scholarly journals Burden of oral anticoagulation in embolic stroke of undetermined source without atrial fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus K. Witte ◽  
Georgios Tsivgoulis ◽  
Matthew R. Reynolds ◽  
Stelios I. Tsintzos ◽  
Simon Eggington ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Recurrent Stroke ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Event ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Embolic Stroke ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Event Rates

Abstract Objective Prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) is challenging. The advent of safer anticoagulation in the form of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has prompted exploration of prophylactic anticoagulation for all ESUS patients, rather than anticoagulating just those with documented atrial fibrillation (AF). However, recent trials have failed to demonstrate a clinical benefit, while observing increased bleeding. We modeled the economic impact of anticoagulating ESUS patients without documented AF across multiple geographies. Methods CRYSTAL-AF trial data were used to assess ischaemic stroke event rates in ESUS patients confirmed AF-free after long-term monitoring. Anticipated bleeding event rates (including both minor and major bleeds) with aspirin, dabigatran 150 mg, and rivaroxaban 20 mg were sourced from published meta-analyses, whilst a 30% ischaemic stroke reduction for both DOACs was assumed. Cost data for clinical events and pharmaceuticals were collected from the local payer perspective. Results Compared with aspirin, dabigatran and rivaroxaban resulted in 17.9 and 29.9 additional bleeding events per 100 patients over a patient’s lifetime, respectively. Despite incorporating into our model the proposed 30% reduction in ischaemic stroke risk, both DOACs were cost-additive over patient lifetime, as the costs of bleeding events and pharmaceuticals outweighed cost savings associated with the reduction in ischaemic strokes. DOACs added £5953–£7018 per patient (UK), €6683–€7368 (Netherlands), €4933–€9378 (Spain), AUD$5353–6539 (Australia) and $26,768–$32,259 (US) of payer cost depending on the agent prescribed. Additionally, in the U.S. patient pharmacy co-payments ranged from $2468–$12,844 depending on agent and patient plan. In all settings, cost-savings could not be demonstrated even when the modelling assumed 100% protection from recurrent ischaemic strokes, due to the very low underlying risk of recurrent ischaemic stroke in this population (1.27 per 100 patient-years). Conclusions Anticoagulation of non-AF patients may cause excess bleeds and add substantial costs for uncertain benefits, suggesting a personalised approach to anticoagulation in ESUS patients.

scholarly journals Burden of Oral Anticoagulation in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source without Atrial Fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Witte ◽  
Georgios Tsivgoulis ◽  
Matthew Reynolds ◽  
Stelios Tsintzos ◽  
Simon Eggington ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Recurrent Stroke ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Event ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Embolic Stroke ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Event Rates

Abstract Objective: Prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) is challenging. The advent of safer anticoagulation in the form of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has prompted exploration of prophylactic anticoagulation for all ESUS patients, rather than anticoagulating just those with documented atrial fibrillation (AF). However, recent trials have failed to demonstrate a clinical benefit, while observing increased bleeding. We modeled the economic impact of anticoagulating ESUS patients without documented AF across multiple geographies.Methods: CRYSTAL-AF trial data were used to assess ischaemic stroke event rates in ESUS patients confirmed AF-free after long-term monitoring. Anticipated bleeding event rates (including both minor and major bleeds) with aspirin, dabigatran 150 mg, and rivaroxaban 20 mg were sourced from published meta-analyses, whilst a 30% ischaemic stroke reduction for both DOACs was assumed. Cost data for clinical events and pharmaceuticals were collected from the local payer perspective.Results: Compared with aspirin, dabigatran and rivaroxaban resulted in 17.9 and 29.9 additional bleeding events per 100 patients over a patient’s lifetime, respectively. Despite incorporating into our model the proposed 30% reduction in ischaemic stroke risk, both DOACs were cost-additive over patient lifetime, as the costs of bleeding events and pharmaceuticals outweighed cost savings associated with the reduction in ischaemic strokes. DOACs added £5,953-£7,018 per patient (UK), €6,683-€7,368 (Netherlands), €4,933-€9,378 (Spain), AUD$5,353-6,539 (Australia) and $26,768-$32,259 (US) of payer cost depending on the agent prescribed. Additionally, in the U.S. patient pharmacy co-payments ranged from $1,716-$12,473 depending on agent and patient plan. In all settings, cost-savings could not be demonstrated even when the modelling assumed 100% protection from recurrent ischaemic strokes, due to the very low underlying risk of recurrent ischaemic stroke in this population (1.27 per 100 patient-years).Conclusions: Anticoagulation of non-AF patients may cause excess bleeds and add substantial costs for uncertain benefits, suggesting a personalised approach to anticoagulation in ESUS patients.

