scholarly journals Adoption of innovative and evidence-based practices for children and adolescents in state-supported mental health clinics: a qualitative study

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence A. Palinkas ◽  
Mee Young Um ◽  
Chung Hyeon Jeong ◽  
Ka Ho Brian Chor ◽  
Serene Olin ◽  
...  
2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadina Peters ◽  
Randi Hovden Borge ◽  
Ane- Marthe Solheim Skar ◽  
Karina M. Egeland

AbstractBackgroundEmployees’ perceptions of organizational climate for implementation of new methods are important in assessing and planning for implementation efforts. More specifically, feedback from employees’ points to which implementation strategies to select, adopt, and tailor in building positive climate for implementation of new evidence-based practices within the organization. Implementation climate can be measured with the Implementation Climate Scale (ICS). The purpose of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the ICS in outpatient mental health clinics.MethodsThe ICS was administered to 383 clinicians within 47 different child and adult mental health clinics across the country. We conducted confirmatory factor analysis to assess the psychometric functioning of the ICS. Cronbach’s alpha was examined to assess internal consistency. We also examined criterion related validity of the scale by comparing it with an alternative measure of implementation climate (concurrent validity) and by examining correlations with clinicians’ intentions to use evidence-based practices.ResultsResults supported the 6-factor structure and the internal consistency reliability of the ICS. One exception was poor functioning of the Reward scale. Concurrent validity was stronger at the group than at the individual level, and assessment of associations with clinicians’ intentions to use evidence- based practices showed positive correlations.ConclusionsThe Norwegian version of the ICS is a promising tool for assessing implementation climate which can provide organizations with specific feedback concerning which aspects of the implementation climate to attend to. Due to poor functioning of the Reward scale, adaptations and further testing of this is recommended.


2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (7) ◽  
pp. 710-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rinad S. Beidas ◽  
Rebecca E. Stewart ◽  
Courtney Benjamin Wolk ◽  
Danielle R. Adams ◽  
Steven C. Marcus ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ka Ho Brian Chor ◽  
Kimberly E. Hoagwood ◽  
Su-Chin Serene Olin

Evidence-based practices (EBPs) for children and adolescents have undergone significant transformation in the past decade. This chapter synthesizes the major paradigm shifts in policy, research, and practice. The policy paradigm shifts include healthcare infrastructure changes that reshape the mental health delivery system, accountability of mental health care that is driven by quality indicators, and new financing policies under the Affordable Care Act. The research paradigm shifts include development of innovative dissemination and implementation (D&I) models to improve the spread and uptake of EBPs, and the use of optimal D&I designs and measures to empirically study system-level changes. The practice paradigm shifts include primary care integration, large-scale training, technological advances, and task shifting in EBPs. Moving from laboratory testing and knowledge translation of EBPs in the past decade, the current and future direction of EBPs necessitates concerted responses to these paradigm shifts among policymakers, researchers, practitioners, consumers, and families.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document