scholarly journals Comparison of the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block and ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block in Uniportal video-assisted Thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Wang ◽  
Shijing Wei ◽  
Shuai Li ◽  
Jie Yu ◽  
Guohua Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Paravertebral Block ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Abstract Background The optimal modality for postoperative analgesia after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (UVATS) for the treatment of lung cancer has not yet been determined. Both ultrasound-guided paravertebral block (PVB) and retrolaminar block (RLB) have been reported to be successful in providing analgesia after UVATS. However, which block technique provides superior analgesia after UVATS is still unclear. This randomized study was designed to compare the postoperative analgesic effects and adverse events associated with ultrasound-guided PVB and RLB after UVATS. Methods Sixty patients with lung cancer were randomized to undergo ultrasound-guided PVB (group P) or ultrasound-guided RLB (group R). In group P, 30 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine was injected at the T3 and T5 levels via ultrasound-guided PVB (15 mL at each level on the operative side). In group R, 30 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine was injected at the T3 and T5 levels via ultrasound-guided RLB (15 mL at each level on the operative side). The primary outcome was the numerical rating scale (NRS) score within 48 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes were total postoperative sufentanil consumption, time to first analgesic request and adverse events. Results At 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h postoperatively, the NRS score at rest in group P was lower than that in group R (p < 0.05). At 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 h postoperatively, the NRS score while coughing in group P was lower than that in group R (p < 0.05). The total postoperative sufentanil consumption in group P was significantly lower than that in group R (p < 0.001). Additionally, the time to first analgesic request was longer in group R than in group P (p < 0.0001). The incidence of nausea in group R was higher than that in group P (p < 0.05). Conclusions In patients with lung cancer undergoing UVATS, ultrasound-guided PVB with 0.5% ropivacaine provides better analgesia and results in less nausea than ultrasound-guided RLB. Compared with ultrasound-guided RLB, ultrasound-guided PVB seems to be a better technique for analgesia in UVATS. Trial registration The name of this study is the Effect And Mechanism Of Ultrasound-guided Multimodal Regional Nerve Block On Acute And Chronic Pain After Thoracic Surgery. This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100044060). The date of registration was March 9, 2021.

scholarly journals Rhomboid intercostal block combined with sub-serratus plane block versus rhomboid intercostal block for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective randomized-controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Deng ◽  
Xiao-min Hou ◽  
Xu-yan Zhou ◽  
Qing-he Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Numerical Rating ◽  
Intercostal Block ◽  
Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Abstract Background Rhomboid intercostal block (RIB) and Rhomboid intercostal block with sub-serratus plane block (RISS) are the two types of plane blocks used for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). This prospective randomized controlled trial was performed to analyze the postoperative analgesic effects of ultrasound-guided RIB block and RISS block after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Methods Ninety patients aged between 18 and 80 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Classes I–II and scheduled for elective unilateral VATS were randomly allocated into three groups. In group C, no block intervention was performed. Patients in group RIB received ultrasound-guided RIB with 20-mL 0.375% ropivacaine and those in group RISS received ultrasound-guided RIB and serratus plane block using a total of 40-mL 0.375% ropivacaine. All patients received intravenous sufentanil patient-controlled analgesia upon arrival in the recovery room. Postoperative sufentanil consumption and pain scores were compared among the groups. Results The dosages of sufentanil consumption at 24 h after the surgery in the RIB and RISS groups were significantly lower than that in group C (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001 for all comparisons, respectively), the postoperative Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores in the RIB and RISS groups at 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h after surgery when patients were at rest or active were significantly lower than that in group C (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). The required dosage of sufentanil and time to first postoperative analgesic request in groupRISS were less than those in the group RIB at 24 h after the surgery (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001 for all comparisons, respectively). Similarly, the Numerical Rating Scale scores for group RISS at 12, 18, and 24 h after the surgery when the patients were active were significantly lower than those for group RIB (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Conclusion Both ultrasound-guided RIB block and RISS block can effectively reduce the demand for sufentanil within 24 h after VATS, and less sufentanil dosage is needed in patient with RISS block. Ultrasound-guided RIB block and RISS block can effectively relieve pain within 24 h after VATS, and RISS block is more effective.