Anticoagulation Changes Following Major and Clinically Relevant Nonmajor Bleeding Events in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 089719002110641
Author(s):  
Thane Feldeisen ◽  
Constantina Alexandris-Souphis ◽  
Brian Haymart ◽  
Xiaowen Kong ◽  
Eva Kline-Rogers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Drug Class ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Bleeding Event ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Anticoagulation Management ◽  
Anticoagulation Clinics ◽  
The Individual

Background Bleeding events are common complications of oral anticoagulant drugs, including both warfarin and the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Some patients have their anticoagulant changed or discontinued after experiencing a bleeding event, while others continue the same treatment. Differences in anticoagulation management between warfarin- and DOAC-treated patients following a bleeding event are unknown. Methods Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation from six anticoagulation clinics taking warfarin or DOAC therapy who experienced an International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH)-defined major or clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding event were identified between 2016 and 2020. The primary outcome was management of the anticoagulant following bleeding (discontinuation, change in drug class, and restarting of same drug class). DOAC- and warfarin-treated patients were propensity matched based on the individual elements of the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores as well as the severity of the bleeding event. Results Of the 509 patients on warfarin therapy and 246 on DOAC therapy who experienced a major or CRNM bleeding event, the majority of patients continued anticoagulation therapy. The majority of warfarin (231, 62.6%) and DOAC patients (201, 81.7%) restarted their previous anticoagulation. Conclusion Following a bleeding event, most patients restarted anticoagulation therapy, most often with the same type of anticoagulant that they previously had been taking.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Prescribing in Patients With Moderate to Severe Renal Impairment

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 107602962098790
Author(s):  
Clara Ting ◽  
Megan Rhoten ◽  
Jillian Dempsey ◽  
Hunter Nichols ◽  
John Fanikos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Severe Renal Impairment ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Increase Risk ◽  
Severe Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Dosing Strategies ◽  
Require Dose

Patients with renal impairment require dose adjustments for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), though there is uncertainty regarding their use in severe chronic kidney disease. Inappropriately dosed DOACs may increase risk of ischemic events when under-dosed, or risk of bleeding when over-dosed. The purpose of this study was to describe DOAC selection, dosing strategies, and associated clinical outcomes in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment at our institution. This was a single-center retrospective analysis of adult outpatients with moderate to severe renal impairment (estimated creatinine clearance <50 mL/min, including need for hemodialysis) who were prescribed a DOAC by a cardiologist between June 1, 2015 and December 1, 2018. Outcomes evaluated included the percentage of patients who received appropriate and inappropriate DOAC dosing, prescriber reasons for inappropriate DOAC dosing if documented, and incidence of thrombotic and bleeding events. A total of 207 patients were included. Overall, 61 (29.5%) patients received inappropriate dosing, with 43 (70.5%) being under-dosed and 18 (29.5%) being over-dosed as compared to FDA-labeled dosing recommendations for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism (VTE). By a median follow-up duration of 20 months, stroke occurred in 6 (3.3%) patients receiving DOACs for atrial fibrillation, and VTE occurred in 1 (4.3%) patient receiving a DOAC for VTE. International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 25 (12.1%) patients. Direct oral anticoagulants were frequently prescribed at off-label doses in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment, with a tendency toward under-dosing.

