy using dusting technique (low energy, high frequency) for symptomatic upper urinary tract stones

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Ashmawy ◽  
M. Khedr ◽  
I. R. Saad ◽  
S. Zamel ◽  
A. Kassem
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Hounsfield Unit ◽  
Spiral Ct ◽  
Upper Urinary Tract ◽  
Laser Lithotripsy ◽  
Low Energy ◽  
Stone Size ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Free Rate

Abstract Background A prospective study to assess the feasibility of stone dusting technique (low energy and high frequency) during laser lithotripsy in symptomatic upper urinary tract |(UUT) stones. Methods Sixty patients with symptomatic single or multiple UUT stones less than 3 cm in diameter were included. Patients with coagulation disorders and active UTIs were excluded. All patients were clinically evaluated and underwent non-contrast spiral CT (NCSCT) to detect stone site, size, number, Hounsfield unit. A rigid or flexible ureteroscope was used with stone dusting using the Ho: YAG laser at low-energy and high-frequency (0.5 J & 20 Hz) set. Operative and fluoroscopy time, total energy delivered, type of stent, hospitalization time, complications and its grade, and stone-free rate using NCSCT after 4 weeks were recorded. Results The mean stone size ± SD (range) was 1.55 ± 0.55 (0.5–3) cm; out of sixty patients (50 with single stone and 10 with multiple stones), fifty-five patients were stone-free at 4 weeks. Complications had occurred in 11 patients (eight with grade I, one with grade II, and two with grade IIIa) according to Clavien–Dindo grading of surgical complications. Stone size was the only parameter which correlated significantly with stone-free rate. No significant correlation was found between incidence of complications and other parameters (stone size, site, BMI, age and operative time). Conclusions Stone dusting technique is feasible, safe and effective in management of UUT stones.

scholarly journals Treatment of upper urinary tract stones with flexible ureteroscopy in children

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Xiao ◽  
Xiangyu Wang ◽  
Jun Li ◽  
Miaomiao Wang ◽  
Tiandong Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Upper Urinary Tract ◽  
Laser Lithotripsy ◽  
Holmium Laser ◽  
Flexible Ureteroscopy ◽  
Holmium Laser Lithotripsy ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Urinary Tract Stones ◽  
Free Rate

Introduction: This single-centre, retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) combined with holmium laser lithotripsy in treating children with upper urinary tract stones. Methods: From June 2014 to October 2015, a total of 100 children (74 boys and 26 girls) with upper urinary tract stones were treated using FURS. A 4.7 Fr double-J stent was placed two weeks before operation. Patients were considered stone-free when the absence of residual fragments was observed on imaging studies. The preoperative, operative, and postoperative data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed. Results: A total of 100 pediatric patients with a mean age of 3.51±1.82 years underwent 131 FURS and holmium laser lithotripsy. Mean stone diameter was 1.49±0.92 cm. Average operation time was 30.8 minutes (range 15–60). The laser power was controlled between 18 and 32 W, and the energy maintained between 0.6 and 0.8 J at any time; laser frequency was controlled between 30 and 40 Hz. Complications were observed in 69 (69.0 %) patients and classified according to the Clavien system. Postoperative hematuria (Clavien I) occurred in 64 (64.0 %) patients. Postoperative urinary tract infection with fever (Clavien II) was observed in 8/113 (7.1%) patients. No ureteral perforation and mucosa avulsion occurred. The overall stone-free rate of single operation was 89/100 (89%). Stone diameter and staghorn calculi were significantly associated with stone-free rate. Conclusions: FURS and holmium laser lithotripsy is effective and safe in treating children with upper urinary tract stones.

scholarly journals Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stone: a single institute experience

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-104
Author(s):  
Dhruba Bahadur Adhikari ◽  
David Shrestha ◽  
Anup Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Shock Wave ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy ◽  
Shock Wave Lithotripsy ◽  
Hounsfield Unit ◽  
Upper Urinary Tract ◽  
Stone Size ◽  
Extracorporeal Shock Wave ◽  
Urinary Tract Stone

Introduction: The aim of the study was to observe the success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the management of upper urinary tract stones. Materials and Methods: This retroprospective study was conducted in Pokhara Kidney stone Centre, Pokhara, Kaski, Nepal from January 2017 to January 2018. Seventy nine patients were selected in this study with upper urinary tract stone, size less than 20 mm. Results: Seventy four (93.67%) patients were successfully treated in initial use of shock wave and 5 (6.32%) patients required repetition. Conclusion: Overall satisfactory success rate was observed using ESWL for the upper urinary tract stone. Careful selection of patient, stone size and Hounsfield unit (HU) is advisable.

scholarly journals The Role of Antegrade Irrigation via Percutaneous Nephrostomy on Surgical Outcomes in Semirigid Ureteroscopy among Patients with Upper Ureteral Stones