scholarly journals Thoracic Paravertebral Block with Adjuvant Dexmedetomidine in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boohwi Hong ◽  
ChaeSeong Lim ◽  
Hyemin Kang ◽  
Hongsik Eom ◽  
Yeojung Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽  
Wedge Resection ◽  
Paravertebral Block ◽  
P Value ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Thoracic Paravertebral Block ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Fentanyl Consumption ◽  
Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Background: The addition of the adjuvant dexmedetomidine to a nerve block improves the quality of the block and reduces perioperative opioid consumption. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant for the thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in postoperative pain control after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Methods: Sixty-six males, aged 15–40 years, with spontaneous pneumothorax scheduled for VATS wedge resection were enrolled. Following surgery, ultrasound-guided TPVB was performed on the T3 and T5 levels with 30 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine, plus adjuvant dexmedetomidine 50 μg or normal saline. The primary outcome was cumulative fentanyl consumption at 24 h. Pain severity, the requirement for additional rescue analgesics, hemodynamic variations, and side effects were also evaluated. Results: Median postoperative cumulative fentanyl consumption at 24 h was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group (122.6 (interquartile range (IQR) 94.5–268.0) μg vs. 348.1 (IQR, 192.8–459.2) μg, p-value = 0.001) with a Hodges–Lehman median difference between groups of 86.2 (95% confidence interval (CI), 4.2–156.4) mg. Coughing numeric rating scale (NRS) was lower in the dexmedetomidine group at postoperative 2, 4, 8, and 24 h. However, resting NRS differed significantly only after 4 h postoperative. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine as an adjunct in TPVB provided effective pain relief and significantly reduced opioid requirement in VATS.

scholarly journals Comparison of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery: a randomized controlled non-inferiority clinical trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuko Taketa ◽  
Yumi Irisawa ◽  
Taro Fujitani
Keyword(s):  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Paravertebral Block ◽  
Erector Spinae ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Thoracic Paravertebral Block ◽  
Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Erector Spinae Plane Block

Background and objectivesThe anesthetic characteristics of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) remain unclear. We compared the analgesic efficacies of ESPB and thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) for analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).MethodIn this prospective randomized non-inferiority trial, 88 patients undergoing VATS randomly received ESPB or TPVB. All patients received continuous infusion of 0.2% levobupivacaine (8 mL/hour) after injection of a 20 mL 0.2% levobupivacaine bolus. The primary outcome was median differences between the groups in postoperative numerical rating scale (NRS) scores at rest, 24 hours postoperatively.ResultsEighty-one patients completed the study. The median difference in NRS scores at rest 24 hours postoperatively was 1 (range 0–1), demonstrating the non-inferiority of ESPB to TPVB. NRS scores at rest were significantly lower in the TPVB group at 1, 2 and 24 hours postoperatively (p=0.02, 0.01 and 0.006, respectively). NRS scores on movement were similar. More dermatomes in parasternal regions were anaesthetized in the TPVB group (p<0.0001). Total plasma levobupivacaine concentrations were significantly lower in the ESPB group within 20 hours postoperatively (p=0.036).ConclusionsThe analgesic effect of ESPB after VATS was non-inferior to that of TPVB 24 hours postoperatively.Trial registration numberUMIN000030658.

932 A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Subxiphoid Versus Unilateral Intercostal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Patel ◽  
A Almukhtar ◽  
E Caruana
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Operative Duration ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Subxiphoid Approach ◽  
Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Abstract Introduction Subxiphoid approach is emerging as an alternative to intercostal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). We sought to compare the clinical efficacy of both approaches. Method A protocol was registered at PROSPERO [CRD42020155686]. Studies were retrieved from literature in July 2020. The Main outcomes were operative duration, intraoperative complications and postoperative length of hospital stay (LoS). Subgroup analysis was performed by procedure type. Results 1469 patients (51% male) were included from 12 observational studies, with 620 (42%) having undergone sVATS. There was a high-moderate risk of bias across included papers. There was no difference in operative duration (MD 13.1 minutes, 95% CI -11.3 to + 37.6; p = 0.29), intraoperative complications (OR 0.17, 95% CI -0.28 to + 0.61; p = 0.47), or LoS (MD -0.8 days, 95% CI -1.8 to + 0.2; p = 0.08). LoS was lower for sVATS thymectomy (MD -1.7 days, 95% CI -2.9 to -0.3; p = 0.01). Acute pain (10-point numerical rating scale) was lower for sVATS (MD -2.2, 95% CI -3.2 to -1.2; p &lt; 0.001). There was insufficient data to report on chronic pain, quality of life, or surgeon workload. Conclusions There is a potential benefit for sVATS in selected procedures. Well-designed randomised trials with consistent outcome reporting are required.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document