scholarly journals Partial uncinatectomy combined with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of one-level cervical radiculopathy: analysis of clinical efficacy and sagittal alignment

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haimiti Abudouaini ◽  
Tingkui Wu ◽  
Hao Liu ◽  
Beiyu Wang ◽  
Hua Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Cervical Radiculopathy ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Uncinate Process ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Cervical Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Uncovertebral Joint

Abstract Background Biomechanical studies have demonstrated that uncovertebral joint contributes to segment mobility and stability to a certain extent. Simultaneously, osteophytes arising from the uncinate process are a common cause of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). For such patients, partial uncinatectomy (UT) may be required. However, the clinical efficacy and sagittal alignment of partial UT during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) have not been fully elucidated. Methods A total of 87 patients who had undergone single level ACDF using a zero-profile device from July 2014 to December 2018 were included. Based on whether the foraminal part of the uncovertebral joint was resected or preserved, the patients were divided into the ACDF with UT group (n = 37) and the ACDF without UT group (n = 50). Perioperative data, radiographic parameters, clinical outcomes, and complications were compared between the two groups. Results The mean follow-up was 16.86 ± 5.63 and 18.36 ± 7.51 months in the ACDF with UT group and ACDF without UT group, respectively (p > 0.05). The average preoperative VAS arm score was 5.89 ± 1.00 in the ACDF with UT group and 5.18 ± 1.21 in the ACDF without UT group (p = 0.038). However, the average VAS arm score was 4.22 ± 0.64, 4.06 ± 1.13 and 1.68 ± 0.71, 1.60 ± 0.70 at 1 week post operation and at final follow up, respectively, (p > 0.05). We also found that the C2-7 SVA and St-SVA at the last follow-up and their change (last follow-up value − preoperative value) in the ACDF with UT group were significantly higher than ACDF without UT group (p < 0.05). No marked differences in the other cervical sagittal parameters, fusion rate or complications, including dysphagia, ASD, and subsidence, were observed. Conclusions Our result indicates that ACDF using a zero-p implant with or without partial UT both provide satisfactory clinical efficacy and acceptable safety. However, additional partial UT may has a negative effect on cervical sagittal alignment.

scholarly journals Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with polyetheretherketone cages in the management of single and double level cervical spondylotic myelopathy-our experiences of 80 cases

KYAMC Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-34
Author(s):  
Md Anowarul Islam ◽  
Mohd Alamgir Hossain ◽  
Ahmed Asif Iqbal ◽  
Md Qumruzzaman Parvez ◽  
Md Ahsanuzzaman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Arm Pain ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
Medical University

Background: Anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) is challenging with respect to both patient selection and choice of surgical procedure.Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with an artificial cage made of polyetheretherketoneMaterials & Methods: From January 2012 to January 2017, 80 consecutive patients referred to the Department of spine surgery, Bangabandhu Shekh Mujib Medical University were recruited for the study. Postoperative Clinical outcome assessed with Nurick scale for myelopathy, Odom's criteria for functional outcome and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for both neck and arm pain. Radiological fusion was assessed by X-ray. Operative complications were reported.Results: 36 patients were operated for one level discectomy and fusion with PEEK cages and 44 patients for two levels. There were 48 (60%) males and 32 (40%) females. The age of the patients ranged from 30-72 years, a mean ± SD 45 ± 8.34. At the 2 years clinical follow-up, there were significant post operative improvements of Nurick scale, and VAS comparative to preoperative record. According to Odom's criteria, 72/80 patients (90%) were graded excellent-good.Conclusion: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage is an effective treatment of cervical myelopathy having higher fusion rate and lack of donor site morbidity.KYAMC Journal Vol. 9, No.-1, April 2018, Page 32-34

scholarly journals Influence of complete uncinate process removal on 2-year assessment of radiologic outcomes: subsidence and sagittal balance in patients receiving one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Hyun Noh ◽  
Jeong Yoon Park ◽  
Sung Uk Kuh ◽  
Dong Kyu Chin ◽  
Keun Su Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Cervical Radiculopathy ◽  
Uncinate Process ◽  
Foraminal Stenosis ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Arm Pain ◽  
T1 Slope ◽  
Cervical Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Post Operation

Abstract Background: Many patients who appealed cervical radiculopathy have stenosis of neural foramens because of cumulative osteophyte or uncovertebral joint hypertrophy. For cervical foraminal stenosis, complete UPR conducted concurrently with ACDF. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological consequences of complete uncinate process resection (UPR) during anterior discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus those seen with ACDF without UPR. Methods: In total, 105 patients who underwent one-level ACDF with a cage-and-plate construct between 2011 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 37 underwent ACDF with complete UPR, and 68 underwent ACDF without UPR. Radiographic parameters of disc height, C2–C7 lordosis, T1 slope, C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), center of the sellar turcica–C7 SVA (St-SVA), spinocranial angle (SCA), and fusion rate were measured on plain radiographs at pre-operation, immediately post-operation, and during the follow-up period (median follow-up duration: 37.7 ± 10.5 months). Results: Improvement in Visual analogue scale (VAS) score for arm pain was significantly better in the ACDF with complete UPR group immediately post-operation. Fusion rates, C2–C7 lordosis, T1 slope, and C2–C7 SVA after single-level ACDF were not significantly different between the two groups (p>0.05). Subsidence occurred in 23 patients (ACDF with complete UPR: 14 cases [37%] versus ACDF without UPR: 9 cases [13%]; p < 0.05). Conclusions: Cervical sagittal alignment after ACDF with complete UPR is not significantly different from that achieved with ACDF without UPR. However, subsidence occurred more frequently after ACDF with complete UPR than after ACDF without UPR, although there was no clinical impact. More precise and careful selection of patients is needed when deciding on additional complete UPR.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficiency of Biomimetic Nanohydroxyapatite/Polyamide 66 Composite in Rabbits and Primary Use in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Xu ◽  
Yan Wang ◽  
Xiaojing Su ◽  
Xuelian Zhang ◽  
Xuesong Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spondylosis ◽  
Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Hind Femur ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Peek Cage ◽  
Polyamide 66 ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Cage Subsidence ◽  
Cervical Spondylosis Myelopathy