scholarly journals Anticoagulation Challenges in Hematogeriatrics: Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Vs Vitamin k Antagonist in Elderly with Atrial Fibrillation

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1162-1162
Author(s):  
Desirée Campoy ◽  
Gonzalo Artaza ◽  
César A Velasquez ◽  
Tania Canals ◽  
Erik A Johansson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Frail Elderly ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Bleeding Events

BACKGROUND Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are increasingly used in patients with Non Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) for stroke prevention. However, Follow-Up (FU) and dosing these agents in the elderly can be challenging due to different factors, such as chronic kidney disease, frailty, falls, multifactorial anemia and concomitant polypharmacy. These factors in elderly patients predisposes to both thromboembolic and bleeding events once atrial fibrillation occurs. Therefore, balancing risks and benefits of antithrombotic strategies in older populations is crucial. Despite recent increases in DOAC use in NVAF, there are still limited data regarding DOACs effectiveness and safety in frail elderly patients. AIM To assess the effectiveness and safety according to DOAC or Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA) in a cohort of elderly patients with NVAF. METHODS From April 2016 to April 2019, we consecutively included NVAF elderly patients (≥80 years-old) treated with DOAC or VKA in a prospective multicenter registry. Demographic, laboratory, frailty risk stratification and antithrombotic therapy data were collected. Patients had a minimum FU of 6 months. VKA patients had a standard FU through digital international normalized ratio (INR) control and the efficacy of therapy was determined by the time in therapeutic range (TTR) values from the preceding 6 months of treatment using Rosendaal's method. FU in DOAC patients was performed through structured and integral assessment following the Tromboc@t Working Group recommendations for management in patients receiving DOAC (Olivera et al, Med Clin 2018). Key practical management aspects are listed in the flow chart (Figure 1). Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS score) was assigned to each patient at the beginning and during the FU; patients were classified into three categories: non-frail (CFS 1-4), mild-to-moderately frail (CFS 5-6), and severely frail (CFS 7-9). RESULTS From a total of 1040 NVAF patients, 690 (63.5%) were treated with DOAC (61 dabigatran, 95 rivaroxaban, 254 edoxaban and 280 apixaban) and 350 with VKA. In the VKA group, the mean TTR was 52.8%. Demographic characteristics and CFS score are summarized in table 1. Kaplan-Meier analysis (median FU: 16.5 months) showed a significantly high incidence of stroke/systemic embolism among VKA patients vs DOAC patients (4.2 vs 0.5 events per 100 patient-years, p<0.001). Major bleeding in the DOAC group was significantly infrequent compared with VKA group (2.2 vs 8.9 events, p=0.001). In the DOAC group, 90% (n=20/22) of the major bleedings were gastrointestinal [16 rivaroxaban and 4 edoxaban]. However, in the VKA group 64% (n = 20/31) were gastrointestinal, 25.8% (n= 8/31) intracranial and 9.7% (n = 3/31) urogenital bleedings. We identified 365 very elderly patients (aged ≥ 90 years) of which 270 (39.1%) were DOAC patients and 95 (27.1%) VKA patients. In this subgroup of patients, after a multivariate regression analysis, the stroke/systemic embolism incidence was similar in both treatment groups regardless of the age, but major bleeding decreased significantly in DOAC group (adjusted HR 0.247, 95% CI 0.091-0.664). CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that DOACs can be a good therapeutic option for stroke/systemic embolism prevention in frail elderly patients, showing low rates of stroke as well as bleeding events when a structured and integral FU is applied to anticoagulated patients. Further investigations are necessary to analyze the impact in the quality of life and net clinical benefit of anticoagulant therapy when a FU program is applied in elderly patients. Disclosures Sierra: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Safety and timing of resuming dabigatran after major gastrointestinal bleeding reversed by idarucizumab

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 2050313X1775333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gian Galeazzo Riario Sforza ◽  
Francesco Gentile ◽  
Fabio Stock ◽  
Francesco Caggiano ◽  
Enrica Chiocca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Acute Treatment ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Oral Vitamin ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Massive Rectal Bleeding

