scholarly journals The effect of age on short-term and mid-term outcomes after thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Friederike Martin ◽  
Dino Kröll ◽  
Sebastian Knitter ◽  
Tobias Hofmann ◽  
Jonas Raakow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Pulmonary Complications ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Background The number of elderly patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer rises. Current information about outcomes in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy is limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of age on short-and mid-term outcomes after thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Methods A retrospective review of 188 patients with esophageal cancer undergoing thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy between August 2014 and July 2019 was performed. Patients were divided into patients aged > 75 years (elderly group (EG), n = 37) and patients ≤ 75 years (younger group (YG), n = 151) and matched using propensity-score matching. Baseline characteristics, length of hospital stay, mortality and major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade III) were compared. Results After matching 74 patients remained (n = 37 in each group). Postoperatively, no significant differences in major and overall complications, intra-hospital and 30-day mortality, disease-free or overall survival up to 3 years after surgery were noted. The incidence of pulmonary complications (65% vs. 38%) and pneumonia (54% vs. 30%) was significantly higher and the median hospital length of stay (12 vs. 14 days) significantly longer in the EG versus YG. Conclusion Thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomies resulted in acceptable postoperative major morbidity and mortality without compromising 3-years overall and disease-free survival in elderly compared to younger patients with esophageal cancer. However, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications was higher in patients aged over 75 years.

scholarly journals Side-to-side esophagogastric anastomosis for minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: operative technique and short-term outcomes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manrica Fabbi ◽  
Stefano De Pascale ◽  
Filippo Ascari ◽  
Wanda Luisa Petz ◽  
Uberto Fumagalli Romario
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Anastomotic Leak ◽  
Anastomotic Stricture ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Pulmonary Complications ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy

AbstractTotally minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (TMIIL) is associated to lower rate of post-operative complication, decreases length of hospital stay and improves quality of life compared to open approach. Nevertheless, adaptation of TMIIL still proceeds at slow pace, mainly due to the difficulty to perform the intra-thoracic anastomosis and heterogeneity of surgical techniques. We present our experience with TMIIL utilizing a stapled side-to-side anastomosis. We retrospectively evaluated 36 patients who underwent a planned TMIIL from January 2017 to September 2020. Esophagogastric anastomoses were performed using a 3-cm linear-stapled side-to-side technique. General features, operative techniques, pathology data and short-term outcomes were analyzed. The median operative time was 365 min (ranging from 240 to 480 min) with a median blood loss of 100 ml (50–1000 ml). The median overall length of stay was 13 (7–64) days and in-hospital mortality rate was 2.8%. Two patients (5.6%) had an anastomotic leak, without need for operative intervention and another patient developed an anastomotic stricture, resolved with a single endoscopic dilation. Chylothorax occurred in three patients; two of these required a surgical intervention. Pulmonary complications occurred in six patients (16.7%). Based on Comprehensive Complications Index (CCI), median values of complications were 27.9 (ranging from 20.9 to 100). The results of our study suggest that TMIIL with a 3-cm linear-stapled anastomosis seems to be safe and effective, with low rates of post-operative anastomotic leak and stricture.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between enucleation and regular pancreatectomy in patients with non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a retrospective multicenter and propensity score-matched study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen Yang ◽  
Hengjun Gao ◽  
Jun Lu ◽  
Zheyu Niu ◽  
Huaqiang Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Objective There are limited data from retrospective studies on whether therapeutic outcomes after regular pancreatectomy are superior to those after enucleation in patients with small, peripheral and well-differentiated non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of regular pancreatectomy and enucleation in patients with non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Methods Between January 2007 and July 2020, 227 patients with non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors who underwent either enucleation (n = 89) or regular pancreatectomy (n = 138) were included. Perioperative complications, disease-free survival, and overall survival probabilities were compared. Propensity score matching was performed to balance the baseline differences between the two groups. Results The median follow-up period was 60.76 months in the enucleation group and 43.29 months in the regular pancreatectomy group. In total, 34 paired patients were identified after propensity score matching. The average operative duration in the enucleation group was significantly shorter than that in the regular pancreatectomy group (147.94 ± 42.39 min versus 217.94 ± 74.60 min, P < 0.001), and the estimated blood loss was also significantly lesser (P < 0.001). The matched patients who underwent enucleation displayed a similar overall incidence of postoperative complications (P = 0.765), and a comparable length of hospital stay (11.12 ± 3.90 days versus 9.94 ± 2.62 days, P = 0.084) compared with those who underwent regular pancreatectomy. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in disease-free survival and overall survival after propensity score matching. Conclusion Enucleation in patients with non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors was associated with shorter operative time, lesser intraoperative bleeding, similar overall morbidity of postoperative complications, and comparable 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival when compared with regular pancreatectomy.

