scholarly journals Analysis and validation of a highly sensitive one-step nested quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for specific detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Zhang ◽  
Chunyang Dai ◽  
Huiyan Wang ◽  
Yong Gao ◽  
Tuantuan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Pcr Assay ◽  
Qrt Pcr ◽  
Highly Sensitive ◽  
One Step ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by SARS-CoV-2, is posing a serious threat to global public health. Reverse transcriptase real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) is widely used as the gold standard for clinical detection of SARS-CoV-2. Due to technical limitations, the reported positive rates of qRT-PCR assay of throat swab samples vary from 30 to 60%. Therefore, the evaluation of alternative strategies to overcome the limitations of qRT-PCR is required. A previous study reported that one-step nested (OSN)-qRT-PCR revealed better suitability for detecting SARS-CoV-2. However, information on the analytical performance of OSN-qRT-PCR is insufficient. Method In this study, we aimed to analyze OSN-qRT-PCR by comparing it with droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and qRT-PCR by using a dilution series of SARS-CoV-2 pseudoviral RNA and a quality assessment panel. The clinical performance of OSN-qRT-PCR was also validated and compared with ddPCR and qRT-PCR using specimens from COVID-19 patients. Result The limit of detection (copies/ml) of qRT-PCR, ddPCR, and OSN-qRT-PCR were 520.1 (95% CI: 363.23–1145.69) for ORF1ab and 528.1 (95% CI: 347.7–1248.7) for N, 401.8 (95% CI: 284.8–938.3) for ORF1ab and 336.8 (95% CI: 244.6–792.5) for N, and 194.74 (95% CI: 139.7–430.9) for ORF1ab and 189.1 (95% CI: 130.9–433.9) for N, respectively. Of the 34 clinical samples from COVID-19 patients, the positive rates of OSN-qRT-PCR, ddPCR, and qRT-PCR were 82.35% (28/34), 67.65% (23/34), and 58.82% (20/34), respectively. Conclusion In conclusion, the highly sensitive and specific OSN-qRT-PCR assay is superior to ddPCR and qRT-PCR assays, showing great potential as a technique for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with low viral loads.

scholarly journals Analysis and validation of a highly sensitive one-step nested quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for specific detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Zhang ◽  
Chunyang Dai ◽  
Huiyan Wang ◽  
Yong Gao ◽  
Tuantuan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Pcr Assay ◽  
Qrt Pcr ◽  
Highly Sensitive ◽  
One Step ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by SARS-CoV-2, is posing a serious threat to global public health. Reverse transcriptase real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) is widely used as the gold standard for clinical detection of SARS-CoV-2. Due to technical limitations, the reported positive rates of qRT-PCR assay of throat swab samples vary from 30–60%. Therefore, the evaluation of alternative strategies to overcome the limitations of qRT-PCR is required. A previous study reported that one-step nested (OSN)-qRT-PCR revealed better suitability for detecting SARS-CoV-2. However, information on the analytical performance of OSN-qRT-PCR is insufficient. Method: In this study, we aimed to analyze OSN-qRT-PCR by comparing it with droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and qRT-PCR by using a dilution series of SARS-CoV-2 pseudoviral RNA and a quality assessment panel. The clinical performance of OSN-qRT-PCR was also validated and compared with ddPCR and qRT-PCR using specimens from COVID-19 patients. Result The LoD (copies/ml) of qRT-PCR, ddPCR, and OSN-qRT-PCR were 520.1 (95% CI): 363.23–1145.69) for ORF1ab and 528.1 (95% CI: 347.7–1248.7) for N, 401.8 (95% CI: 284.8–938.3) for ORF1ab and 336.8 (95% CI: 244.6–792.5) for N, and 194.74 (95% CI: 139.7–430.9) for ORF1ab and 189.1 (95% CI: 130.9–433.9) for N, respectively. Of the 34 clinical samples from COVID-19 patients, the positive rates of OSN-qRT-PCR, ddPCR, and qRT-PCR were 82.35% (28/34), 67.65% (23/34), and 58.82% (20/34), respectively. Conclusion In conclusion, the highly sensitive and specific OSN-qRT-PCR assay is superior to ddPCR and qRT-PCR assays, showing great potential as a technique for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with low viral loads.