The recent introduction of direct oral anticoagulants, including rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, and edoxaban, for the acute treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism and in atrial fibrillation has been shown to provide greater clinical benefit than oral vitamin K antagonists. However, direct oral anticoagulants are associated with adverse events, the most common being major bleeding; such events require the reversal of the anticoagulant effects by specific agents. In this case report, we describe an 87-year-old female with atrial fibrillation treated with dabigatran who had massive rectal bleeding. Idarucizumab 5 g (2 × 2.5 g/50 mL) was successfully used to reverse dabigatran effect; subsequent to this, treatment with dabigatran was resumed, and there were no further bleeding events. This suggests that dabigatran can be safely restarted after major bleeding, but this outcome needs to be confirmed in studies involving larger groups of patients.

P1860Unfractionated heparin dose and complication rate in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation, a comparison between uninterrupted therapy with phenprocoumon and direct oral anticoagulants

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Poci ◽  
D Gjermeni ◽  
V Kuehlkamp
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Anticoagulation Management ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Initial Bolus

Abstract Background Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is known for the combining risks of thromboembolism (TE) and major bleedings. This urges a better understanding and optimization of the intraprocedural anticoagulation management. Differences in unfractionated heparin (UFH) requirements and anticoagulation time (ACT) levels between patients on different uninterrupted oral anticoagulation (OAC) agents have been studied. However, the clinical relevance, in terms of periprocedural TE and bleeding events, of UFH administration according to ACT monitoring among patients on different OAC agents, needs to be addressed. Objective To evaluate how the ACT monitoring and differences in intraprocedural UFH requirements among different anticoagulant agents, may translate to clinical outcome, in terms of periprocedural incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events. Methods We retrospectively studied 1571 cases who underwent catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation between January 2011 and May 2017. Cases were on an uninterrupted oral OAC therapy of Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA)(713), Rivaroxaban (RG)(385), Dabigatran (DG)(260), Apixaban (AG)(192) and Edoxaban (EG)(21). First ACT measurements after the initial bolus of UFH (1ehz748.0610U), mean ACT measurements, total UFH doses/kg (Body Weight)/min (duration of procedure) and incidence of major periprocedural events were compared among the above OAC groups. Results The mean ACT (sec) was significantly lower in the AG and greater in the VKA (313,7±47 vs 340,5±49, p<0,001). Significantly lower UFH doses (U/kg/min) were required to reach the target ACT in VKA compared to RG, DG, AG and EG (0,69±0,4 vs 1,41±0,76; 1,42±0,7; 1,63±0,8; 1,37±0,4 respectively, p<0,001) The proportion of patients who achieved a target ACT value within 30 minutes after the fixed first UFH Bolus of 10 000 U was significantly lower in DG and AG compared to VKA, EG and RG group (51,5% and 49% vs 53%, 71,4%, and 61,8% respectively p=0,005). The incidence of periprocedural TE events and bleedings showed no significant difference among OAC groups. However, the 22 patients with a periprocedural TE event had significantly lower UFH doses (U)/ Duration of catheter ablation (min) compared to the ones without periprocedural TE (62,71±44,5 vs 94,4±66,4, p=0,026), despite equivalent mean ACT values between these two groups. Patients with a periprocedural TE had also a significantly older Age (69,6±10 vs 64±10 p=0,01, higher CHADSVASC Score (3,64±1,76 vs 2,63±1,7 p=0,006), longer duration of procedure (188,9±79,1 vs 144,9±57 p=0,0001) and higher pre-Ablation INR values (2,2±0,6 vs 1,7±0,6 p=0,002). Conclusions The average UFH doses required to reach the target ACT were lower in VKA than in NOAC- groups. The incidence of periprocedural TE events and bleedings was equivalent among OAC groups. Patients with TE showed a lower UFH requirement compared to no-TE group, with both groups having mean ACT ≥300 sec.

