scholarly journals Avelumab treatment in Italian patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: experience from an expanded access program

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Grignani ◽  
Vanna Chiarion Sileni ◽  
Carmine Pinto ◽  
Roberta Depenni ◽  
Nicola Fazio ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The incidence of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), a rare form of skin cancer with a poor prognosis, has increased in Italy in recent decades. Avelumab, an anti-programmed death ligand 1 monoclonal antibody, is approved for the treatment of metastatic MCC (mMCC) based on the results of the phase 2 JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial. The global avelumab expanded access program (EAP) was designed to provide compassionate use of avelumab prior to approval for patients with mMCC who had limited treatment options. We report findings from a subgroup of Italian patients enrolled in the avelumab EAP. Methods Eligible patients had mMCC and progressive disease following ≥ 1 prior line of chemotherapy or were ineligible for chemotherapy or clinical trial participation. Patients received avelumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks. Treating physicians were provided with an initial 3-month supply of avelumab; resupply was permitted if the patient achieved a complete response, partial response, stable disease, or other clinical benefit per physician assessment. Safety and efficacy data for the EAP were reported at the treating physician’s discretion. Results Between April 1, 2016, and September 14, 2018, 109 requests for avelumab were received from Italy, and 102 were approved. All but 1 of the approved patients had received ≥ 1 prior line of therapy. At data cutoff (March 22, 2019), 95 patients had been supplied with avelumab and response data were available for 55 patients. The objective response rate in response-evaluable patients was 29.1%, including 6 patients (10.9%) who achieved a complete response and 10 patients (18.2%) who achieved a partial response; in the total population supplied with avelumab (n = 95), the proportion who had an objective response was 16.8%. The median duration of treatment in responding patients was 9.7 months (range, 3.5–41.7 months). The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events were infusion-related reaction (single preferred term; n = 3 [3.2%]) and pyrexia (n = 2 [2.1%]). Conclusions Results from Italian patients enrolled in the avelumab EAP are consistent with the findings of the JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial and confirm the efficacy and safety of avelumab treatment in this population.

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. viii460-viii461
Author(s):  
P. Nathan ◽  
V. Kasturi ◽  
L. Dirix ◽  
E. Fenig ◽  
P.A. Ascierto ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9537-9537 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Walker ◽  
Vijay Kasturi ◽  
Celeste Lebbe ◽  
Shahneen Kaur Sandhu ◽  
Giovanni Grignani ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000313 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W Walker ◽  
Celeste Lebbé ◽  
Giovanni Grignani ◽  
Paul Nathan ◽  
Luc Dirix ◽  
...  

BackgroundAvelumab, a human anti–programmed death-ligand 1 immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody, showed favorable efficacy and safety in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) in the phase II JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial, leading to approval in multiple countries. We describe real-world experience with avelumab in patients with mMCC from an expanded access program.MethodsEligible patients had mMCC and progressive disease during or after chemotherapy or were ineligible for chemotherapy or clinical trial participation. Patients received an initial 3-month supply of avelumab (administered as 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity); resupply was allowed following complete response, partial response, stable disease, or clinical benefit per physician assessment.ResultsBetween December 15, 2015, and March 4, 2019, 558 of 620 requests from 38 countries were medically approved, and 494 patients received avelumab. Among 240 evaluable patients, the objective response rate was 46.7% (complete response in 22.9%, including 3 of 16 potentially immunocompromised patients), and the disease control rate was 71.2%. The median duration of treatment in evaluable patients with response was 7.9 months (range, 1.0–41.7) overall and 5.2 months (range, 3.0–13.9) in immunocompromised patients. No new safety signals were identified. The expanded access program closed for new requests on December 31, 2018, as required after regulatory approval; benefitting patients continued to receive avelumab.ConclusionsThe avelumab expanded access program for patients with mMCC demonstrated efficacy and safety in a real-world setting, consistent with the results from JAVELIN Merkel 200, and provided a treatment for patients with limited options.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21053-e21053
Author(s):  
Joyson Poulose ◽  
Megan Wheelden ◽  
Heath B. Mackley ◽  
Carla Schmeck ◽  
Junjia Zhu ◽  
...  

e21053 Background: Melanoma and Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC) are aggressive cutaneous malignancies with poor responses to cytotoxic chemotherapy. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has substantially improved outcomes in metastatic disease and in the neoadjuvant setting. Addition of concurrent radiation therapy (RT) can augment the response of ICI, however there are little data on this combined approach as a neoadjuvant or non-operative strategy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of patients who received RT combined with an ICI against PD1, PD-L1, CTLA-4, or dual targets as neoadjuvant or definitive non-operative management for non-polymetastatic disease at our center from 2012 to 2018. Results: This study analyzed 14 patients, 7 males and 7 females, with a median age of 75 years. There were 10 patients with melanoma and 4 patients with MCC. Among them, 9 patients had stage III disease and 5 patients had oligometastatic disease. Prior treatments included surgery (71%), radiation (21%), and immunotherapy (21%) comprising interferon alpha (1), intralesional BCG (1), and Nivolumab (1). The ICI used were Pembrolizumab (5), Nivolumab (2), Avelumab (2), Ipilumumab (4) and Ipilumumab + Nivolumab (1). Immune related adverse events were seen in 8 patients and included endocrine (5), skin (4), and gastrointestinal (2) toxicity, majority of which were grade 1. Both grade 3 dermatitis and colitis were seen in 2 patients, and 1 patient had grade 3 colitis. There was 1 patient with grade 1 radiation dermatitis. Following concurrent ICI + RT, 4 patients who did not achieve a complete response (CR) at the irradiated site underwent surgical resection with no postoperative complications. An objective response at the irradiated site was seen in 13 (93%) patients, and 12 (86%) patients achieved a CR outside the radiated field. At the time of last follow up, 10 patients remain alive, of which 8 patients are in sustained complete remission. Conclusions: Concurrent use of ICI + RT was a safe approach in patients with locally advanced or medically inoperable melanoma and MCC with potential for durable complete remissions in the majority. Prospective studies are warranted to further validate this approach.


2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 23-35
Author(s):  
N.  V. Karpova ◽  
M.  V. Ivanov ◽  
V.  A. Mileiko ◽  
A.  A. Rumyantsev ◽  
T.  A. Titova ◽  
...  

Abstract: Nivolumab was registered in Russia in December 2016 as a monotherapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and it remains a second‑line treatment choice for patients with disease progression after the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Even though immunotherapy has already proven to be an effective approach for the treatment of RCC, predictive biomarkers for the rational selection of patients remain unidentified.Seventy‑five patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who received nivolumab in the 2nd and subsequent lines of therapy from 2015 to 2020 under the expanded access program were enrolled in this study. The objective response rate was 21,3 %. Median progression‑free survival (PFS) was 5,5 months. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached.To analyze molecular biomarkers correlated with the response to immunotherapeutic treatment, we performed whole‑transcriptome RNA sequencing of 16 samples (FFPE) in 15 patients with the assessment of the expression level for individual genes (PDCD1, CD274, CD8A, CD8B, CD4) and gene signatures (Angio, Teff, Myeloid Inflammation).Disease control rates were not different for the subgroups of patients with high and low expression of any of the signatures examined, and further principal component analysis did not reveal clustering of patients with and without objective response.Further studies on a larger sample of patients will help confirm or deny the predictive role of biomarkers selected for analysis in a heterogeneous population of RCC patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document