scholarly journals Improved patient-reported outcomes after interprofessional training in mental health: a nonrandomized intervention study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Marcussen ◽  
Birgitte Nørgaard ◽  
Karen Borgnakke ◽  
Sidse Arnfred
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Intervention Study ◽  
Interprofessional Training ◽  
Patient Reported

Understanding quality of life and treatment history of patients with Bertolotti syndrome compared with lumbosacral radiculopathy

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua L. Golubovsky ◽  
Arbaz Momin ◽  
Nicolas R. Thompson ◽  
Michael P. Steinmetz
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Mental Health ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Lumbosacral Radiculopathy ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Age And Sex

OBJECTIVEBertolotti syndrome is a rare spinal condition that causes low-back pain due to a lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV), which is a pseudoarticulation between the fifth lumbar transverse process and the sacral ala. Bertolotti syndrome patients are rarely studied, particularly with regard to their quality of life. This study aimed to examine the quality of life and prior treatments in patients with Bertolotti syndrome at first presentation to the authors’ center in comparison with those with lumbosacral radiculopathy.METHODSThis study was a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with Bertolotti syndrome and lumbosacral radiculopathy due to disc herniation seen at the authors’ institution’s spine center from 2005 through 2018. Diagnoses were confirmed with provider notes and imaging. Variables collected included demographics, diagnostic history, prior treatment, patient-reported quality of life metrics, and whether or not they underwent surgery at the authors’ institution. Propensity score matching by age and sex was used to match lumbosacral radiculopathy patients to Bertolotti syndrome patients. Group comparisons were made using t-tests, Fisher’s exact test, Mann-Whitney U-tests, Cox proportional hazards models, and linear regression models where variables found to be different at the univariate level were included as covariates.RESULTSThe final cohort included 22 patients with Bertolotti syndrome who had patient-reported outcomes data available and 46 propensity score–matched patients who had confirmed radiculopathy due to disc herniation. The authors found that Bertolotti syndrome patients had significantly more prior epidural steroid injections (ESIs) and a longer time from symptom onset to their first visit. Univariate analysis showed that Bertolotti syndrome patients had significantly worse Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) mental health T-scores. Adjustment for prior ESIs and time from symptom onset revealed that Bertolotti syndrome patients also had significantly worse PROMIS physical health T-scores. Time to surgery and other quality of life metrics did not differ between groups.CONCLUSIONSPatients with Bertolotti syndrome undergo significantly longer workup and more ESIs and have worse physical and mental health scores than age- and sex-matched patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy. However, both groups of patients had mild depression and clinically meaningful reduction in their quality of life according to all instruments. This study shows that Bertolotti syndrome patients have a condition that affects them potentially more significantly than those with lumbosacral radiculopathy, and increased attention should be paid to these patients to improve their workup, diagnosis, and treatment.

scholarly journals Sex differences in outcomes after arthroscopic bankart repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000965
Author(s):  
Natalie A Lowenstein ◽  
Peter J Ostergaard ◽  
Daniel B Haber ◽  
Kirsten D Garvey ◽  
Elizabeth G Matzkin
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Sex Differences ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Strength Function ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Males And Females

ObjectivesRisk factors for anterior shoulder dislocation include young age, contact activities and male sex. The influence of sex on patient-reported outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) is unclear, with few studies reporting potential differences. This study’s purpose was to compare patient-reported outcomes of males and females following ABR.MethodsProspectively collected data was analysed for 281 patients (males: 206, females: 75) after ABR with preoperative, 1-year and 2-year follow-up responses. The Wilcoxon signed-rank and χ2 tests, preoperative, 1 year and 2 year follow-up results were examined to determine differences of scores in males versus females.ResultsNo statistically significant sex differences were observed in Simple Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) or Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) Scores at 1-year or 2-year follow-up. Females had lower Veterans RAND 12-item health survey (VR-12) mental health subscores at 2-year follow-up (females: 52.3±9.0, males: 55.8±7.6, p=0.0016). Females were more likely to report that treatment had ‘exceeded expectations’ at 2-year follow-up regarding motion, strength, function and normal sports activities.ConclusionResults of study demonstrate that ABR has similar outcomes for both males and females. There were no statistically significant sex-related differences in SST, ASES, VAS or SANE scores following ABR. VR-12 mental health subscores showed a minimal difference at 2-year follow-up, with lower scores in females.Level of evidenceRetrospective cohort study; level II.

