scholarly journals Quality of care for adult in-patients with malaria in a tertiary hospital in Uganda

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Kiguba ◽  
Charles Karamagi ◽  
Sheila M. Bird

Abstract Background Prompt detection and appropriate treatment of malaria prevents severe disease and death. The quality of care for adult malaria in-patients is not well documented in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in Uganda. The study sought to describe the patterns of malaria diagnosis and treatment among adult in-patients admitted to the medical and gynaecological wards of Uganda’s 1790-bed Mulago National Referral Hospital from December 2013 to April 2014. Methods A prospective cohort of 762 consented in-patients aged ≥ 18 years was assembled. Proportions of in-patients who received preadmission and in-hospital anti-malarials, missed Day 1 dosing of hospital-initiated anti-malarials and/or had malaria microscopy done were determined. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk-factors for missed Day 1 dosing of anti-malarials. Results One in five (19%, 146/762) in-patients had an admission or discharge malaria diagnosis or both; with median age of 29 years (IQR, 22–42 years). Microscopy was requested in 77% (108/141) of in-patients with an admission malaria diagnosis; results were available for 46% (50/108), of whom 42% (21/50) tested positive for Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasitaemia. Only 13% (11/83) of in-patients who received in-hospital injectable artesunate (AS) or quinine (Q) received follow-up oral artemether-lumefantrine (AL); 2 of 18 severe malaria cases received follow-up oral AL. Injectable AS only (47%, 47/100) was the most frequent hospital-initiated anti-malarial treatment followed by injectable Q only (23%, 23/100) amongst in-patients who received in-hospital anti-malarials. A quarter (25%, 25/100; 95% CI: 17–35%) of in-patients missed Day 1 dosing of hospital-initiated anti-malarials. Each additional admission diagnosis was more than two-fold likely to increase the odds of missed Day 1 dosing of in-hospital anti-malarials (aOR = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.52–4.56; P-value = 0.001). Conclusions Half the malaria microscopy results were not available; yet, the rate of testing was high. The majority of in-patients initiated on injectable AS or Q did not receive the recommended follow-up oral AL. One in four in-patients delayed to initiate hospital anti-malarials by at least one calendar day. The hospital should encourage prompt availability of malaria test-results to promote the timely initiation and completion of anti-malarial treatment, thereby improving the quality of care for hospitalized malaria patients in Uganda.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Kiguba ◽  
Charles Karamagi ◽  
Sheila M. Bird

Abstract Background: Prompt detection and appropriate treatment of malaria prevents severe disease and death. The quality of care for adult malaria inpatients is not well documented in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in Uganda. We sought to describe the patterns of malaria diagnosis and treatment among adult inpatients admitted to the medical and gynaecological wards of Uganda’s 1790-bed Mulago National Referral Hospital from December 2013 to April 2014.Methods: A prospective cohort of 762 consented inpatients aged >18 years was assembled. Proportions of inpatients who received preadmission and in-hospital antimalarials, missed Day 1 dosing of hospital-initiated antimalarials and/or had malaria microscopy done were determined. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk-factors for missed Day 1 dosing of antimalarials.Results: One in five (19%, 146/762) inpatients had an admitting or discharge malaria diagnosis or both; with median age of 29 years (IQR, 22 to 42 years). Microscopy was requested in 77% (108/141) of inpatients with an admitting malaria diagnosis; results were available for 46% (50/108), of whom 42% (21/50) tested positive for malaria parasitaemia. Only 13% (11/83) of inpatients who received in-hospital injectable artesunate (AS) or quinine (Q) received follow-up oral artemether-lumefantrine (AL); only 2 of 18 severe malaria cases received follow-up oral AL. Injectable AS only (47%, 47/100) was the most frequent hospital-initiated antimalarial followed by injectable Q only (23%, 23/100). A quarter (25%, 25/100; 95% CI: 17% to 35%) of inpatients missed Day 1 dosing of hospital-initiated antimalarials. Each additional admitting diagnosis was more than two-fold likely to increase the odds of missed Day 1 dosing of in-hospital antimalarials (aOR = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.52-4.56; P-value = 0.001).Conclusions: Half the malaria microscopy results were not available; yet, the rate of testing was high. The majority of inpatients initiated on injectable AS or Q did not receive the recommended follow-up treatment of oral AL. One in four inpatients delayed to initiate hospital antimalarials by at least one calendar day. The hospital should encourage prompt availability of malaria test-results to promote the timely initiation and completion of antimalarial treatment, thereby improving the quality of care for hospitalized malaria patients in Uganda.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Ansu-Mensah ◽  
Frederick Inkum Danquah ◽  
Vitalis Bawontuo ◽  
Peter Ansu-Mensah ◽  
Tahiru Mohammed ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Free maternal healthcare financing schemes play an essential role in the quality of services rendered to clients during antenatal care in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). However, healthcare managers’ and providers’ perceptions of the healthcare financing scheme may influence the quality of care. This scoping review mapped evidence on managers’ and providers’ perspectives of free maternal healthcare and the quality of care in SSA. Methods We used Askey and O’Malley’s framework as a guide to conduct this review. To address the research question, we searched PubMed, CINAHL through EBSCOhost, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Google Scholar with no date limitation to May 2019 using keywords, Boolean terms, and Medical Subject Heading terms to retrieve relevant articles. Both abstract and full articles screening were conducted independently by two reviewers using the inclusion and exclusion criteria as a guide. All significant data were extracted, organized into themes, and a summary of the findings reported narratively. Results In all, 15 out of 390 articles met the inclusion criteria. These 15 studies were conducted in nine countries. That is, Ghana (4), Kenya (3), and Nigeria (2), Burkina Faso (1), Burundi (1), Niger (1), Sierra Leone (1), Tanzania (1), and Uganda (1). Of the 15 included studies, 14 reported poor quality of maternal healthcare from managers’ and providers’ perspectives. Factors contributing to the perception of poor maternal healthcare included: late reimbursement of funds, heavy workload of providers, lack of essential drugs and stock-out of medical supplies, lack of policy definition, out-of-pocket payment, and inequitable distribution of staff. Conclusion This study established evidence of existing literature on the quality of care based on healthcare providers’ and managers’ perspectives though very limited. This study indicates healthcare providers and managers perceive the quality of maternal healthcare under the free financing policy as poor. Nonetheless, the free maternal care policy is very much needed towards achieving universal health, and all efforts to sustain and improve the quality of care under it must be encouraged. Therefore, more research is needed to better understand the impact of their perceived poor quality of care on maternal health outcomes.


Seizure ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 291-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Mills ◽  
Max O. Bachmann ◽  
Rona Campbell ◽  
Iain Hine ◽  
Mervyn McGowan

2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 997-1006 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.H.A. Bloemen-Vrencken ◽  
L.P. de Witte ◽  
M.W.M. Post ◽  
C. Pons ◽  
F.W.A. van Asbeck ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 222-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabrina E. Wong ◽  
Michelle L. Butt ◽  
Amanda Symington ◽  
Janet Pinelli

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document