scholarly journals Clinical features and outcomes of combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma versus hepatocellular carcinoma versus cholangiocarcinoma after surgical resection: a propensity score matching analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Wen Lin ◽  
Tsung-Chin Wu ◽  
Hung-Yu Lin ◽  
Chao-Ming Hung ◽  
Pei-Min Hsieh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Clinicopathological Features ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Background Combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) is an infrequent type of primary liver cancer that comprises hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CC). This study investigated the clinicopathological features and prognosis among cHCC-CC, HCC, and CC groups. Methods We prospectively collected the data of 608 patients who underwent surgical resection for liver cancer between 2011 and 2018 at E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Overall, 505 patients with cHCC-CC, HCC, and CC were included, and their clinicopathological features, overall survival (OS), and recurrence were recorded. OS and recurrence rates were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results In the entire cohort, the median age was 61 years and 80% were men. Thirty-five (7.0%) had cHCC-CC, 419 (82.9%) had HCC, and 51 (10.1%) had CC. The clinicopathological features of the cHCC-CC group were more identical to those of the HCC group than the CC group. OS was significantly lower in the cHCC-CC group than in the HCC group but was not significantly higher in the cHCC-CC group than in the CC group. The median OS of cHCC-CC, HCC, and CC groups was 50.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 38.7–61.2], 62.3 months (CI: 42.1–72.9), and 36.2 months (CI: 15.4–56.5), respectively. Cumulative OS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years in cHCC-CC, HCC, and CC groups were 88.5%, 62.2%, and 44.0%; 91.2%, 76.1%, and 68.0%; and 72.0%, 48.1%, and 34.5%, respectively. After propensity score matching (PSM), OS in the cHCC-CC group was not significantly different from that in the HCC or CC group. However, OS was significantly higher in the HCC group than in the CC group before and after PSM. Furthermore, the disease-free survival was not significantly different among cHCC-CC, HCC, and CC groups before and after PSM. Conclusion The clinicopathological features of the cHCC-CC group were more identical to those of the HCC group than the CC group. The OS rate was significantly lower in the cHCC-CC group than the HCC group. However, after PSM, OS and disease-free survival in the cHCC-CC group were not significantly different from those in the HCC or CC group.

scholarly journals P22 Are Elderly Patients at Increased Perioperative Morbidity and Mortality from Oesophagectomy for Oesophageal Cancer? A Systematic Mapping Review and Meta-Analysis

BJS Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohan R Gujjuri ◽  
Muhammed Elhadi ◽  
Hamza Umar ◽  
Manjunath S Subramanya ◽  
Richard P T Evans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Population ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Pulmonary Complications ◽  
Cardiac Complications ◽  
Anastomotic Leaks ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Introduction Oesophagectomy is being increasingly performed in an ageing population that is observing a concomitant growth in the life expectancy. However, the risks are poorly quantified, and this study aims to review current evidence to further quantify the postoperative of oesophagectomy in the elderly population compared to younger patients. Methods A systematic electronic search was conducted for studies reporting oesophagectomy in the elderly population. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects modelling to compute odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Primary outcome was overall complications and secondary outcomes included anastomotic leaks, cardiac complications, pulmonary complications, overall and disease-free survival. Meta-regression was performed to identify study-, hospital- and patient-level factors confounding study findings. Results This review included 37 eligible studies involving 61,723 patients. Increasing age was significantly associated with increased rates of overall complications (OR: 1.67, CI 95%: 1.42 – 1.97), cardiac complications (OR: 1.62, CI 95%: 1.10 – 2.40), pulmonary complications (OR: 1.44, CI 95%: 1.11 – 1.87) and decreased 5-year overall survival (OR: 1.36, CI 95%: 1.11 – 1.66) and 5-year disease-free survival (OR: 1.66, CI 95%: 1.40 – 1.97). Rates of anastomotic leaks showed no difference between elderly and younger patients (OR: 1.06, CI 95%: 0.71 – 1.59). Conclusion Postoperative outcomes such as overall complications, 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival appear to significantly worse in all age cut-offs in this meta-analysis. Sarcopenia and frailty act as better predictors of postoperative outcomes than chronological age. This study confirms the preconceived suspicions of increased risks in elderly patients following oesophagectomy and will aid future pre-operative counselling and informed consent.