Six-month and 12-month patient outcomes based on inflammatory subphenotypes in sepsis-associated ARDS: secondary analysis of SAILS-ALTOS trial

Thorax ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. thoraxjnl-2020-216613
Author(s):  
Mohamed D Hashem ◽  
Ramona O Hopkins ◽  
Elizabeth Colantuoni ◽  
Victor D Dinglas ◽  
Pratik Sinha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Cognitive Outcomes ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Sepsis Trial

BackgroundPrior acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) trials have identified hypoinflammatory and hyperinflammatory subphenotypes, with distinct differences in short-term outcomes. It is unknown if such differences extend beyond 90 days or are associated with physical, mental health or cognitive outcomes.Methods568 patients in the multicentre Statins for Acutely Injured Lungs from Sepsis trial of rosuvastatin versus placebo were included and assigned a subphenotype. Among 6-month and 12-month survivors (N=232 and 219, respectively, representing 243 unique survivors), subphenotype status was evaluated for association with a range of patient-reported outcomes (eg, mental health symptoms, quality of life). Patient subsets also were evaluated with performance-based tests of physical function (eg, 6 min walk test) and cognition.FindingsThe hyperinflammatory versus hypoinflammatory subphenotype had lower overall 12-month cumulative survival (58% vs 72%, p<0.01); however, there was no significant difference in survival beyond 90 days (86% vs 89%, p=0.70). Most survivors had impairment across the range of outcomes, with little difference between subphenotypes at 6-month and 12-month assessments. For instance, at 6 months, in comparing the hypoinflammatory versus hyperinflammatory subphenotypes, respectively, the median (IQR) patient-reported SF-36 mental health domain score was 47 (33–56) vs 44 (35–56) (p=0.99), and the per cent predicted 6 min walk distance was 66% (48%, 80%) vs 66% (49%, 79%) (p=0.76).InterpretationComparing the hyperinflammatory versus hypoinflammatory ARDS subphenotype, there was no significant difference in survival beyond 90 days and no consistent findings of important differences in 6-month or 12-month physical, cognitive and mental health outcomes. These findings, when considered with prior results, suggest that inflammatory subphenotypes largely reflect the acute phase of illness and its short-term impact.

scholarly journals Correlation of 2-year SRS-22r and ODI patient-reported outcomes with 5-year patient-reported outcomes after complex spinal fusion: a 5-year single-institution study of 118 patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 422-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owoicho Adogwa ◽  
Isaac O. Karikari ◽  
Aladine A. Elsamadicy ◽  
Amanda R. Sergesketter ◽  
Diego Galan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Spinal Fusion ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Research Society ◽  
Scoliosis Research Society ◽  
Self Image ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Spinal Arthrodesis

