scholarly journals A qualitative study of physician perspectives on adaptation to electronic health records

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia J. Sieck ◽  
Nicole Pearl ◽  
Tiffani J. Bright ◽  
Po-Yin Yen
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Physician Perspectives ◽  
Electronic Health

scholarly journals A Qualitative Study of Physician Perspectives on Adaptation to Electronic Health Records

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia Judine Sieck ◽  
Nicole Pearl ◽  
Tiffani J. Bright ◽  
Po-Yin Yen
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Opportunity To Learn ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Physician Perspectives ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Electronic Health

Abstract Background Electronic Health Records (EHRs) have the potential to improve many aspects of care and their use has increased in the last decade. Because of this, acceptance and adoption of EHRs is less of a concern than adaptation to use. To understand this issue more deeply, we conducted a qualitative study of physician perspectives on EHR use to identify factors that facilitate adaptation.Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with 9 physicians across a range of inpatient disciplines at a large Academic Medical Center. Interviews were conducted by phone, lasting approximately 30 minutes, and were transcribed verbatim for analysis. We utilized inductive and deductive methods in our analysis.Results We identified 4 major themes related to EHR adapation: impact of EHR changes on physicians, how physicians managed these changes, factors that facilitated adapation to using the EHR and adapting to using the EHR in the patient encounter. Within these themes, physicians felt that a positive mindset toward change, providing upgrade training that was tailored to their role, and the opportunity to learn from colleagues were important facilitators of adaption.Conclusions As EHR use moves beyond implementation, physicians continue to be required to adapt to the technology and to its frequent changes. Our study provides actionable findings that allow healthcare systems to focus on factors that facilitate the adaptation process for physicians.

scholarly journals A Qualitative Study of Physician Perspectives on Adaptation to Electronic Health Records

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia Judine Sieck ◽  
Nicole Pearl ◽  
Tiffani J. Bright ◽  
Po-Yin Yen
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Opportunity To Learn ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Physician Perspectives ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Electronic Health

Abstract Background Electronic Health Records (EHRs) have the potential to improve many aspects of care and their use has increased in the last decade. Because of this, acceptance and adoption of EHRs is less of a concern than adaptation to use. To understand this issue more deeply, we conducted a qualitative study of physician perspectives on EHR use to identify factors that facilitate adaptation.Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with 9 physicians across a range of inpatient disciplines at a large Academic Medical Center. Interviews were conducted by phone, lasting approximately 30 minutes, and were transcribed verbatim for analysis. We utilized inductive and deductive methods in our analysis.Results We identified 4 major themes related to EHR adapation: impact of EHR changes on physicians, how physicians managed these changes, factors that facilitated adapation to using the EHR and adapting to using the EHR in the patient encounter. Within these themes, physicians felt that a positive mindset toward change, providing upgrade training that was tailored to their role, and the opportunity to learn from colleagues were important facilitators of adaption.Conclusions As EHR use moves beyond implementation, physicians continue to be required to adapt to the technology and to its frequent changes. Our study provides actionable findings that allow healthcare systems to focus on factors that facilitate the adaptation process for physicians.

scholarly journals A Qualitative Study of Physician Perspectives on Adaptation to Electronic Health Records

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia Judine Sieck ◽  
Nicole Pearl ◽  
Tiffani J. Bright ◽  
Po-Yin Yen
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Opportunity To Learn ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Physician Perspectives ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Electronic Health

Abstract Background Electronic Health Records (EHRs) have the potential to improve many aspects of care and their use has increased in the last decade. Because of this, acceptance and adoption of EHRs is less of a concern than adaptation to use. To understand this issue more deeply, we conducted a qualitative study of physician perspectives on EHR use to identify factors that facilitate adaptation.Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with 9 physicians across a range of inpatient disciplines at a large Academic Medical Center. Interviews were conducted by phone, lasting approximately 30 minutes, and were transcribed verbatim for analysis. We utilized inductive and deductive methods in our analysis.Results We identified 4 major themes related to EHR adapation: impact of EHR changes on physicians, how physicians managed these changes, factors that facilitated adapation to using the EHR and adapting to using the EHR in the patient encounter. Within these themes, physicians felt that a positive mindset toward change, providing upgrade training that was tailored to their role, and the opportunity to learn from colleagues were important facilitators of adaption.Conclusions As EHR use moves beyond implementation, physicians continue to be required to adapt to the technology and to its frequent changes. Our study provides actionable findings that allow healthcare systems to focus on factors that facilitate the adaptation process for physicians.

scholarly journals Understanding optimisation processes of electronic health records (EHRs) in select leading hospitals: a qualitative study

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Chun Moon ◽  
Rebecca Hills ◽  
George Demiris
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
The United States ◽  
Theory Approach ◽  
Health Records ◽  
High Performing ◽  
Advisory Groups ◽  
Electronic Health

