scholarly journals Pre- and postoperative left atrial and ventricular volumetric and deformation analyses in severe aortic regurgitation

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Jenner ◽  
Ali Ilami ◽  
Johan Petrini ◽  
Per Eriksson ◽  
Anders Franco-Cereceda ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The impact of volume overload due to aortic regurgitation (AR) on systolic and diastolic left ventricular (LV) indices and left atrial remodeling is unclear. We assessed the structural and functional effects of severe AR on LV and left atrium before and after aortic valve replacement. Methods Patients with severe AR scheduled for aortic valve replacement (n = 65) underwent two- and three-dimensional echocardiography, including left atrial strain imaging, before and 1 year after surgery. A control group was selected, and comprised patients undergoing surgery for thoracic aortic aneurysm without aortic valve replacement (n = 20). Logistic regression analysis was used to assess predictors of impaired left ventricular functional and structural recovery, defined as a composite variable of diastolic dysfunction grade ≥ 2, EF < 50%, or left ventricular end-diastolic volume index above the gender-specific normal range. Results Diastolic dysfunction was present in 32% of patients with AR at baseline. Diastolic LV function indices and left atrial strain improved, and both left atrial and LV volumes decreased in the AR group following aortic valve replacement. Preoperative left atrial strain during the conduit phase added to left ventricular end-systolic volume index for the prediction of impaired LV functional and structural recovery after aortic valve replacement (model p < 0.001, accuracy 70%; addition of left atrial strain during the conduit phase to end-systolic volume index p = 0.006). Conclusions One-third of patients with severe AR had signs of diastolic dysfunction. Aortic valve surgery reduced LV and left atrial volumes and improved diastolic indices. Left atrial strain during the conduit phase added to the well-established left ventricular end-diastolic dimension for the prediction of impaired left ventricular functional and structural recovery at follow-up. However, long-term follow-up studies with hard endpoints are needed to assess the value of left atrial strain as predictor of myocardial recovery in aortic regurgitation.

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Hozumi ◽  
J Morimoto ◽  
T Nishi ◽  
K Takemoto ◽  
S Fujita ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Recently, we have reported that large left atrial volume (minimum left atrial volume index : LAVImin ≥30ml/m²) at end-diastole determined by direct exposure of left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic pressure can predict post-operative symptomatic status after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in aortic stenosis (AS) patients with high sensitivity and modest specificity. Reverse remodeling of large LAVImin after AVR may contribute to false positive for the prediction of post-operative symptomatic status in patients with AS. Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate relationship between post-operative symptomatic status and reverse remodeling of large LAVImin in patients with AS who underwent AVR. Methods The study population consisted of 75 patients with AS who underwent AVR and were followed up for 600 days after AVR, after the exclusion of the followings; atrial fibrillation, significant coronary artery disease, significant mitral valve disease, pacemaker rhythm, and inadequate echocardiographic images. We measured LAVImin by biplane Simpson"s method before and after AVR. Preoperative large LAVImin (≥30ml/m²) according to the previous study was observed in 32 (43%) of 75 patients. We divided these 32 patients into two groups according to the post-operative symptomatic status during the follow-up period. Results There was no significant difference in pre-operative LAVImin between patients with and without post-operative symptom (46.5 ± 13.4 vs 40.4 ± 8.6 ml/m²). On the other hand, post-operative LAVImin in patients without post-operative symptom was significantly smaller than that in patients with post-operative symptom (31.5 ± 8.6 vs 54.8 ± 14.0 ml/m², p &lt; 0.01). While significant regression in LAVImin after AVR was observed in patients without post-operative symptom (40.4 ± 8.6 to 31.5 ± 8.6 ml/m², p &lt; 0.05), no regression in LAVImin after AVR was observed in patients with post-operative symptom (46.5 ± 13.4 to 54.8 ± 14.0 ml/m²). Conclusions Reverse remodeling of large LAVmin in patients with AS who underwent AVR was observed in post-operative asymptomatic group, but not in symptomatic group. These results suggest that reverse remodeling of large LAVImin after AVR could contribute to the post-operative asymptomatic status in patients with AS who underwent AVR.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A D Mateescu ◽  
A Calin ◽  
M Rosca ◽  
C C Beladan ◽  
R Enache ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Left atrial (LA) volume is an important cardiovascular prognostic marker. However, data regarding the prognostic value of LA volume in severe AS patients (pts) after surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) are scarce. Moreover, the predictive role of LA function in AS pts after AVR has not yet been studied. Our study aimed to assess the relationship of LA volume index (LAVi) and function with outcome, in terms of mortality, in severe AS pts who underwent surgical AVR. Methods A total of 360 consecutive pts with isolated severe AS (aortic valve area index ≤ 0.6 cm2/m2) referred to our echocardiography laboratory were prospectively screened. Two hundred and seventeen pts with preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (≥50%) and in sinus rhythm were enrolled. All patients underwent a baseline comprehensive echocardiogram, including speckle tracking analysis of both LV and LA strain. Symptomatic pts (142 pts, 65%) that were subject to AVR were followed for a median period of 4 years (IQR 3-6 years). The endpoint was all-cause mortality after AVR. The last update of the survival status was obtained in January 2019. Outcome data were available in 116 severe AS pts that underwent AVR (mean age 63 ± 10 yrs, 56% men), who formed the final study population. Results Seventeen (14%) pts died during follow-up. No significant differences were found between nonsurvivors and survivors after AVR in terms of age and cardiovascular risk factors. Nonsurvivors had higher BNP plasma values (p=.04) at baseline compared with surviving pts. Survivors and nonsurvivors alike exhibited similar preoperative AS severity and LV systolic function parameters (ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain). Moreover, there were no significant differences between the two groups regarding baseline valvuloarterial impedance, average E/e’ ratio, and LA longitudinal deformation parameters. Nonsurvivors had a tendency toward higher LV mass index (p=.08). Nonsurvivors had higher preoperative LA volume index (LAVi)(50 ± 12 vs. 44 ± 10 ml/m2, p=.003). In a multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, LAVi emerged as the only independent predictor for death in our population study (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.11, p=.02). A cut-off value for LAVi derived from ROC curve analysis was used to construct Kaplan-Meier survival curves. A value of 43 ml/m2 for LAVi predicted all-cause mortality after AVR in severe AS pts with 71% sensitivity and 54% specificity. Conclusions In our study, preoperative LAVi predicted death in severe AS pts after surgical AVR. LAVi assessment may improve preoperative risk stratification in patients with severe AS, however further larger prospective studies are needed. Abstract P301 Figure.