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Wonho Jung ◽  
Hye Jin Byun ◽  
Dong Sup Lee
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract Infection ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Tract Infection ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrostomy ◽  
Stone Size ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Ureter Stones ◽  
Free Rate

Objective. We aimed to investigate the role of antegrade irrigation via percutaneous nephrostomy on surgical outcomes in retrograde ureteroscopy in patients with upper ureter stones. Materials and Methods. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 134 patients who underwent retrograde semirigid ureteroscopy for upper ureter stones between August 2012 and December 2017. Patients were divided into two groups: retrograde irrigation group (conventional URS) and antegrade irrigation group (using percutaneous nephrostomy). Operation time, postoperative hospital stay, complications, and stone-free rate were measured for each patient after ureteroscopy. Results. The mean age in the retrograde irrigation and antegrade irrigation groups was 53.3 and 60.7 years, respectively (p=0.007). The operation time was 60.8 min vs. 43.0 min (p=0.002), and stone-free rate was 82.0 % vs. 95.5 % (p=0.033). Stone size, laterality, the proportion of male patients, and urinary tract infection prevalence were comparable between the groups. In the subgroup analysis of stone size >10 mm, the antegrade irrigation group had a shorter operation time and a higher stone-free rate. For stone size of 5–10 mm, operation time in the antegrade irrigation group was shorter and the stone-free rate between the two groups was comparable. Conclusion. Antegrade irrigation via percutaneous nephrostomy during ureteroscopy has a higher stone-free rate with a shorter operation time without an increased urinary tract infection risk. Therefore, if percutaneous nephrostomy is necessary before ureteroscopy, antegrade irrigation of external fluid via percutaneous nephrostomy is strongly recommended.

scholarly journals The use of a ureteral access sheath does not improve stone-free rate after ureteroscopy for upper urinary tract stones

2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 229-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaetan Berquet ◽  
Paul Prunel ◽  
Grégory Verhoest ◽  
Romain Mathieu ◽  
Karim Bensalah
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Upper Urinary Tract ◽  
Ureteral Access Sheath ◽  
Access Sheath ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Urinary Tract Stones ◽  
Free Rate

scholarly journals Stone free rate and clinical complications in patients submitted to retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): Our experience in 571 consecutive cases

2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-317
Author(s):  
Orazio Maugeri ◽  
Ettore Dalmasso ◽  
Dario Peretti ◽  
Fabio Venzano ◽  
Germano Chiapello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laser Lithotripsy ◽  
Urinary Stones ◽  
Flexible Ureteroscopy ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery ◽  
Stone Size ◽  
Clinical Complications ◽  
Holmium Laser Lithotripsy ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Free Rate

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to report the stone free rate (SFR) and clinical complications in patients submitted to retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Materials and methods: A total of 571 procedures of upper urinary stones treated using flexible ureteroscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy from January 2014 to February 2020 have been analyzed. Overall SFR was evaluated after 3 months following the procedure by means of a non-contrast computed tomography. Success was considered as stone-free status or ≤ 0.4 cm fragments. Results: The overall SFR was 92.3% in group 1 (stone size: < 1 cm), 88.3% in group 2 (stone size: > 1 ≤ 2 cm), 56.7% in group 3 (stone size: 2-3 cm) and 69.6% in group 4 (multiple stones). Post-operative complications, according to the Clavien- Dindo (CD) classification system, were recorded in 32 (5.6%) procedures. The major complications recorded were: one case of subcapsular hematoma (SRH) associated with pulmonary embolism two days after the procedure (CD Grade IIIa) treated conservatively and one case of hemorrhagic shock 2 hour with multiple renal bleedings requiring urgent nephrectomy (CD Grade IVA). Conclusions: The RIRS is an effective and safe procedure with a high SFR significantly correlated with the stone size; at the same time, RIRS could be characterized by severe clinical complications that require rapid diagnosis and prompt treatment.

scholarly journals Comparative Study Between Holmium Laser versus Pneumatic Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Proximal Ureteric Stones Close to Pelvi-ureteric Junction (PUJ) -A Prospective Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-192
Author(s):  
Harun Or Rashid ◽  
Md Shahidul Islam ◽  
SM Shameem Waheed ◽  
Md Abdur Rakib ◽  
Md Ashif Chowdhury ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laser Lithotripsy ◽  
Stent Insertion ◽  
Stone Size ◽  
Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy ◽  
Secondary Intervention ◽  
Upward Migration ◽  
Ho:Yag Laser ◽  
Double J Stent ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Free Rate

