scholarly journals Current state of esophageal cancer surgery in China: a national database analysis

BMC Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Lian Qiu ◽  
Jian-Bo Lin ◽  
Xu Li ◽  
Rong-Gang Luo ◽  
Bo Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The present standard of surgical treatment for esophageal cancer is country dependent. The aim of the present study was to investigate the basic aspects of surgical procedures performed for esophageal cancer, and provide information about the present state of esophageal cancer surgery in China. Methods Data were obtained from a database administered by the Chinese Ministry for Health. A total of 542 participating hospitals were divided into seven geographic areas, and 10% of hospitals in each area were randomly chosen for inclusion. All patients with esophageal cancer, who underwent esophagectomy in these participating hospitals from January 1 to December 31, 2015, were included in the present study. The clinical characteristics, stage of tumor at diagnosis, operation summary and outcomes, and histological findings of patients were extracted and analyzed. Results The present study included 11,791 patients, and the average number of patients per hospital was 218. Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common pathological type, while the mid-esophagus was the most common location. Open procedures were performed in 63.8% of patients, while minimally invasive esophagectomy was performed in 36.2% of patients. Multiple approaches to transthoracic esophagectomy were utilized. Two-field lymphadenectomy was the most frequently performed (64.8%), followed by three-field lymphadenectomy (21.8%). Gastric tubes, thoracic duct ligation and postoperative enteral nutrition were implemented to minimize complications. Conclusion The standard operative procedure and detailed technique for esophageal carcinoma surgery is presently being debated in China. This survey provides some basic information about the present state of esophageal cancer surgery countrywide.

Author(s):  
Keita Takahashi ◽  
Katsunori Nishikawa ◽  
Yuichiro Tanishima ◽  
Yoshitaka Ishikawa ◽  
Takahiro Masuda ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 271-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uberto Fumagalli ◽  
Maurizio Bersani ◽  
Antonio Russo ◽  
Alessandra Melis ◽  
Stefano de Pascale ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 1510-1512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burkhard H.A. von Rahden ◽  
Hubert J. Stein ◽  
Georg Schmidt ◽  
Holger Bartels ◽  
Matthias Overbeck ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 619-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Aiko ◽  
Yutaka Yoshizumi ◽  
Takamitsu Ishizuka ◽  
Takuya Horio ◽  
Takashi Sakano ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Marianne C Kalff ◽  
Mark I van Berge Henegouwen ◽  
Suzanne S Gisbertz

Summary Textbook outcome for esophageal cancer surgery is a composite quality measure including 10 short-term surgical outcomes reflecting an uneventful perioperative course. Achieved textbook outcome is associated with improved long-term survival. This study aimed to update the original textbook outcome based on international consensus. Forty-five international expert esophageal cancer surgeons received a personal invitation to evaluate the 10 items in the original textbook outcome for esophageal cancer surgery and to rate 18 additional items divided over seven subcategories for their importance in the updated textbook outcome. Items were included in the updated textbook outcome if ≥80% of the respondents agreed on inclusion. In case multiple items within one subcategory reached ≥80% agreement, only the most inclusive item with the highest agreement rate was included. With a response rate of 80%, 36 expert esophageal cancer surgeons, from 34 hospitals, 16 countries, and 4 continents responded to this international survey. Based on the inclusion criteria, the updated quality indicator ‘textbook outcome for esophageal cancer surgery’ should consist of: tumor-negative resection margins, ≥20 lymph nodes retrieved and examined, no intraoperative complication, no complications Clavien–Dindo ≥III, no ICU/MCU readmission, no readmission related to the surgical procedure, no anastomotic leakage, no hospital stay ≥14 days, and no in-hospital mortality. This study resulted in an international consensus-based update of a quality measure, textbook outcome for esophageal cancer surgery. This updated textbook outcome should be implemented in quality assurance programs for centers performing esophageal cancer surgery, and could standardize quality measures used internationally.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document