BackgroundLittle is known about optimisation of electronic health records (EHRs) systems in the hospital setting while adoption of EHR systems continues in the United States.ObjectiveTo understand optimisation processes of EHR systems undertaken in leading healthcare organisations in the United States.MethodsInformed by a grounded theory approach, a qualitative study was undertaken that involved 11 in-depth interviews and a focus group with the EHR experts from the high performing healthcare organisations across the United States.ResultsThe study describes EHR optimisation processes characterised by prioritising exponentially increasing requests with predominant focus on improving efficiency of EHR, building optimisation teams or advisory groups and standardisation. The study discusses 16 types of optimisation that interdependently produced 16 results along with identifying 11 barriers and 20 facilitators to optimisation.ConclusionsThe study describes overall experiences of optimising EHRs in select high performing healthcare organisations in the US. The findings highlight the importance of optimising the EHR after, and even before, go-live and dedicating resources exclusively for optimisation.

scholarly journals Barriers and facilitators to data quality of electronic health records used for clinical research in China: a qualitative study

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. e029314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaiwen Ni ◽  
Hongling Chu ◽  
Lin Zeng ◽  
Nan Li ◽  
Yiming Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Clinical Research ◽  
Data Quality ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Improve Data Quality ◽  
Electronic Health

ObjectivesThere is an increasing trend in the use of electronic health records (EHRs) for clinical research. However, more knowledge is needed on how to assure and improve data quality. This study aimed to explore healthcare professionals’ experiences and perceptions of barriers and facilitators of data quality of EHR-based studies in the Chinese context.SettingFour tertiary hospitals in Beijing, China.ParticipantsNineteen healthcare professionals with experience in using EHR data for clinical research participated in the study.MethodsA qualitative study based on face-to-face semistructured interviews was conducted from March to July 2018. The interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis was performed using the inductive thematic analysis approach.ResultsThe main themes included factors related to healthcare systems, clinical documentation, EHR systems and researchers. The perceived barriers to data quality included heavy workload, staff rotations, lack of detailed information for specific research, variations in terminology, limited retrieval capabilities, large amounts of unstructured data, challenges with patient identification and matching, problems with data extraction and unfamiliar with data quality assessment. To improve data quality, suggestions from participants included: better staff training, providing monetary incentives, performing daily data verification, improving software functionality and coding structures as well as enhancing multidisciplinary cooperation.ConclusionsThese results provide a basis to begin to address current barriers and ultimately to improve validity and generalisability of research findings in China.

scholarly journals Approaches to Recording Drug Allergies in Electronic Health Records: Qualitative Study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e93047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard Fernando ◽  
Zoe Morrison ◽  
Dipak Kalra ◽  
Kathrin Cresswell ◽  
Aziz Sheikh
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Electronic Health

scholarly journals Home Healthcare Clinicians’ Perspectives on Electronic Health Records: A Qualitative Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mollie Hobensack ◽  
Marietta Ojo ◽  
Kathryn Bowles ◽  
Margaret McDonald ◽  
Jiyoun Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Home Healthcare ◽  
Patient Risk ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Risk Detection ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
Northeastern Usa

Clinicians’ perspectives on the electronic health records (EHR) in home healthcare (HHC) are understudied. To explore this topic, qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 HHC clinicians in the Northeastern USA. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify key themes emerging from the interviews. While some EHR benefits were recognized, overall satisfaction with the EHR was low. The results suggest EHR limitations are tied to poor usability, restrictions, and redundancy in documentation leading to increased documentation workload. Clinicians have recommendations to mitigate these limitations via additional EHR functions and better patient risk detection. Future stakeholders should consider the results of this study when developing and updating the EHR in HHC.

scholarly journals User Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Electronic Health Records in Behavioral Hospitals: Qualitative Study

10.2196/18764 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. e18764
Author(s):  
Se Young Jung ◽  
Hee Hwang ◽  
Keehyuck Lee ◽  
Donghyun Lee ◽  
Sooyoung Yoo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Mental Health Care ◽  
Mental Health Professionals ◽  
The United States ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Electronic Health

Background Despite the rapid adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) resulting from the reimbursement program of the US government, EHR adoption in behavioral hospitals is still slow, and there remains a lack of evidence regarding barriers and facilitators to the implementation of mental health care EHRs. Objective The aim of this study is to analyze the experience of mental health professionals to explore the perceived barriers, facilitators, and critical ideas influencing the implementation and usability of a mental health care EHR. Methods In this phenomenological qualitative study, we interviewed physicians, nurses, pharmacists, mental health clinicians, and administrative professionals separately at 4 behavioral hospitals in the United States. We conducted semistructured interviews (N=43) from behavioral hospitals involved in the adoption of the mental health care EHR. Purposeful sampling was used to maximize the diversity. Transcripts were coded and analyzed for emergent domains. An exploratory data analysis was conducted. Results Content analyses revealed 7 barriers and 4 facilitators. The most important barriers to implementing the mental health care EHR were the low levels of computer proficiency among nurses, complexity of the system, alert fatigue, and resistance because of legacy systems. This led to poor usability, low acceptability, and distrust toward the system. The major facilitators to implementing the mental health care EHR were well-executed training programs, improved productivity, better quality of care, and the good usability of the mental health care EHR. Conclusions Health care professionals expected to enhance their work productivity and interprofessional collaboration by introducing the mental health care EHR. Routine education for end users is an essential starting point for the successful implementation of mental health care EHR electronic decision support. When adopting the mental health care EHR, managers need to focus on common practices in behavioral hospitals, such as documenting structured data in their organizations and adopting a seamless workflow of mental health care into the system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document