scholarly journals Gap between desired and self-determined roles of general practitioners: a multicentre questionnaire study in Japan

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Chinen ◽  
Yusuke Sasabuchi ◽  
Kazuhiko Kotani ◽  
Hironori Yamaguchi

Abstract Background Primary care physicians have diverse responsibilities. To collaborate with cancer specialists efficiently, they should prioritise roles desired by other collaborators rather than roles based on their own beliefs. No previous studies have reported the priority of roles such clinic-based general practitioners are expected to fulfil across the cancer care continuum. This study clarified the desired roles of clinic-based general practitioners to maximise person-centred cancer care. Methods A web-based multicentre questionnaire in Japan was distributed to physicians in 2019. Physician roles within the cancer care continuum were divided into 12 categories, including prevention, diagnosis, surgery, follow-up with cancer survivors, chemotherapy, and palliative care. Responses were evaluated by the proportion of three high-priority items to determine the expected roles of clinic-based general practitioners according to responding physicians in similarly designated roles. Results Seventy-eight departments (25% of those recruited) from 49 institutions returned questionnaires. Results revealed that some physicians had lower expectations for clinic-based general practitioners to diagnose cancer, and instead expected them to provide palliative care. However, some physicians expected clinic-based general practitioners to be involved in some treatment and survivorship care, though the clinic-based general practitioners did not report the same priority. Conclusion Clinic-based general practitioners prioritised involvement in prevention, diagnoses, and palliative care across the cancer continuum, although lower expectations were placed on them than they thought. Some additional expectations of their involvement in cancer treatment and survivorship care were unanticipated by them. These gaps represent issues that should be addressed.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (32) ◽  
pp. 4151-4157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya-Chen Tina Shih ◽  
Patricia A. Ganz ◽  
Denise Aberle ◽  
Amy Abernethy ◽  
Justin Bekelman ◽  
...  

The national cost of cancer care is projected to reach $173 billion by 2020, increasing from $125 billion in 2010. This steep upward cost trajectory has placed enormous an financial burden on patients, their families, and society as a whole and raised major concern about the ability of the health care system to provide and sustain high-quality cancer care. To better understand the cost drivers of cancer care and explore approaches that will mitigate the problem, the National Cancer Policy Forum of the Institute of Medicine held a workshop entitled “Delivering Affordable Cancer Care in the 21st Century” in October 2012. Workshop participants included bioethicists, health economists, primary care physicians, and medical, surgical, and radiation oncologists, from both academic and community settings. All speakers expressed a sense of urgency about the affordability of cancer care resulting from the future demographic trend as well as the high cost of emerging cancer therapies and rapid diffusion of new technologies in the absence to evidence indicating improved outcomes for patients. This article is our summary of presentations at the workshop that highlighted the overuse and underuse of screening, treatments, and technologies throughout the cancer care continuum in oncology practice in the United States.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10101-10101
Author(s):  
Jeremy Warner ◽  
Suzanne E Maddux ◽  
Jeff Brown ◽  
John Turner Hamm ◽  
John C. Krauss ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 163s-163s
Author(s):  
N. Lasebikan ◽  
N. Iloanusi ◽  
T. Onyeka ◽  
C. Ilo ◽  
K. Nwankwo ◽  
...  

Background and context: Early detection and improved treatments are associated with a reduction in breast cancer mortality and morbidity. UNTH is a leading comprehensive cancer center in Nigeria with referrals from the entire southeast and south south regions. Our goal is to offer high quality comprehensive cancer care services across the cancer care continuum from public health awareness campaigns and provision of screening services all the way to palliative care and survivorship. This is the first attempt by any institution in the country to standardize and harmonize available treatment options for breast cancer. Aim: To optimize, standardize and harmonize treatment options and management strategies for breast cancer using a multidisciplinary approach by developing guidelines adapted to our peculiar infrastructure and health system. Strategy/Tactics: The practice guideline was specifically developed for UNTH using a multidisciplinary approach and taking into consideration circumstances peculiar to UNTH, including the following: UNTH's specific patient population; UNTH's services and structure; and UNTH's clinical information. Program/Policy process: The process used recognized methods that are robust, objective, scientifically valid, consistent and adaptable to UNTH and engaged all identified multisectoral and multidisciplinary stakeholders involved in the care of patients with breast cancer. Outcomes: We reviewed substantial evidence on documented and proven strategies for community screening and prevention, less expensive and only marginally less effective diagnostic tools, locoregional and systemic therapies for the management of breast cancer. The team also recommended all patients receive psycho-oncology support through a dedicated team and through the breast cancer support group. It was agreed that palliative care be incorporated within the first 8 weeks of commencing treatment in line with the current ASCO guidelines and receive consultation from the exercise immunology unit. What was learned: Institutionalized care offers better management strategies and standardized treatment in line with best global practices of care for patients with breast cancer across the cancer care continuum which will ultimately translate to better treatment outcomes.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 (44) ◽  
pp. 2-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. H. Taplin ◽  
R. Anhang Price ◽  
H. M. Edwards ◽  
M. K. Foster ◽  
E. S. Breslau ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 (44) ◽  
pp. 11-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Zapka ◽  
S. H. Taplin ◽  
P. Ganz ◽  
E. Grunfeld ◽  
K. Sterba