792 OUTCOMES AFTER TOTALLY MINIMALLY INVASIVE VERSUS HYBRID OR OPEN IVOR LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY: RESULTS FROM THE INTERNATIONAL ESODATA STUDY GROUP.

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Berend Van Der Wilk ◽  
Eliza R C Hagens ◽  
Ben M Eyck ◽  
Suzanne S Gisbertz ◽  
Richard Hillegersberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Mortality Data ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Open Esophagectomy ◽  
Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract   To compare complications following totally minimally invasive (TMIE), laparoscopically assisted (hybrid) and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. Three randomized trials have reported benefits for minimally invasive esophagectomy. Two studies compared TMIE versus open esophagectomy and another compared hybrid versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Only small retrospective studies compared TMIE with hybrid Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Methods Data were used from the International Esodata Study Group assessing patients undergoing TMIE, hybrid or open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Primary outcome was pneumonia, secondary outcomes included incidence and severity of anastomotic leakage, (major) complications, length of stay, escalation of care and 90-day mortality. Data were analyzed using multivariate multilevel models. Results In total, 4733 patients were included in this study (TMIE:1472, hybrid:1364 and open:1897). Patients undergoing TMIE had lower incidence of pneumonia compared to hybrid (10.9% vs 16.3%, Odds Ratio (OR):0.56, 95%CI: 0.40–0.80) and open esophagectomy (10.9% vs 17.4%, OR:0.60, 95%CI: 0.42–0.84) and had shorter length of stay (median 10 days (IQR 8–16)) compared to hybrid (14 (11–19), p = 0.041) and open esophagectomy (11 (9–16), p = 0.027). Patients undergoing TMIE had higher rate of anastomotic leakage compared to hybrid (15.1% vs 10.7%, OR:1.47, 95%CI: 1.01–2.13) and open esophagectomy (7.3%, OR:1.73, 95%CI: 1.26–2.38). No differences were reported between hybrid and open esophagectomy. Conclusion Compared to hybrid and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, TMIE resulted in a lower pneumonia rate, a shorter hospital length of stay but a higher anastomotic leakage rate. The impact of these individual complications on survival and long-term quality of life should be further investigated.

855 OPTIMIZATION OF SURGICAL DELAY AFTER INDUCTION CHEMORADIATION FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER: 10 YEARS RETROSPECTIVE MULTI-CENTER STUDY

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis Legault-Dupuis ◽  
Philippe Bouchard ◽  
Frederic Nicodème ◽  
Jean-Pierre Gagne ◽  
Serge Simard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Pathologic Response ◽  
Complete Pathologic Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Surgical Delay ◽  
Multi Center Study ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Center Study

Abstract   The treatment of esophageal cancer is in constant evolution. Most of the esophageal cancer receive induction chemoradiation therapy. Surgical delay has been studied but the optimal timing has not been clarified. Through the years, surgical delay has been modified by surgeons in our institutions, going from an average of 6 weeks delay to an average of 10 weeks delay. It is time to ask if this change has a real positive impact on our patient. Methods In this retrospective multi-center study, we combined data from two center in Quebec city that performs oncologic esophagectomy. The surgical delay went from 6 to 10 weeks around 2014. All surgeons changed their practice at that moment. We retrospectively analysed 5 years before and after the change of practice and created two cohorts of patients. Our primary outcome compared complete pathologic response rate. Our secondary outcomes were surgical complications, anastomotic leak, disease free survival and overall survival. Results Thirty-eight patients had surgery under 8 weeks (mean: 6 weeks) after their induction chemoradiation compared to 64 patients that had surgery after 8 weeks (mean: 10 weeks). There was no statistical significant difference between groups for the complete pathologic response (32% vs 25%, p = 0,16). Important complications were similar, with a rate of 24% vs 28% (p = 0,69). Anastomotic leaks were less frequent in the less than 8 weeks group, but no statistical significance was obtained (13% vs 27%, p = 0,14).No difference in the disease-free survival rate and overall survival rate was noted (DFS 40% vs 55% (p = 0,32), OS 38% vs 38% (p = 0,29)). Conclusion The treatment of esophageal cancer is in constant evolution, induction therapy and surgical technics involve over time. Surgical delay has no impact on complete pathologic response, complication and overall survival. There is no advantage to wait longer before surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document