scholarly journals Anatomical and functional outcomes after hysterectomy and bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation for stage IV uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective case series

BMC Urology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tilemachos Kavvadias ◽  
Birgitt Schoenfisch ◽  
Sara Yvonne Brucker ◽  
Christl Reisenauer
2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
pp. 592-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sayan Basu ◽  
Ritu Nagpal ◽  
Juan Carlos Serna-Ojeda ◽  
Swapnil Bhalekar ◽  
Bhupesh Bagga ◽  
...  

PurposeTo describe the anatomical and functional outcomes of the novel LVP keratoprosthesis (Kpro), developed as an alternative to the modified osteo-odonto keratoprosthesis (MOOKP), in eyes with end-stage corneal blindness where conventional corneal surgeries are contraindicated.MethodsThis prospective case series included 58 eyes of 56 patients (12 children and 44 adults) with severe bilateral keratopathy and completely dry, dermalised ocular surfaces who underwent unilateral LVP Kpro implantation from 2012 to 2016. In this two-stage procedure, an ocular surface labial mucous membrane grafting was performed, followed for 3 months by the implantation of the device under the engrafted mucosal flap. The primary outcome measures were anatomical retention rate and improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The secondary outcome measure was rate of occurrence of complications.ResultsMean postoperative follow-up was 2.5±1.1 years. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed an anatomical retention rate of 90.8%±3.9% at 1 year, 80%±5.7% at 2 years and 76.6%±6.5% at 3–5 years. The survival rates were comparable in children and adults (91% vs 72% at 5 years, p=0.258). About 61.5% of eyes maintained 20/400 or better vision and median BCVA improved from perception of light to 20/70 at 1 year postoperatively (p<0.0001). Complications like retroprosthetic membrane formation, glaucoma, vitritis, endophthalmitis and panophthalmitis occurred in 43%, 26%, 22%, 12% and 3% of the eyes, respectively.ConclusionThe LVP Kpro is an effective procedure for the treatment of end-stage corneal blindness in completely dry eyes. The LVP Kpro can be particularly useful in situations where the MOOKP is contraindicated or difficult to perform.


2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212199474
Author(s):  
Mohammad Javed Ali ◽  
Adit Gupta ◽  
Chittabhathina Sri Lakshmi ◽  
Mohammad Hasnat Ali

Purpose: The objective of this study is to propose a simple grading to assess the health of a dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) ostium. Methods: Prospective case series of 237 Ostia evaluated following dacryocystorhinostomy were included in the study. All the ostia were assessed for 10 parameters in detail using the earlier published DCR ostium scoring (DOS scoring). Each of the 10 parameters were scored individually, and final DOS scores were obtained. The anatomical and functional outcomes of each of the surgery were noted. The most significant parameters that influenced the success were determined using the binary recursive partitioning in a conditional inference framework. Data management and statistical tests were performed using the statistical “Software R” and the library “partykit” toolkits. Results: The most significant DCR ostium parameters that influenced the outcomes were anatomical and functional fluorescein dye transit ( p < 0.001), dynamicity of internal common opening (ICO) on the blink ( p < 0.001), end-on threats to ICO from granuloma, membrane or a synechia, and cicatricial closure of the Ostia. Each of these significant factors (FICI – Fluorescein endoscopy dye test, ICO dynamicity, Cicatricial ostium closure and ICO threats) were assigned simple scoring and the final scores were graded from 0 (poor DCR ostium) to +5 (excellent DCR ostium). FICI grading can guide the physician on the health status of the DCR ostium and the possible need for intervention. Conclusion: FICI DCR ostium grading is a simple, easy to perform, and physician-friendly system. More studies with larger sample size would help in further validating the FICI grading.


2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanzhou Wang ◽  
Dan Wang ◽  
Yuyan Li ◽  
Zhiqing Liang ◽  
Huicheng Xu

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 114-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan-Xu Ma ◽  
Yun Wang ◽  
Meng-Meng Bao ◽  
Chen Zhang ◽  
Xue-Yang Li ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document