scholarly journals Analysis and validation of a highly sensitive one-step nested quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for specific detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Zhang ◽  
Chunyang Dai ◽  
Huiyan Wang ◽  
Yong Gao ◽  
Tuantuan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Pcr Assay ◽  
Qrt Pcr ◽  
Highly Sensitive ◽  
One Step ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by SARS-CoV-2, is posing a serious threat to global public health. Reverse transcriptase real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) is widely used as the gold standard for clinical detection of SARS-CoV-2. Due to technical limitations, the reported positive rates of qRT-PCR assay of throat swab samples vary from 30%-60%. Therefore, the evaluation of alternative strategies to overcome the limitations of qRT-PCR is required. A previous study reported that one-step nested (OSN)-qRT-PCR revealed better suitability for detecting SARS-CoV-2. However, information on the analytical performance of OSN-qRT-PCR is insufficient. In this study, we aimed to analyze OSN-qRT-PCR by comparing it with droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and qRT-PCR by using a dilution series of SARS-CoV-2 pseudoviral RNA and a quality assessment panel. The clinical performance of OSN-qRT-PCR was also validated and compared with ddPCR and qRT-PCR using specimens from COVID-19 patients. The LoD (copies/ml) of qRT-PCR, ddPCR, and OSN-qRT-PCR were 520.1 (95% CI): 363.23-1145.69) for ORF1ab and 528.1 (95% CI: 347.7-1248.7) for N, 401.8 (95% CI: 284.8-938.3) for ORF1ab and 336.8 (95% CI: 244.6-792.5) for N, and 194.74 (95% CI: 139.7-430.9) for ORF1ab and 189.1 (95% CI: 130.9-433.9) for N, respectively. Of the 34 clinical samples from COVID-19 patients, the positive rates of OSN-qRT-PCR, ddPCR, and qRT-PCR were 82.35% (28/34), 67.65% (23/34), and 58.82% (20/34), respectively. In conclusion, the highly sensitive and specific OSN-qRT-PCR assay is superior to ddPCR and qRT-PCR assays, showing great potential as a technique for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with low viral loads.

Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of BK Virus Using Labeled Primers

2010 ◽  
Vol 134 (3) ◽  
pp. 444-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengming Gu ◽  
Jianmin Pan ◽  
Matthew J. Bankowski ◽  
Randall T. Hayden
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Real Time Pcr ◽  
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Bk Virus ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Quantitative Detection ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Pcr Method ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Abstract Context.—BK virus infections among immunocompromised patients are associated with disease of the kidney or urinary bladder. High viral loads, determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), have been correlated with clinical disease. Objective.—To develop and evaluate a novel method for real-time PCR detection and quantification of BK virus using labeled primers. Design.—Patient specimens (n = 54) included 17 plasma, 12 whole blood, and 25 urine samples. DNA was extracted using the MagNA Pure LC Total Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, Indiana); sample eluate was PCR-amplified using the labeled primer PCR method. Results were compared with those of a user-developed quantitative real-time PCR method (fluorescence resonance energy transfer probe hybridization). Results.—Labeled primer PCR detected less than 10 copies per reaction and showed quantitative linearity from 101 to 107 copies per reaction. Analytical specificity of labeled primer PCR was 100%. With clinical samples, labeled primer PCR demonstrated a trend toward improved sensitivity compared with the reference method. Quantitative assay comparison showed an R2 value of 0.96 between the 2 assays. Conclusions.—Real-time PCR using labeled primers is highly sensitive and specific for the quantitative detection of BK virus from a variety of clinical specimens. These data demonstrate the applicability of labeled primer PCR for quantitative viral detection and offer a simplified method that removes the need for separate oligonucleotide probes.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Amplification Targets for the Specific Detection ofBordetella pertussisUsing Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 217-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Rubayet Hasan ◽  
Rusung Tan ◽  
Ghada N Al-Rawahi ◽  
Eva Thomas ◽  
Peter Tilley
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Reference Panel ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Pcr Assay ◽  
Polymerase Chain

