scholarly journals Conservative treatment for urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a simple method

BMC Urology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun-lin Ye ◽  
Hai-tao Liang ◽  
Lei Tan ◽  
Xia Zheng ◽  
Dan Xiong ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The presence of urinary fistula after ileal conduit urinary diversion is a challenging complication, and this study investigated the role of the intra-conduit negative pressure system (NPS) in the presence of urinary fistula following ileal conduit (IC) urinary diversion as a conservative treatment. Methods Using the intra-conduit NPS, a minor drainage tube was placed within a silicon tube to suck urine from the conduit with consistent negative pressure. Patients with urinary fistula following IC from August 2012 to July 2017 were recorded, and the clinical characteristics and outcome were retrospectively analyzed. Results The intra-conduit NPS was used as a primarily conservative treatment for 13 patients who suffered from urinary fistula and presented with a large amount of abdominal/pelvic drainage without other significant morbidities. The median age was 60 years old (42–74 years), and 7patients were male. The median duration between the IC operation and the presence of urinary fistula was 15 days (2–28 days), and elevated creatinine levels were detected in the abdominal/pelvic drainage with a median level of 2114 μmol/L (636–388 μmol/L). A significant decrease in abdominal/pelvic drainage was identified in 12 patients. The median time that the NPS was used was 9 days (7–11 days). The other patient did not show any improvements after 2 days of observation and then underwent open surgery. With ureteral stenting, 2 abdominal drainage tubes and the intra-conduit NPS were placed during operation, no urine leakage was observed in the abdominal/pelvic field, and the patient was cured in 9 days. With a median follow-up of 22 months, no fistula recurrence or hydronephrosis was detected. Conclusion The intra-conduit negative pressure system is a feasible and promising way to cure urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion. Because this procedure is a mini-invasive and simple approach, it might represent an alternative in selected patients.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunlin Ye ◽  
Hai-tao Liang ◽  
Lei Tan ◽  
Xia Zheng ◽  
Dan Xiong ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The presence of urinary fistula after ileal conduit urinary diversion is a challenging complication , and this study investigated the role of the intra-conduit negative pressure system (NPS) in the presence of urinary fistula following ileal conduit (IC) urinary diversion as a conservative treatment. Methods Using the intra-conduit NPS, a minor drainage tube was placed within a silicon tube to suck urine from the conduit with consistent negative pressure. Patients with urinary fistula following IC from August 2012 to July 2017 were recorded, and the clinical characteristics and outcome were retrospectively analyzed. Results The intra-conduit NPS was used as a primarily conservative treatment for 13 patients who suffered from urinary fistula and presented with a large amount of abdominal/pelvic drainage without other significant morbidities. The median age was 60 years old (42-74 years), and 7 patients were male. The median duration between the IC operation and the presence of urinary fistula was 15 days (2-28 days), and elevated creatinine levels were detected in the abdominal/pelvic drainage with a median level of 2114 µmol/L (636-388 µmol/L). A significant decrease in abdominal/pelvic drainage was identified in 12 patients. The median time that the NPS was used was 9 days (7-11 days). The other patient did not show any improvements after 2 days of observation and then underwent open surgery. With ureteral stenting, 2 abdominal drainage tubes and the intra-conduit NPS were placed during operation, no urine leakage was observed in the abdominal/pelvic field, and the patient was cured in 9 days. With a median follow-up of 22 months, no fistula recurrence or hydronephrosis was detected. Conclusion The intra-conduit negative pressure system is a feasible and promising way to cure urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion. Because this procedure is a mini-invasive and simple approach, it might represent an alternative in selected patients.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunlin Ye ◽  
Hai-tao Liang ◽  
Lei Tan ◽  
Xia Zheng ◽  
Dan Xiong ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The presence of urinary fistula after ileal conduit urinary diversion is a challenging complication , and this study investigated the role of the intra-conduit negative pressure system (NPS) in the presence of urinary fistula following ileal conduit (IC) urinary diversion as a conservative treatment. Methods Using the intra-conduit NPS, a minor drainage tube was placed within a silicon tube to suck urine from the conduit with consistent negative pressure. Patients with urinary fistula following IC from August 2012 to July 2017 were recorded, and the clinical characteristics and outcome were retrospectively analyzed. Results The intra-conduit NPS was used as a primarily conservative treatment for 13 patients who suffered from urinary fistula and presented with a large amount of abdominal/pelvic drainage without other significant morbidities. The median age was 60 years old (42-74 years), and 7 patients were male. The median duration between the IC operation and the presence of urinary fistula was 15 days (2-28 days), and elevated creatinine levels were detected in the abdominal/pelvic drainage with a median level of 2114 µmol/L (636-388 µmol/L). A significant decrease in abdominal/pelvic drainage was identified in 12 patients. The median time that the NPS was used was 9 days (7-11 days). The other patient did not show any improvements after 2 days of observation and then underwent open surgery. With ureteral stenting, 2 abdominal drainage tubes and the intra-conduit NPS were placed during operation, no urine leakage was observed in the abdominal/pelvic field, and the patient was cured in 9 days. With a median follow-up of 22 months, no fistula recurrence or hydronephrosis was detected. Conclusion The intra-conduit negative pressure system is a feasible and promising way to cure urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion. Because this procedure is a mini-invasive and simple approach, it might represent an alternative in selected patients.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunlin Ye ◽  
Hai-tao Liang ◽  
Lei Tan ◽  
Kang-hua Xiao ◽  
Zike Qin

Abstract Background Urinary fistula after ileal conduit is challenging, and this study is to investigate the role of intra-conduit negative pressure system (NPS) in urinary fistula following ileal conduit (IC) as conservative treatment. Methods Using intra-conduit NPS, a minor drainage was set in the silicon tube to suck urine from the conduit with consistent negative pressure. Patients with urinary fistula following IC from August 2012 to July 2017 were recorded, the clinical characteristics and outcome were retrospectively analyzed. Results Intra-conduit NPS was set as a primarily conservative treatment for 13 patients, who suffered urinary fistula presenting as overdose of abdominal/pelvic drainage, without other significant morbidities. Median age was 60 years old (42-74 years), and 7 were male. The median duration between IC operation and urine fistula was 15 days (2-28 days) and the elevated creatinine was detected in abdominal/pelvic drainage with a median level of 2114µmol/L (636-3852µmol/L). Significant decrease of abdominal/pelvic drainage was identified in 12 patients. The median time of NPS is 9 days (7-11days). The other one failed after observing 2 days without any improvement and then underwent open surgery. With ureter stenting, 2 abdominal drainages and intra-conduit NPS set during operation, no urine leaked in the abdominal/pelvic field and the patient cured in 9 days. With median follow-up of 22 months, no fistula recurrence or hydronephrosis was detected. Conclusion Intra-conduit negative pressure system is a feasible and promising way to cure urinary fistula following ileal conduit. For it’s mini-invasive and simple, it might be an alteration for selected patients.


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
pp. 385-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahri Yetişir ◽  
A. Ebru Salman ◽  
Muhittin Aygar ◽  
Faik Yaylak ◽  
Mustafa Aksoy ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alda Graciele Claudio dos Santos Almeida ◽  
Camila Quartim de Moraes Bruna ◽  
Giovana Abrahão de Araújo Moriya ◽  
Alessandra Navarini ◽  
Suzethe Matiko Sasagawa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document