scholarly journals Patterns of household and personal care product use by the Korean population: implications for aggregate human exposure and health risk

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Jeong Han ◽  
KeunOh Choi ◽  
Seunghye Sim ◽  
Junyeong Choi ◽  
Yoonhee Uhm ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Household and personal care products (H&PCPs) are used frequently in the domestic environment. Different types of H&PCPs often contain the same chemicals and have potential for aggregate exposure. Therefore, product use patterns should be investigated to assess exposure and health risk. Results A nationwide survey was conducted in Korea to examine the use of 16 types of H&PCPs, to obtain data that can be used for such assessments. The initial analysis focused on identifying usage patterns, such as the frequency of use and amount of product used per application. Then, co-use in 16 product categories were analyzed. Family size, marital status and age were, respectively, recognized as the critical demographic factor for classification of the frequency of use in laundry products, cleaning products and shower products. In laundry products, cleaning products and shower products, frequent H&PCPs co-use patterns according to demographical factor were recognized. Chances of exposure of chemical ingredients to participants were investigated based on the usage of individual products. 32 chemicals among all investigated ingredients were identified to be potentially exposed to more than half of the participants, and 21 chemicals are classified above Class 4 in acute toxicity. Conclusions Personal preference was not observed both in the use frequency and the amount per application of H&PCPs, among all participants. Instead, household duties were found to be associated with the yearly use frequency of household care products. In addition, the yearly chemical profiles of individual consumer were obtained, and the chemicals that have multiple chances of exposure and concomitant health risk in daily life were identified. The results provide the overview of distribution of chemicals in daily life, and essential ground for aggregate exposure assessment in Korea.

2018 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 027011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyla W. Taylor ◽  
Melissa A. Troester ◽  
Amy H. Herring ◽  
Lawrence S. Engel ◽  
Hazel B. Nichols ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 458-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyla W Taylor ◽  
Donna D Baird ◽  
Amy H Herring ◽  
Lawrence S Engel ◽  
Hazel B Nichols ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luz María Sánchez-Romero ◽  
Christopher J. Cadham ◽  
Jana L. Hirschtick ◽  
Delvon T. Mattingly ◽  
Beomyoung Cho ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: With the increasing changes in tobacco use patterns, “current use” definition and the survey used may have important implications for monitoring population use trends. Methods: Using three US surveys (2014/15 TUS-CPS, NHIS and PATH), we compared the adult (age 18+) prevalence of four product groups (cigarettes, other combustibles, smokeless tobacco, and e-cigarettes) based on three past 30-day frequency of use thresholds: 1+, 10+, and 25+ days. We also examined mutually exclusive single, dual, and polytobacco users as a percentage of total users for each product group. Results: Regardless of threshold or product, the prevalence was higher in PATH followed by NHIS and TUS-CPS, in some cases by large percentages. The differences in cigarette and smokeless tobacco use prevalence in going from the 1+ to 10+ days and to the 25+ days threshold were minimal. Applying different frequency thresholds had the largest impact on other combustibles prevalence, with a 60% reduction with the 10+ days threshold and a 80% reduction with the 25+ days threshold, compared to the 1+ days threshold, followed by e-cigarettes with 40% and 60% reductions, respectively. The proportion of dual and polytobacco users decreased considerably when using the 10+ vs. the 1+ days threshold and polytobacco use was almost non-existent with the 25+ days threshold. Conclusion: The estimated prevalence of each tobacco product use depends largely on the survey and frequency of use threshold adopted. The choice of survey and frequency threshold merits serious consideration when monitoring patterns of tobacco use.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly P. Berger ◽  
Katherine R. Kogut ◽  
Asa Bradman ◽  
Jianwen She ◽  
Qi Gavin ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Carly Lang ◽  
Mandy Fisher ◽  
Angelica Neisa ◽  
Leona MacKinnon ◽  
Sandra Kuchta ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 99 ◽  
pp. 24-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Garcia-Hidalgo ◽  
N. von Goetz ◽  
M. Siegrist ◽  
K. Hungerbühler

2019 ◽  
Vol 695 ◽  
pp. 133855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Bellavia ◽  
Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón ◽  
Jennifer B. Ford ◽  
Myra Keller ◽  
John Petrozza ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document