2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 1772
Author(s):  
Richard Ro ◽  
Stamatios Lerakis ◽  
Karthik Seetharam ◽  
Prathyusha Bande ◽  
Parasuram Krishnamoorthy ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Potter ◽  
S Ramkumar ◽  
H Yang ◽  
H Kawakami ◽  
K Negishi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Left atrial strain in the reservoir phase (LASr) measures passive LA stretch and is a sensitive marker of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (DD). However, reduced LASr has not been prospectively validated against clinical heart failure (HF) endpoints and its place in diastology evaluation is unclear. Aim We sought whether DD grades defined by previously validated ranges of LASr predicted incident HF and whether reclassifying indeterminate diastolic function based on reduced LASr could facilitate assessment of HF risk. Methods Community dwelling elderly subjects were recruited and underwent baseline clinical and echocardiographic assessment. Where imaging was suitable, speckle-tracking echocardiography assessed LASr and subjects were assigned DD grades based on published ranges: normal >35%, grade 1 24–35%, grade 2 19–24%, grade 3 <19%. Current ASE/EACVI recommendations were used to identify those with indeterminate function; LASr-defined DD (LASr-DD) was defined as LASr ≤23%. Follow-up was ≤2 years and incident HF adjudicated by Framingham criteria. Results Of 610 subjects (age 71±5 yrs., 46% male) LASr analysis was feasible in 590 (97%); average LASr was 39% (IQR 34–43%). Incident HF was associated with LASr-DD grade, occurring in 8 (36%) with grade ≥2, 14 (10%) with grade 1 and 39 (9%) with normal function (p<0.001). Adjusted odds ratio for incident HF for LASr-DD grade ≥2 was 3.12 (95% CI 1.06–9.1, p=0.038) Diastolic function was indeterminate in 147 (24%) subjects; of 144 (98%) with LAS analysis, 6 (75%) of those with LASr-DD vs. 15 (11%) with normal LASr experienced incident HF (p<0.001). Univariable Multivariable* OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value LASr-DD grade:   1 1.13 (0.59–2.15) 0.7 0.84 (0.42–1.69) 0.63   ≥2 5.7 (2.26–14.5) <0.001 3.12 (1.06–9.1) 0.038 *Adjusted for age, hypertension, diabetes, BMI, global longitudinal strain, E/e', LA volume index, LV mass index (all p<0.1 on univariable analysis). Incorporating LA strain in practice Conclusion DD defined by LASr is predictive of HF for grades ≥2 independent of other diastolic measures. Indeterminate diastolic function with LASr ≤23% is associated with incident HF. LASr may complement current diastolic function assessment recommendations. Acknowledgement/Funding Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document