scholarly journals Expression of RET is associated with Oestrogen receptor expression but lacks prognostic significance in breast cancer

BMC Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Mechera ◽  
Savas D. Soysal ◽  
Salvatore Piscuoglio ◽  
Charlotte K. Y. Ng ◽  
Jasmin Zeindler ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Areeg Faggad ◽  
Jan Budczies ◽  
Oleg Tchernitsa ◽  
Silvia Darb-Esfahani ◽  
Jalid Sehouli ◽  
...  

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 939
Author(s):  
Young Ju Jeong ◽  
Hoon Kyu Oh ◽  
Hye Ryeon Choi ◽  
Sung Hwan Park

Cluster of differentiation (CD) 73, which is encoded by the NT5E gene, regulates production of immunosuppressive adenosine and is an emerging checkpoint in cancer immunotherapy. Despite the significance of CD73 in immuno-oncology, the roles of the NT5E gene methylation in breast cancer have not been well-defined yet. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of the NT5E gene methylation in breast cancer. The DNA methylation status of the NT5E gene was analyzed using pyrosequencing in breast cancer tissues. In addition, the levels of inflammatory markers and lymphocyte infiltration were evaluated. The mean methylation level of the NT5E gene was significantly higher in breast cancer than in normal breast tissues. In the analysis of relevance with clinicopathologic characteristics, the mean methylation levels of the NT5E gene were significantly higher in patients with large tumor size, high histologic grade, negative estrogen receptor expression, negative Bcl-2 expression, and premenopausal women. There was no difference in disease-free survival according to the methylation status of the NT5E gene. We found that the NT5E gene methylation was related to breast cancer development and associated with poor prognostic factors in breast cancer. Our results suggest that the NT5E gene methylation has potential as an epigenetic biomarker in breast cancer.


2009 ◽  
Vol 175 (1) ◽  
pp. 334-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janna Paulsson ◽  
Tobias Sjöblom ◽  
Patrick Micke ◽  
Fredrik Pontén ◽  
Göran Landberg ◽  
...  

Oncogene ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 1053-1059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rina Hui ◽  
Jonathon R Ball ◽  
R Douglas Macmillan ◽  
Frances S Kenny ◽  
Owen WJ Prall ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 110 (7) ◽  
pp. 1744-1747 ◽  
Author(s):  
C L Downey ◽  
S A Simpkins ◽  
J White ◽  
D L Holliday ◽  
J L Jones ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 536-540
Author(s):  
Arshi Khan ◽  
Reeni Malik ◽  
Pramila Jain ◽  
Deepshikha Verma ◽  
Vedanti Newasker

BACKGROUND Understanding various risk factors associated with breast cancer can help in early identification & prompt treatment of patients with breast cancer. Apart from clinical parameters like age, disease presentation and menopausal status, important prognostic indicators in histopathology are size and extent of tumour, histologic type,histologic grade and lymph node status. Also, there are other factors which are not only predictive of outcome, but also direct therapies against particular molecular targets. These factors are oestrogen receptor (ER) status, progesterone receptor (PR) status, HER2 / neu status, Ki-67 proliferation index & androgen receptor (AR) status. We wanted to analyse various hormone receptors & their correlation with prognostic factors. In addition, androgen receptor expression is also studied in triple negative breast cancer cases. METHODS The study included 50 cases over a period of 18 months from January 2018 to June 2019 received in the Department of Pathology, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, India. These cases were subjected to histopathological & immunohistochemistry (IHC) evaluation. RESULTS Among the 50 cases studied, the most common subtype was infiltrating ductal carcinoma (NOS - no special type, 84 %). Majority of patients were ER, PR, HER2 / neu negative (48 %) and among those triple negative cases, 25 % of cases were androgen receptor positive. CONCLUSIONS Expression of the hormone receptor (ER and PR) and HER2 status may provide significant information in directing patient management. Since traditional pathological methods and IHC remain standard for guiding the use of treatment, clinicians may be challenged with equivocal results that directs towards additional testing for definitive diagnosis and, better patient outcome. The most used therapy for advanced breast cancers is based on the use of AR antagonists, such as bicalutamide and enzalutamide, first- and second-generation AR antagonists respectively. Gene signatures, bioinformatics, and other clinical trials are also beneficial for clinician in estimating the benefits expected from adjuvant chemotherapy. KEY WORDS Breast Cancer, Oestrogen Receptor, Androgen Receptor, Triple Negative


2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 536-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Robertson ◽  
E. Gutteridge ◽  
K. L. Cheung ◽  
S. Pinder ◽  
A. Wakeling

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document