This study was conducted to validate the safety and efficiency of biomimetic nanohydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 (n-HA/PA66) composite in animal model (rabbit) and report its application in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for 4, 12, and 24 weeks. N-HA/PA66 composite was implanted into one-side hind femur defects and the control defects were kept empty as blank controls. A combination of macroscopic and histomorphometric studies was performed up to 24 weeks postoperatively and compared with normal healing. 60 cervical spondylosis myelopathy and radiculopathy patients who were subjected to ACDF using n-HA/PA66 and PEEK cage were involved in this study with six-month minimum follow-up. Their radiographic (cage subsidence, fusion status, and segmental sagittal alignment (SSA)) and clinical (VAS and JOA scales) data before surgery and at each follow-up were recorded and compared. Nanohydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 composite is safe and effective in animal experiment and ACDF.

scholarly journals Preliminary outcomes of allograft and hydroxyapatite as substitutes for autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with self-locking standalone cages

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Changsheng Yang ◽  
Wentao Zhuo ◽  
Qingchu Li ◽  
Caiqiang Huang ◽  
Huibo Yan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Iliac Bone ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Allogeneic Bone ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Cage Subsidence ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Purpose To investigate the efficacy and safety of allograft and hydroxyapatite (HA) as substitutes for autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods In this study, 49 patients (80 segments) treated with ACDF were included and allocated into three groups [group A, autogenous iliac bone, n = 18; group B, allogeneic bone, n = 16; group C, HA, n = 15]. The clinical efficacy and fusion status were compared among each group. Complications were recorded in detail, and the Bazaz classification and Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) were used to detect dysphagia and dysphonia. Results Patients exhibited similar clinical efficacy among the groups during the final follow-up. All patients in groups A and B achieved fusion compared to only 73.3% of patients in group C. Groups A and B had similar fusion score, both of which greater than that of group C. No cage subsidence was observed in group A; however, 6.3% of patients in group B and 53.3% in group C had cage subsidence. Two patients in group A (11.1%) had persistent pain at the donor site. One patient in group B had dysphagia and dysphonia (6.3%), while one patient in group C had dysphonia (6.7%). Conclusion In ACDF, the autogenous iliac bone was the most ideal bone graft. The allogeneic bone was an acceptable substitute but risked cage subsidence and dysphagia. HA had a much lower fusion rate and a high risk of cage subsidence. Better substitutes should be further explored for ACDF.

Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domagoj Coric ◽  
Paul K. Kim ◽  
Jonathan D. Clemente ◽  
Margaret O. Boltes ◽  
Marcy Nussbaum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Radiculopathy ◽  
Reoperation Rate ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Adjacent Level ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Single Level ◽  
Bryan Disc ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Object The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term results of cervical total disc replacement (TDR) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of single-level cervical radiculopathy. Methods The results of 2 separate prospective, randomized, US FDA Investigational Device Exemption pivotal trials (Bryan Disc and Kineflex|C) from a single investigational site were combined to evaluate outcomes at long-term follow-up. The primary clinical outcome measures included the Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analog scale (VAS), and neurological examination. Patients were randomized to receive cervical TDR in 2 separate prospective, randomized studies using the Bryan Disc or Kineflex|C cervical artificial disc compared with ACDF using structural allograft and an anterior plate. Patients were evaluated preoperatively; at 6 weeks; at 3, 6, and 12 months; and then yearly for a minimum of 48 months. Plain radiographs were obtained at each study visit. Results A total of 74 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the cervical TDR (n = 41) or ACDF (n = 33) group. A total of 63 patients (86%) completed a minimum of 4 years follow-up. Average follow-up was 6 years (72 months) with a range from 48 to 108 months. In both the cervical TDR and ACDF groups, mean NDI scores improved significantly by 6 weeks after surgery and remained significantly improved throughout the minimum 48-month follow-up (p < 0.001). Similarly, the median VAS pain scores improved significantly by 6 weeks and remained significantly improved throughout the minimum 48-month follow-up (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups in mean NDI or median VAS scores. The range of motion (ROM) in the cervical TDR group remained significantly greater than the preoperative mean, whereas the ROM in the ACDF group was significantly reduced from the preoperative mean. There was significantly greater ROM in the cervical TDR group compared with the ACDF group. There were 3 reoperations (7.3%) at index or adjacent levels in the cervical TDR group; all were cervical laminoforaminotomies. There were 2 adjacent-level reoperations in the cervical TDR group (4.9%). There was 1 reoperation (3.0%) in the ACDF group at an index or adjacent level (a second ACDF at the adjacent level). There was no statistically significant difference in overall reoperation rate or adjacent-level reoperation rate between groups. Conclusions Both cervical TDR and ACDF groups showed excellent clinical outcomes that were maintained over long-term follow-up. Both groups showed low index-level and adjacent-level reoperation rates. Both cervical TDR and ACDF appear to be viable options for the treatment of single-level cervical radiculopathy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document