BACKGROUND:Bordetella pertussisinfections continue to be a major public health challenge in Canada. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays to detectB pertussisare typically based on the multicopy insertion sequence IS481, which offers high sensitivity but lacks species specificity.METHODS: A novelB pertussisreal-time PCR assay based on the porin gene was tested in parallel with several previously published assays that target genes such as IS481,ptx-promoter, pertactin and a putative thialase. The assays were evaluated using a reference panel of common respiratory bacteria including differentBordetellaspecies and 107 clinical nasopharyngeal specimens. Discrepant results were confirmed by sequencing the PCR products.RESULTS: Analytical sensitivity was highest for the assay targeting the IS481element; however, the assay lacked specificity forB pertussisin the reference panel and in the clinical samples. False-positive results were also observed with assays targeting theptx-promoter and pertactin genes. A PCR assay based on the thialase gene was highly specific but failed to detect all reference strains ofB pertussis. However, a novel assay targeting the porin gene demonstrated high specificity forB pertussisboth in the reference panel and in clinical samples and, based on sequence-confirmed results, correctly predicted allB pertussis-positive cases in clinical samples. According to Probit regression analysis, the 95% detection limit of the new assay was 4 colony forming units/reaction.CONCLUSION: A novel porin assay forB pertussisdemonstrated superior performance and may be useful for improved molecular detection ofB pertussisin clinical specimens.

scholarly journals Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction assay for the detection of COVID-19 from clinical samples in low-and middle-income countries: Protocol

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Oladipo Babafemi
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Pcr Assay ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Abstract Background: COVID-19 has spread globally since its discovery in Hubei province, China in December 2019 and became pandemic in 2020. COVID-19 is a new betacoronavirus and a variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARA- CoV-2). Rapid, accurate and reliable diagnosis of COVID-19 will prevent the spread and allow for appropriate management. The main objective of this systematic review is to identify, appraise and summarise the published evidence on the diagnostic performance and effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 virus in the diagnosis of current or previous COVID-19 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: We will search MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, BIOSIS, LILACS, Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialised Register (CIDG SR), Global Health, and CINAHL for published studies for the diagnosis of COVID-19 using real-time polymerase chain reaction assay in LMICs There will be no restriction regarding the language, date of publication, and publication status. We will include retrospective, cross-sectional and cohort observational studies will be included in the review. Selection of studies, data extraction and management, assessment of risk of bias, and quality of evidence will be performed by two independent reviewers (EB and BC). A third researcher (GM) will be consulted in case of discrepancies. Depending on the availability and quality of the data, a meta-analysis will be performed. Otherwise, findings will be qualitatively reported. Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the uptake of RT-PCR assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection from clinical samples in human in LMICs. This review will make available evidence on the uptake, accuracy, approach, and interpretation of results of this assay in the context of COVID-19 diagnosis which will meet an urgent need, considering the diagnostic challenges of RT-PCR assay for COVID-19 diagnosis in humans. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42021271894

scholarly journals Multiple-Centre Clinical Evaluation of Rapid Recombinase-Aided Amplification Assays for Five Pathogens

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin-xin Shen ◽  
Dan-wen Nie ◽  
Hong Zhang ◽  
Zhi-fei Zhan ◽  
Yuan Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Reverse Transcription ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Human Adenovirus ◽  
Molecular Diagnostic ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Qrt Pcr ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Abstract Background: Recombinase-aided amplification(RAA) is a new, simple, and ultrafast isothermal molecular diagnostic technique performed within 30min at 39°C–42°C.In this study, we evaluated the clinical performance of four duplex RAA kits for hepatitis B virus(HBV), human adenovirus 3(HAdV3), human adenovirus 7(HAdV7), and Bordetella pertussis and one duplex reverse-transcription RAA (RT-RAA) kit for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).Methods: A total of 392 sera and 374 respiratory tract samples were collected from five institutions in four China regions. Each RAA kit’s sensitivity and specificity were compared with those of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction(qPCR),real-time quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction(qRT-PCR), or sequencing. Results: Compared with qPCR or qRT-PCR, the sensitivities of HBV RAA,RSV RT-RAA, and B.pertussis RAA were 97.55%,96.67%, and 100%,respectively,and all of the specificities were 100%.The total coincidence rates were 97.78%(383/392,95%CI:95.63%–98.85%),97.70%(212/217, 95%CI:94.57%–99.16%), and 100%(60/60,95%CI:92.80%–100%),respectively.The Kappa values were 0.977,0.947, and 1,respectively(P<0.05).Regarding the sequencing, the sensitivities of HAdV3 RAA and HAdV7 RAA were 100% and 97.37%, respectively,and all specificities were 100%.The total coincidence rates were 100%(97/97,95%CI:91.58%–100%) and 98.97%(96/97,95%CI:94.39%–99.82%),and the Kappa values were 1 and 0.978 (P<0.05),respectively.Conclusions: With comparable clinical performance, these RAA kits are suitable assays for rapidly detecting pathogens in resource-limited laboratories.

