scholarly journals Low gestational age is associated with less anastomotic complications after open primary repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Dingemann ◽  
Julia Brendel ◽  
Julia Wenskus ◽  
Sabine Pirr ◽  
Nagoud Schukfeh ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 767-771
Author(s):  
Vaibhav Pandey ◽  
Pranay Panigrahi ◽  
Rakesh Kumar ◽  
Arj Deo Upadhyayay ◽  
Shiv P Sharma

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J L Yasuda ◽  
W J Svetanoff ◽  
S J Staffa ◽  
P D Ngo ◽  
S J Clark ◽  
...  

Abstract Summary Esophageal anastomotic leak (EAL) is a potentially severe complication of surgical procedures of the esophagus. Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy is increasingly used in the treatment of EAL, with observational studies suggesting it is a highly effective method for esophageal defect closure.1–3 It was hypothesized that prophylactic esophageal VAC (EVAC) placement at the time of new anastomosis creation may improve blood flow and healing, potentially leading to fewer EALs. Methods Between July 2015 and November 2018, patients who underwent surgery that resulted in a new esophageal anastomosis and were deemed to be high risk for anastomotic complications had a prophylactic EVAC placed at the time of surgery. Retrospective review of similar surgical procedures without prophylactic EVAC placement from January 2014 to November 2018 was performed for comparison. Results Thirteen pediatric patients had prophylactic EVAC placement at the time of esophageal repair. Procedures prompting EVAC placement included primary repair of long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) by the Foker technique (N = 7), stricture resection after repaired LGEA (N = 3) or type C esophageal atresia (N = 1), and stricture resection after delayed identification of a retained esophageal foreign body (N = 2). Three of 13 patients who had prophylactic EVAC placement (23.1%) experienced EAL in the post-operative period. Two patients were found to have technical failure of their EVAC leading to absence of suction, and one patient experienced delayed EAL 12 days after removal of the EVAC. In comparison, post-surgical EAL occurred in 13 of 58 patients who had the Foker procedure for LGEA and in 8 of 31 patients who had esophageal stricture resection without prophylactic EVAC placement. The rates of EAL in the prophylactic EVAC group were not significantly different from rates of EAL in either the post-surgical Foker (23.1% vs 22.4%, P = 0.999), post-stricture resection (23.1% vs 25.8%, P = 0.999), or combined post-Foker and stricture resection (23.1% vs 23.6%, P = 0.999) groups by Fisher's exact test. Conclusions Prophylactic EVAC placement does not carry increased risk of EAL compared to standard post-surgical care; however, further device refinement is needed to reduce technical failure.


2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (10) ◽  
pp. 1567-1570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Schmidt ◽  
Florian Obermayr ◽  
Justus Lieber ◽  
Christian Gille ◽  
Frank Fideler ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 45-53
Author(s):  
I.N. Khvorostov ◽  
◽  
N.K. Barova ◽  
S.V. Minaev ◽  
M.A. Akselrov ◽  
...  

