scholarly journals Emergency department-based medication review on outpatient health services utilization: interrupted time series

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie A. Kitchen ◽  
Kimberlyn McGrail ◽  
Maeve E. Wickham ◽  
Michael R. Law ◽  
Corinne M. Hohl
PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. e0170495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corinne M. Hohl ◽  
Nilu Partovi ◽  
Isabella Ghement ◽  
Maeve E. Wickham ◽  
Kimberlyn McGrail ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (s1) ◽  
pp. 133-133
Author(s):  
Ayae Yamamoto ◽  
Lillian Gelberg ◽  
Yusuke Tsugawa ◽  
Gerald Kominski ◽  
Jack Needleman

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Using multi-state discharge data, to identify predictors of frequent emergency department (ED) use among the homeless patients seen in emergent care, and to compare frequent versus less frequent homeless ED users for their risk of serious health services utilization outcomes. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Based on the State Emergency Department Database and the State Inpatient Database, homeless individuals (n = 88,541) who made at least one ED visit in four states (Florida, Maryland, Massachusetts, and New York) in 2014. In this retrospective cross-sectional analysis, patient-level demographic and clinical factors were assessed as predictors for increased ED use. Risks of opioid overdose, opioid-related hospital admission/ED visit, in-hospital mortality, mechanical ventilation, and number of hospitalizations were compared between individuals with 4 or more vs. 2-3 vs. 1 ED visit(s), adjusting for potential confounders including hospital fixed effects (allowing for within hospital comparisons). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Higher rates of ED use were associated with Medicare coverage <65; primary diagnosis of alcohol abuse, asthma, or abdominal pain; and co-morbidity of alcohol abuse, psychoses, or chronic pulmonary disease. Individuals with ≥4 visits had significantly higher adjusted risk of opioid overdose (3.7% vs. 1.2% vs. 1.0%), opioid-related hospitalizations/ED visits (17.9% vs. 8.5% vs. 6.6%), mechanical ventilation (9.8% vs. 7.0% vs. 4.7%), and greater # of hospitalizations (3.2 vs. 1.3 vs. 0.8) compared to individuals with 2-3 or 1 ED visit. Individuals with ≥4 and 2-3 ED visits had similar but increased risks of in-hospital mortality compared to individuals with 1 ED visit (2.8% vs. 2.8% vs. 2.3%). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Homeless patients who were high ED users were more likely to be hospitalized and have other adverse outcomes. These findings encourage targeted interventions (i.e. housing) for the high-utilizer homeless population to reduce the burden of serious outcomes and costs for the patient and society.


Medical Care ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl) ◽  
pp. III-31-III-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard M. Rutstein ◽  
Kelly A. Gebo ◽  
George K. Siberry ◽  
Patricia M. Flynn ◽  
Stephen A. Spector ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 100122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Xiao ◽  
Xiaochen Dai ◽  
Bradley H. Wagenaar ◽  
Fang Liu ◽  
Orvalho Augusto ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
M F Dell'Aringa ◽  
G E Corrêa-Oliveira ◽  
F Della Corte ◽  
L Ragazzoni ◽  
E S Miranda ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The global burden of mental health conditions is increasing, especially in middle- and low-income countries and frequently the quality of mental health services is lower than the quality of services for other conditions. Disasters may increase this burden through their direct impact or due to secondary stressors, such as the preclusion of access to essential services. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of Mariana dam burst (Brazil) in November 2015, in the utilization of public mental health services by the population that experienced an interruption of water supply after the event. Methods We used data from DATASUS, the database of the Brazilian public health system, analyzing data from 34 months before to 36 months after the event. We defined as affected the population living in the municipalities of Minas Gerais state that had an interruption of water supply after the event and the rest of the state population as the comparison group. We designed an Interrupted time-series analysis to evaluate both immediate and gradual changes in use of mental health services after the accident. Results The affected population included 381,749 inhabitants and the comparison group 20,487,352 inhabitants. The monthly rate of mental health visits in the affected population in the beginning of the series was 296 (CI 182 to 409, p &lt; 0.001) per 100.000 person-month. Comparing the groups after the event, we observed a non-statistically significant higher increase in the rate of visits immediately after the event of 115.96 (CI -30.00 to 261.92, p = 0.118) and a significant increase in the monthly rate of visits (change in slope) of 15.55 (CI 8.19 to 22.92, p &lt; 0.001) in the affected group. Discussion The results suggest that the event translated in a long-term increase in mental health services utilization. We believe that this study presents an innovative methodology on the assessment of mental health services after disasters and that it could be adapted to other contexts. Key messages Indirect impacts of disasters may be associated with long-term changes in the utilization of mental health services. Interrupted time series using routine data are useful tools for the assessment of health services utilization following disasters.


Author(s):  
Chanel Kwok ◽  
Katherine Lajkosz ◽  
Carole Madeley ◽  
Mona Jabbour ◽  
Teresa To ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document