OBJECTIVEPatient-reported outcomes (PROs) are often measured up to 2 years after surgery; however, prospective collection of longitudinal outcomes for 5 years postoperatively can be challenging due to lack of patient follow-up. The aim of this study was to determine whether PROs collected at 2-year follow-up accurately predict long-term PROs 5 years after complex spinal fusion (≥ 5 levels).METHODSThis was an ambispective study of 118 adult patients (≥ 18 years old) undergoing ≥ 5-level spinal arthrodesis to the sacrum with iliac fixation from January 2002 to December 2011. Patient demographics and radiographic parameters as well as intraoperative variables were collected. PRO instruments (Scoliosis Research Society [SRS]-22r function, self-image, mental health, pain, and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]) were completed before surgery then at 2 and 5 years after surgery. Primary outcome investigated in this study was the correlation between SRS-22r domains and ODI collected at 2- and 5-year follow-up.RESULTSOf the 118 patients, 111 patients had baseline PROs, 105 patients had 2-year follow-up data, and 91 patients had 5-year follow-up PRO data with 72% undergoing revision surgery. The average pre- and postoperative major coronal curve Cobb angles for the cohort were 32.1° ± 23.7° and 19.8° ± 19.3°, respectively. There was a strong correlation between 2- and 5-year ODI (r2 = 0.80, p < 0.001) and between 2- and 5-year SRS-22r domains, including function (r2 = 0.79, p < 0.001), self-image (r2 = 0.82, p < 0.001), mental health (r2 = 0.77, p < 0.001), and pain (r2 = 0.79, p < 0.001). Of the PROs, ODI showed the greatest absolute change from baseline to 2- and 5-year follow-up (2-year Δ 17.6 ± 15.9; 5-year Δ 16.5 ± 19.9) followed by SRS-22r self-image (2-year Δ 1.4 ± 0.96; 5-year Δ 1.3 ± 1.0), pain (2-year Δ 0.94 ± 0.97; 5-year Δ 0.80 ± 1.0), function (2-year Δ 0.60 ± 0.62; 5-year Δ 0.49 ± 0.79), and mental health (2-year Δ 0.49 ± 0.77; 5-year Δ 0.38 ± 0.84).CONCLUSIONSPatient-reported outcomes collected at 2-year follow-up may accurately predict long-term PROs (5-year follow-up).

scholarly journals The Impact of Pre-Operative Mental Health and Depression on Outcomes after Total Ankle Arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0018
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Cunningham ◽  
John Steele ◽  
Samuel B. Adams
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Total Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Linear Regression Models ◽  
Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Change Scores ◽  
Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

Category: Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Poor pre-operative mental health and depression have been shown to negatively impact patient- reported outcomes (PROMs) after a broad array of orthopaedic procedures involving the spine, hip, knee, shoulder, and hand. However, the relationship of mental health and patient-reported outcomes in foot and ankle surgery is less clear. The purpose of this study is to characterize the impact of pre-operative mental health and depression on patient-reported outcomes after total ankle arthroplasty. The study hypothesis is that depression and decreased SF36 MCS will be significantly associated with diminished improvement in PROMs after total ankle arthroplasty. Methods: All patients undergoing primary TAA between January 2007 and December 2016 who were enrolled into a prospective, observational study and who had at least 1 to 2-year minimum study follow-up were included. Patients were separated into 4 groups based on the presence or absence of SF36 MCS<35 and diagnosis of depression. Pre-operative to post- operative change scores in the SF36 physical and mental component summary scores (PCS and MCS), Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) function and bother components, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain were calculated in 1 to 2-year follow-up. Multivariable, main effects linear regression models were constructed to evaluate the impact of SF36 and depression status on pre-operative to 1 to 2-year follow-up change scores with adjustment for age, sex, race, body mass index, current smoking, American Society of Anesthesiologist’s score, smoking, and Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score. Results: As in Table 1, adjusted analyses demonstrated that patients with MCS<35 and depression had significantly lower improvements in all change scores including SF36 MCS (-5.1 points) and PCS (-7.6 points), SMFA bother (6 points) and function scores (5.7 points), and VAS pain (7.5 points) compared with patients that had SF36>=35 and no depression. Patients with MCS<35 and no depression had significantly greater improvement in SF36 MCS (5.3 points) compared with patients that had MCS>=35 and no depression. Patients with MCS>=35 and depression had significantly lower improvement in SF36 MCS (-3.2 points) compared with patients that had MCS>=35 and no depression. Adjusted analyses of minimum 5-year outcomes demonstrated significantly increased improvement in MCS and SMFA function for patients with pre-operative MCS<35 and no depression. Conclusion: Presence of depression and decreased SF36 MCS are risk factors for diminished improvement in PROMs. Patients with depression and decreased MCS should be counseled about their risk of diminished improvement in outcomes compared to peers. As PROM’s become part of physician evaluations, it is becoming increasingly important to identify factors for diminished improvement outside of the physician’s control. [Table: see text]