scholarly journals 122 Are We Effective Prescribers? A Retrospective Audit of DOAC Prescribing Post Embolic Stroke for Non Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii17-iii65
Author(s):  
Karen Dennehy ◽  
Joseph Morris ◽  
Diarmaid Hughes ◽  
Kate Donlon ◽  
Thomas Walsh
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Embolic Stroke ◽  
Haemorrhagic Transformation ◽  
Retrospective Audit ◽  
Online Laboratory ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are indicated for stroke prophylaxis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, which is responsible for up to 20% of all ischaemic strokes(1). We performed a retrospective audit of all consecutive stroke patients in an Irish teaching hospital over a 1-year period to investigate the rate of incorrect dosing and any risk factors for this occurring. Methods We assessed our hospital stroke database from January to December 2017. Our research focused on DOAC prescribing in non valvular atrial fibrillation post embolic stroke. We collected data on baseline characteristics, choice of anticoagulation, dosing, and assessment of renal function, with follow up renal function if available. We reviewed electronic discharge summaries, online laboratory systems and completed a chart review. Results There was a total of 116 people with atrial fibrillation who developed an embolic stroke in our centre, of which 68 were eligible for anticoagulation using a DOAC (59). The main reasons for omission were CKD and haemorrhagic transformation. Patients were discharged on either Apixaban (32 patients), Rivaroxoban (32 patients), or Dabigatran (4 patients). Following our review, we established that 54/68 (79%) of patients were correctly anticoagulated. Over 20% of patients were incorrectly dosed and there was a clear tendency to under-dose 13/14 (93%). There were significant differences between the correct and incorrect dosing groups, with the latter group of patients being older and more at risk of polypharmacy. Renal function did not differ significantly between the groups at discharge or follow up and none of the incorrectly dosed patients were on a concurrent anti platelet. Conclusion A significant number of patients prescribed DOAC in hospital were not appropriately anticoagulated (21%), a majority of which were under-dosed. The patients who were under-dosed were older and more likely to be on 5 or more medications.

P1898Prevalence and risk of DOACs inappropriate dosing in atrial fibrillation. An analysis of the Swiss-AF and BEAT-AF registries

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Montrasio ◽  
M Coslovsky ◽  
A Wiencierz ◽  
C Baumgartner ◽  
N Rodondi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Event ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Off Label ◽  
Kaplan Meier

Abstract Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have a similar efficacy in terms of stroke and mortality reduction as compared to Vitamin K-Antagonists (VKAs) and improved safety with regards to intracranial haemorrhage in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Dose of DOACs needs to be adjusted according to age, weight, renal function and concomitant medication. Yet, off-label dosages have been reported in 11 - 45% of patients (on average 20%). Purpose To assess the prevalence of inappropriate DOAC-dosing according to the official prescribing information in two large prospective Swiss AF cohorts (Swiss-AF and BEAT-AF) and to evaluate its correlation with adverse clinical outcomes. Methods All 3267 patients taking oral anticoagulants were stratified at baseline as receiving DOACs (adequately dosed, under- or overdosed) or VKAs. Appropriateness of DOAC dosing was assessed based on age (≥80 years), weight (≤60kg) and renal function (serum creatinine ≥133μmol/l [apixaban]; creatinine clearence ≤50ml/min [all other DOACs]). Clinical outcomes were collected during a median follow-up of 2.96 years. Major adverse clinical events (MACE) consisted of a combination of myocardial infarction, cardiac death, ischemic stroke and systemic embolism. Safety was assessed by occurrence of any bleeding event. Results 1902 patients (58%) were on VKAs and 1365 on DOACs (42%). In the DOAC group, 1149 patients received a dose consistent with drug labelling (84%), 133 (10%) received an inappropriately high and 83 (6%) an inappropriately low dose. Overdosed patients were older than those adequately treated and more likely female, had a lower BMI and a higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (4 vs. 3 points) (p<0.001 for all). Underdosed patients were more likely to have concomitant antiplatelet therapy (p<0.001). Both off-label groups were more likely to have a history of coronary artery disease, heart failure and chronic kidney disease (p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidence rates for the first occurrence of MACE or bleedings are provided in Figure 1. Overdosed patients had an almost two-fold higher risk of bleeding (9.0 vs. 5.0 events per 100 patient-years compared to correctly dosed DOACs and to VKAs) and a higher rate of MACE (5.1 vs. 2.3 events per 100 patient years compared to correctly dosed DOACs and 5.1 vs. 3.4 compared to VKAs). Underdosing did not seem to be associated with a relevant increase in ischemic or bleeding events as compared to correctly dosed DOACs and VKAs (see Figure 1). Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier incidence curves Conclusion Inadequate DOACs dosing was found in 1 in 6 patients and correlated with a higher burden of comorbidities at baseline. Underdosing correlated with concomitant antiplatelet therapy. Overdosing was associated with adverse clinical outcome for ischemic and bleeding events.

