scholarly journals Chewing gum for intestinal function recovery after caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zunjia Wen ◽  
Meifen Shen ◽  
Chao Wu ◽  
Jianping Ding ◽  
Binbin Mei
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Binbin Mei ◽  
Wenting Wang ◽  
Feifei Cui ◽  
Zunjia Wen ◽  
Meifen Shen

Background. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of chewing gum in intestinal function recovery after colorectal cancer surgery. Methods. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Science Direct, and Cochrane library for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until April 2017. Summary risk ratios or weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were used for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. Results. 17 RCTs with a total number of 1845 patients were included. Gum chewing following colorectal cancer surgery significantly reduced the time to first passage of flatus (WMD −0.55; 95% CI −0.94 to −0.16; P=0.006), first bowel movement (WMD −0.60; 95% CI −0.87 to −0.33; P<0.0001), start feeding (WMD −1.32; 95% CI −2.18 to −0.46; P=0.003), and the length of postoperative hospital stay (WMD −0.88; 95% CI −1.59 to −0.17; P=0.01), but no obvious differences were found in postoperative nausea, vomiting, abdominal distention, pneumonia, and mortality, which were consistent with the findings of intention to treat analysis. Conclusions. Chewing gum could accelerate the recovery of intestinal function after colorectal cancer surgery. However, it confers no advantage in postoperative clinical complications. Further large-scale and high-quality RCTs should be conducted to confirm these results.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean F. Hamel ◽  
Charles Sabbagh ◽  
Arnaud Alves ◽  
Jean M. Regimbeau ◽  
Timothée Vignaud ◽  
...  

AbstractDespite a significant improvement with enhanced recovery programmes (ERP), gastro-intestinal (GI) functions that are impaired after colorectal resection and postoperative ileus (POI) remain a significant issue. In the literature, there is little evidence of the distinction between the treatment assessed within or outside ERP. The purpose was to evaluate the efficiency of treatments to reduce POI and improve GI function recovery within ERP. A search was performed in PubMed and Scopus on 20 September 2019. The studies were included if they compared the effect of the administration of a treatment aiming to treat or prevent POI or improve the early functional outcomes of colorectal surgery within an ERP. The main outcome measures were the occurrence of postoperative ileus, time to first flatus and time to first bowel movement. Treatments that were assessed at least three times were included in a meta-analysis. Among the analysed studies, 28 met the eligibility criteria. Six of them focused on chewing-gum and were only randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 8 of them focused on Alvimopan but none of them were RCT. The other measures were assessed in less than 3 studies over RCTs (n = 11) or retrospective studies (n = 2). In the meta-analysis, chewing gum had no significant effect on the endpoints and Alvimopan allowed a significant reduction of the occurrence of POI. Chewing-gum was not effective on GI function recovery in ERP but Alvimopan and the other measures were not sufficiently studies to draw conclusion. Randomised controlled trials are needed.Systematic review registration number CRD42020167339.


2016 ◽  
Vol 78 ◽  
pp. 102-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mostafa Hosseini ◽  
Mahmoud Yousefifard ◽  
Masoud Baikpour ◽  
Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar ◽  
Farinaz Nasirinezhad ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. e0208725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Yang ◽  
Xia Zhao ◽  
Yilei Yang ◽  
Xin Huang ◽  
Hongjian Li ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document