Characteristics of Clients Seeking Yoga Therapy in a University-Based Student Clinic

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffany Moonaz ◽  
Marlysa Sullivan ◽  
Daryl Nault ◽  
Irene Bright-Dumm ◽  
Ryan Bradley
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
The United States ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Physical And Mental Health ◽  
Yoga Therapy ◽  
Highly Educated ◽  
Clinical Encounters ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Yoga therapy is an emerging profession with recent development of educational competencies, training program accreditation, and practitioner certification. In the United States, most yoga therapy training programs are studio-based and data on mentored clinical encounters are lacking. This study aimed to characterize the client population in a university-based mentored student clinic. As part of a larger feasibility study, data were collected at all clinic visits for 70 consenting clients. Data collected included demographic characteristics, reasons for pursuing care, use of other healthcare approaches, and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) for physical and mental health. Participants were mostly middle-aged, White, and highly educated. Common reasons for pursuing care were pain and mental health. Most used multiple healthcare approaches. Average scores for most patient-reported outcomes fell within normal range at baseline. Future studies are needed to better characterize yoga therapy users and to expand access for populations in whom the modality is underutilized despite emerging evidence of relevance.

scholarly journals Preoperative mental health status may not be predictive of improvements in patient-reported outcomes following an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin C. Mayo ◽  
Dustin H. Massel ◽  
Daniel D. Bohl ◽  
Ankur S. Narain ◽  
Fady Y. Hijji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Mental Health Status ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Arm Pain ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Postoperative Time

OBJECTIVE Prior studies have correlated preoperative depression and poor mental health status with inferior patient-reported outcomes following lumbar spinal procedures. However, literature regarding the effect of mental health on outcomes following cervical spinal surgery is limited. As such, the purpose of this study is to test for the association of preoperative SF-12 Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores with improvements in Neck Disability Index (NDI), SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS), and neck and arm pain following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS A prospectively maintained surgical database of patients who underwent a primary 1- or 2-level ACDF during 2014–2015 was reviewed. Patients were excluded if they did not have complete patient-reported outcome data for the preoperative or 6-week, 12-week, or 6-month postoperative visits. At baseline, preoperative SF-12 MCS score was assessed for association with preoperative NDI, neck visual analog scale (VAS) score, arm VAS score, and SF-12 PCS score. The preoperative MCS score was then tested for association with changes in NDI, neck VAS, arm VAS, and SF-12 PCS scores from the preoperative visit to postoperative visits. These tests were conducted using multivariate regression controlling for baseline characteristics as well as for the preoperative score for the patient-reported outcome being assessed. RESULTS A total of 52 patients were included in the analysis. At baseline, a higher preoperative MCS score was negatively associated with a lower preoperative NDI (coefficient: −0.74, p < 0.001) and preoperative arm VAS score (−0.06, p = 0.026), but not preoperative neck VAS score (−0.03, p = 0.325) or SF-12 PCS score (0.04, p = 0.664). Additionally, there was no association between preoperative MCS score and improvement in NDI, neck VAS, arm VAS, or SF-12 PCS score at any of the postoperative time points (6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months, p > 0.05 for each). The percentage of patients achieving a minimum clinically important difference at 6 months did not differ between the bottom and top MCS score halves (p > 0.05 for each). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that better preoperative mental health status is associated with lower perceived preoperative disability but is not associated with severity of preoperative neck or arm pain. In contrast to other studies, the present study was unable to demonstrate that preoperative mental health is predictive of improvement in patient-reported outcomes at any postoperative time point following an ACDF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document