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garden Lee ◽  
Han Sang Kim ◽  
Si Won Lee ◽  
Eun Hwa Kim ◽  
Bori Lee ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Although early palliative care is associated with a better quality of life and improved outcomes in end-of-life cancer care, the criteria of palliative care referral are still elusive. Methods: We collected patient-reported symptoms using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) at the baseline, first, and second follow-up visit. The ESAS evaluates ten symptoms: pain, fatigue, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, dyspnea, sleep disorder, appetite, and wellbeing. A total of 71 patients were evaluable, with a median age of 65 years, male (62%), and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status distribution of 1/2/3 (28%/39%/33%), respectively. Results: Twenty (28%) patients had moderate/severe symptom burden with the mean ESAS ≥5. Interestingly, most of the patients with moderate/severe symptom burdens (ESAS ≥5) had globally elevated symptom expression. While the mean ESAS score was maintained in patients with mild symptom burden (ESAS<5; 2.7 at the baseline; 3.4 at the first follow-up; 3.0 at the second follow-up; P =0.117), there was significant symptom improvement in patients with moderate/severe symptom burden (ESAS≥5; 6.5 at the baseline; 4.5 at the first follow-up; 3.6 at the second follow-up; P <0.001). Conclusions: Advanced cancer patients with ESAS ≥5 may benefit from outpatient palliative cancer care. Prescreening of patient-reported symptoms using ESAS can be useful for identifying unmet palliative care needs in advanced cancer patients.


Immunity ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 1077-1080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth A. Helmink ◽  
Pierre-Olivier Gaudreau ◽  
Jennifer A. Wargo

2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (sup1) ◽  
pp. 15-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Squiers ◽  
Lila J. Finney Rutten ◽  
Katherine Treiman ◽  
Mary Anne Bright ◽  
Bradford Hesse

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 84-84
Author(s):  
Taro Tomizuka ◽  
Tomone Watanabe ◽  
Satoru Kamitani ◽  
Takahiro Higashi

84 Background: To improve coordination of cancer care between cancer specialist hospitals and primary care providers (PCPs), the Japanese government accredited cancer specialist hospitals, so called “designated cancer care hospitals (DCCHs)” and introduced “Cancer care coordination instruction fee” which PCPs can receive if they share a cancer critical path (Japanese version of Survivorship Care Plans) of each cancer patient with DCCHs. We sought to assess the current status of coordination of cancer care in Japan and communication between DCCHs and PCPs from PCPs’ point of view. Methods: A cross-sectional mail survey was administered to randomly selected clinic-based PCPs (4,000 clinics) from a nation-wide database of medical institutions authorized by Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Japan to treat patients with health insurance (87,869 clinics). The survey evaluated how much PCPs provided cancer follow-up care and how well DCCHs coordinated care and communicated with PCPs in cancer survivorship. Results: 1,873 PCPs returned the questionnaire (response rate: 46.8%). 1,223 (65.3%) answered to provide cancer follow-up care in outpatient setting. Most of the PCPs which provided cancer follow-up care evaluated the care coordination and support by DCCHs were satisfactory (946, 77.4%) but the degree of good evaluation varied by region (highest: 91.3%, lowest: 45.8%). In regression analysis, provision of palliative care by PCPs (OR 1.52 95%CI 1.05-2.17) and use of cancer critical path (OR 2.10 95%CI 1.63-2.71) were significantly correlated with better evaluation of communication and care coordination. Conclusions: DCCHs communicated well with PCPs and PCPs were satisfied with the communication and care coordination by DCCHs. Provision of palliative care by PCPs and use of cancer critical path are likely to lead good care coordination in cancer care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document