The combination of duodenal atresia (DA) with esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (EA-TEF) is a rare pathology, the frequency of which ranges from 1% to 6% of all cases of EA. Surgical treatment of the DA+EA-TEF combination always causes significant difficulties, primarily in determining the timing and stages of surgical correction. Objective of the study: to evaluate the results of treatment with a combination of DA+EA-TEF to determine the effective tactics of surgical treatment. Materials and methods of research: a retrospective, nonrandomized, uncontrolled, multicenter study was carried out. The work is based on the results of treatment of 15 newborns – 6 (40%) boys, 9 (60%) girls with a combination of DA+EA-TEF, who were treated in clinics of 6 university centers for pediatric surgery in the Russian Federation in 2015–2021. Simultaneous operations (SIMOPs) were performed in 10 (60%) patients, two-stage operations (TO) – in 5 (40%) newborns. The following criteria were taken into account: the period of antenatal (weeks) and postnatal (days) of establishing the diagnosis of obstruction of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), gestational age (weeks), birth weight (g), weight at the time of surgery (g), type of concomitant pathology , sequence and methods of surgical treatment, terms of complete enteral feeding (days), outcomes of operations and reasons for unsatisfactory outcomes. The average gestational age of children who underwent SIMOPs was 35.1 weeks. (Q1 – 31.5, Q3 – 39; Me – 37; SD – 5.1; min/max – 25–40; 95% CI: 31.1–39.0) versus 29.8 weeks. at DO (Q1 – 29, Q3 – 30.5; Me – 30; SD – 1.0; min/max – 28–31; 95% CI: 28.4–31.6) did not differ statistically significantly (р=0.083). The mean body mass values did not have statistically significant differences (p=0.081) and amounted to 2224 g (Q1 – 1410, Q3 – 2930; Me – 2665; SD – 890.8; min/max – 760–3260; 95% CI: 1556–2926) for SIMOPs, versus 1322 g (Q1 – 1165, Q3 – 1450; Me – 1380; SD – 196; min/max – 980–1450; 95% CI: 1078.4–16565) in the TO group. Results: the average duration of SIMOPs was on average 144.4 min (Q1 – 125, Q3 – 155; Me – 147.5; SD – 22; min/max – 120–190; 95% CI: 1321–159.3), TO – 147.0 (Q1 – 125, Q3 – 172; Me – 140; SD – 33.4; min/max – 120–205; 95% CI: 126–178.6). The sequence of surgical correction of defects in SIMOPs in 8 (53%) patients consisted of thoracotomy, ligation of the TEF, direct anastomosis of the esophagus and the imposition of duodeno-duodenoanstomosis (DDA). In one case, DDA was selected as the first operation, which was supplemented with Kader gastrostomy followed by thoracotomy, ligation of the TEF and anastomosis of the esophagus after elongation according to I. Livaditis. In one patient, after thoracotomy and ligation of the TEF in connection with an insurmountable diastasis of the esophagus, a cervical esophagostomy (CE), duodenojejunoanastomosis (DEA) and a gastrostomy according to Kader were applied. In a two-stage correction (TO), the first operation in 3 patients was DDA (20%), supplemented in one case (7%) with Kader gastrostomy, and the second stage after 2 days performed thoracotomy with the elimination of TEF and EA. In 2 (13%) newborns, the first stage was thoracotomy, elimination of TEF and EA, followed by imposition of DDA 2 days later. In one case, due to an insurmountable diastasis of the esophagus after thoracotomy and ligation of the TEF, intrathoracic elongation of the esophagus according to Foker with delayed anastomosis of the esophagus (on the 7th day) and laparoscopic fundoplication according to Nissen (at 5 months) were performed. The duration of hospitalization did not statistically significantly depend on the chosen method for correcting the combination of DA+EA-TEF (p=0.79) and averaged 28.4 days for SIMOPs (Q1 – 16, Q3 –34.5; Me – 26; SD – 21.4; min/max – 5.0–79; 95% CI: 17.6–42.4), and for TOs – 27,2 days (Q1 – 21, Q3 – 33; Me – 28; SD – 7.1; min/max – 19–38; 95% CI: 27.2–33). In the group of patients with SIMOPs, 2 deaths (13%) were recorded on the 5th and 7th days after surgery due to progressive multiple organ failure and intractable pulmonary hypertension. In one case (7%), a lethal outcome was recorded 8 months after primary surgery due to progressive cardiovascular failure. Early postoperative mortality after SIMOPs was 20%, overall mortality was 30%. In the TO group, 3 (20%) deaths were recorded: 2 in the early postoperative period (on day 3 and day 19) and one at the age of 3 months of life. Early postoperative mortality after TO was 40%, overall mortality – 60%. Conclusion: it is preferable to choose the ligation of the TEF as the first operation and, if the child's condition allows, to impose an esophageal anastomosis and restore duodenal patency, followed by a nasogastric tube through the esophageal anastomosis into the stomach. If, after ligation of the TEF, the patient's cardiorespiratory status does not stabilize, it is possible to restore the patency of the esophagus and pass the probe into the stomach without imposing a gastrostomy, which will allow the patient to be further treated as an isolated DA, and the operation to restore the patency of the duodenum is delayed. In the presence of insurmountable diastasis, the use of esophageal elongation technology with subsequent delayed EA is justified.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document