P675Current status of anticoagulation in patients with breast cancer and atrial fibrillation

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Pardo Sanz ◽  
L M Rincon ◽  
P Guedes Ramallo ◽  
L Belarte ◽  
G De Lara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Oncologic Patients

Abstract Aims Balance between embolic and bleeding risk is challenging in patients with cancer. There is a lack of specific recommendations for the use of antithrombotic therapy in oncologic patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We compared the embolic and bleeding risk, the preventive management and the incidence of events between patients with and without cancer. We further evaluated the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) within patients with cancer. Methods The AMBER-AF registry is an observational multicentre study that analysed patients with non-valvular AF treated in Oncology and Cardiology Departments in Spain. 1237 female patients with AF were enrolled: 637 with breast cancer and 599 without cancer. Mean follow-up was 3.1 years. Results Both groups were similar in age, CHA2DS2-VASc and HASB-LED scores. Lack of guidelines recommended therapies was more frequent among patients with cancer. Compared with patients without cancer, adjusted rates of stroke (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) in cancer patients were higher (1.56 [1.04–2.35]), whereas bleeding rates remained similar (1.25 [0.95–1.64]). Within the group of patients with cancer, the use of DOACs vs VKAs did not entail differences in the adjusted rates of stroke (0.91 [0.42–1.99]) or severe bleedings (1.53 [0.93–2.53]). Follow-up events Conclusions Antithrombotic management of AF frequently differs in patients with breast cancer. While breast cancer is associated with a higher risk of incident stroke, bleeding events remained similar. Patients with cancer treated with DOACs experienced similar rates of stroke and bleeding as those with VKAs.

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Extremes Weights

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 12-13
Author(s):  
Julie Huang ◽  
Jamie Chin ◽  
Alexander Hindenburg ◽  
Lilia Davenport ◽  
Debra Willner
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Atrial Flutter ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Design And Methods ◽  
Anticoagulated Patients

Background: The clinical use of Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), as opposed to warfarin, has become more prevalent in patients with extremes in body weight. However, both the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis' (ISTH) and anti-thrombotic therapy guidelines state that DOACs should be avoided in patients with a body mass index (BMI) &gt;40 kg/m2, weight &gt;120 kg, or weight &lt; 50 kg. The purpose of this study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of DOACs in extremes of weight compared to patients treated with warfarin. Warfarin may be a safer and more effective oral anticoagulant for patients in extremes of weight, due to the availability of dosing based on INR. DOAC standard dosing may either overdose/underdose in patients with low/high BMI respectively. Study Design and Methods: A retrospective, single-institution study evaluated patients with extreme weights receiving a DOAC or warfarin for either venous thromboembolism (VTE) or atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter between October 2016 and October 2020. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients admitted to NYU Langone Hospitals continued on a DOAC or warfarin for VTE or atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter with BMI &lt; 18 kg/m2 or BMI &gt; 30 kg/m2. Patients newly initiated on oral anticoagulation or received anticoagulation other than atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter or VTE were excluded. Primary endpoints include incidence of VTE or bleeding events in anticoagulated patients who meet extreme weight criteria. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document