Optimization of 6-carboxy-X-rhodamine concentration for real-time polymerase chain reaction using molecular beacon chemistry

2007 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 391-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gehua Wang ◽  
Erin Becker ◽  
Christine Mesa
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Real Time Pcr ◽  
Molecular Beacon ◽  
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Luxs Gene ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Pcr Assay ◽  
Shiga Toxin 2 ◽  
Polymerase Chain

The optimal 6-carboxy-X-rhodamine (ROX) concentration, which is used as a passive reference dye for real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with molecular beacon chemistry, was determined with the Mx4000™ Multiplex Quantitative PCR System. Additionally, the effects of changing ROX concentrations on PCR reproducibility, Ct values, and efficiency were investigated with this system by using the PCR data obtained from amplification of the Escherichia coli shiga toxin 2 (stx2) gene and the Campylobacter jejuni luxS gene. This study indicated that different ROX concentrations influence many aspects of the real-time PCR reaction. ROX concentration variation could have consequences in the analysis of quantitative data and may lead to erroneous results. This study further indicated that the optimal ROX concentration is 60 nmol/L for real-time PCR, using molecular beacon chemistry for PCR assay of luxS and stx2 genes.

scholarly journals MMP1 is a Promiseful Prognostic Biomarker and Correlating with Immune Infiltrates in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Dai ◽  
Joseph Muggnyi ◽  
xingchen cai ◽  
shuqi mao ◽  
tongyue zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Reverse Transcription ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Human Adenovirus ◽  
Molecular Diagnostic ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Qrt Pcr ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Abstract Background: Recombinase-aided amplification(RAA) is a new, simple, and ultrafast isothermal molecular diagnostic technique performed within 30min at 39°C–42°C.In this study, we evaluated the clinical performance of four duplex RAA kits for hepatitis B virus(HBV), human adenovirus 3(HAdV3), human adenovirus 7(HAdV7), and Bordetella pertussis and one duplex reverse-transcription RAA (RT-RAA) kit for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).Methods: A total of 392 sera and 374 respiratory tract samples were collected from five institutions in four China regions. Each RAA kit’s sensitivity and specificity were compared with those of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction(qPCR),real-time quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction(qRT-PCR), or sequencing. Results: Compared with qPCR or qRT-PCR, the sensitivities of HBV RAA,RSV RT-RAA, and B.pertussis RAA were 97.55%,96.67%, and 100%,respectively,and all of the specificities were 100%.The total coincidence rates were 97.78%(383/392,95%CI:95.63%–98.85%),97.70%(212/217, 95%CI:94.57%–99.16%), and 100%(60/60,95%CI:92.80%–100%),respectively. The Kappa values were 0.977,0.947, and 1,respectively(P<0.05).Regarding the sequencing, the sensitivities of HAdV3 RAA and HAdV7 RAA were 100% and 97.37%, respectively, and all specificities were 100%.The total coincidence rates were 100%(97/97,95%CI:91.58%–100%) and 98.97%(96/97,95%CI:94.39%–99.82%),and the Kappa values were 1 and 0.978 (P<0.05),respectively.Conclusions: With comparable clinical performance, these RAA kits are suitable assays for rapidly detecting pathogens in resource-limited laboratories.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document