Objective: To compare the outcomes of ureteroscopic lithotripsy with pneumatic lithotripter versus Holium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (Ho:YAG) laser in the management of upper ureteric stones. Materials and methods: Patients who underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy with pneumatic lithotripter or Ho:YAG laser for upper ureteric stones were reviewed. Patients with urinary tract infection, ,loss of follow-up, concurrent middle or lower third ureteral stones or acute renall failure were excluded. Patient age, stone size and burden (based on KUB or computerized tomography), stone upward migration, double J stent insertion rate, stone free rate and secondary intervention rate for residual stones were compared in both groups. Results: There were 70 patients with upper ureteric stones (35 in pneumatic group and 35 in laser group) meeting the study criteria. Patients’ age, gender, stone size and burden were similar in both groups. The Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy group had better stone free rate, less double J stent insertion rate and less upward migration and secondary intervention rate, sepsis as compared with pneumatic lithotripsy (94.2% vs. 60%; 85% vs. 100%; 5.7% vs 40%; 5.7% vs 34.2%; 2.8 vs 2.8 respectively, all p < 0.05). In patients with stones sizes 8-10 mm, Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy had significantly lower upward migration rate, lower double J stent insertion rate, higher stone free rate and less secondary intervention rate. Conclusions: Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy is better and much effective than pneumatic lithotripsy in the management of upper ureteric stones in terms of, stone free rate and secondary intervention rate for stones of sizes about 8 to 10 mm.Although the access of upper ureter is difficult but our small calibre (4.5 fr) ureteoscope and gentle manuevre have made the procedures safe and successful. Bangladesh Journal of Urology, Vol. 23, No. 2, July 2020 p.188-192

scholarly journals Intraoperative flexible nephroscopy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: An 8 years’ experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasir Masood ◽  
Nadeem Iqbal ◽  
Raja Mohsin Farooq ◽  
Sajid Iqbal ◽  
Faheemullah Khan
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Hounsfield Unit ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Stone Size ◽  
Group I ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Free Rate

Objectives: To see the effect of intra operative antegrade flexible nephroscopy during Percutaneous nephrolithotomy on stone free rate. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records of patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy from 2010 to 2017 for renal stones >2cm. Patients found eligible were divided in, Group-I who did not have intraoperative Flexible nephroscopy and Group-II who had flexible nephroscopy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. All procedures were done by senior consultants. Variables like Mean age, side, stone size, skin to stone distance and Hounsfield unit were compared. Outcomes like Stone free rate, hospital stay and operative time were compared between the groups. Results: The study included 248 patients, consisting 85 (34.3%) females and 163 (65.7%) males. Mean age ± SD was 45.8±13.8 years. Both group were similar in characteristics like mean age, stone size, skin to stone distance and Hounsfield units. The overall stone free rate was 71%. It was not significantly different between the groups, 76% in Group-II vs. 67% in Group-I. However stone free rate markedly improved with flexible nephroscopy in patients with staghorn calculi. Mean operative time and hospital stay were similar between the groups. Conclusions: Intraoperative flexible nephroscopy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy significantly increases stone free rate in patients with staghorn stones. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.3.3565 How to cite this:Masood Y, Iqbal N, Farooq RM, Iqbal S, Khan F. Intraoperative flexible nephroscopy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: An 8 years’ experience. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(3):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.3.3565 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Holmium laser lithotripsy with semirigid ureterorenoscopy in treatment of upper ureteral and renal pelvis stones under spinal anesthesia

2020 ◽  
pp. 205141582095643
Author(s):  
Bekir Aras ◽  
Okan Alkiş ◽  
Halil İ İvelik ◽  
Mehmet Sevim ◽  
Aykut Başer
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Renal Pelvis ◽  
Upper Urinary Tract ◽  
Laser Lithotripsy ◽  
Flexible Ureterorenoscopy ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Holmium Laser Lithotripsy ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Free Rate

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and especially flexible ureterorenoscopy (URS) are first-choice treatments of upper ureteral and renal pelvis stones. In our study, we aimed to demonstrate that the treatment of upper ureteral and renal pelvis stones smaller than 2 cm could be performed by semirigid URS under spinal anesthesia. The data of 292 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Stones were localized in upper ureter and renal pelvis in 191 (65.4%) and 101 (34.6%) patients, respectively. The stone-free rate was found to be 72.6%. The final stone-free rate was 95.2% after additional treatments administered to 80 patients with residues. While no peri-operative complication was observed, hematuria was observed in three patients during the post-operative period, high fever was observed in 27 patients and sepsis was observed in four patients. It is a well-known fact that flexible URS is the first-choice surgical method in the treatment of upper ureteral and renal pelvis stones. In the current study, we aimed to investigate whether laser lithotripsy with semirigid URS could also be a good and cheap alternative in clinical practice, and if upper urinary tract surgeries could be performed with spinal anesthesia especially in patients with a high risk of general anesthesia. Level of evidence:

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document