scholarly journals Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of universal pre-operative iron studies in total hip and knee arthroplasty

Author(s):  
Viju Daniel Varghese ◽  
David Liu ◽  
Donald Ngo ◽  
Suzanne Edwards

Abstract Background The prevalence of anaemia in patients planned for total hip and knee arthroplasty is about 20%. Optimising pre-operative haemoglobin levels by iron supplementation has been shown to decrease transfusion rates, complications and associated morbidity. The need for universal screening with iron studies of all elective arthroplasty patients is not clearly defined at present. Methods Retrospective review of 2 sequential cohorts of patients undergoing primary hip or knee arthroplasty by a single surgeon at a single centre between January 2013 and December 2017. The first group of patients underwent pre-operative iron studies only if found to be anaemic, with a haemoglobin below 12g/dl. From January 2015, all patients irrespective of the presence of anaemia were screened with a complete iron profile before surgery. Patients with a confirmed iron deficiency were administered with intravenous iron prior to surgery. The 2 cohorts were compared with regard to blood transfusion rate post-operatively and cost efficiency for universal screening with iron studies. Results There was a net decrease in the allogenic blood transfusion rate from 4.76 to 2.92% when universal iron studies were introduced but the difference was not statistically significant. Obtaining universal pre-operative iron studies is cost neutral with the price of allogenic blood transfusion in a similar cohort. We also diagnosed 5 patients with occult malignancies. Conclusions Universal screening with pre-operative iron studies and iron infusion in elective arthroplasty patients may reduce allogenic blood requirements and is cost neutral. An additional benefit is the potential to diagnose asymptomatic malignancies. Further studies are required to show the true benefit of universal pre-operative iron screening.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viju Daniel Varghese ◽  
David Liu ◽  
Donald Ngo ◽  
Suzanne Edwards

Abstract Background Prevalence of anaemia in patients planned for total hip and knee arthroplasty is about 20%. Optimising preoperative haemoglobin levels by iron supplementation has been shown to decrease transfusion rates, complications and associated morbidity. The need for universal screening with iron studies of all elective arthroplasty patients is not clearly defined at present. Methods Retrospective review of 2 sequential cohorts of patients undergoing primary hip or knee arthroplasty by a single surgeon at a single centre between January 2013 and December 2017. The first group of patients underwent pre-operative iron studies only if found to be anaemic, with a haemoglobin below 12g/dL. From January 2015 all patients irrespective of the presence of anaemia were screened with a complete iron profile before surgery. Patients with a confirmed iron deficiency were administered with intravenous iron prior to surgery. The 2 cohorts were compared with regards to blood transfusion rate post-operatively and cost efficiency for universal screening with iron studies. Results There was a net decrease in allogenic blood transfusion rate from 4.76–2.92% when universal iron studies were introduced but the difference was not statistically significant. Obtaining universal pre-operative iron studies is cost neutral with the price of allogenic blood transfusion in a similar cohort. We also diagnosed 5 patients with occult malignancies. Conclusions Universal screening with pre-operative iron studies and iron infusion in elective arthroplasty patients may reduce allogenic blood requirements and is cost neutral. An additional benefit is the potential to diagnose asymptomatic malignancies. Further studies are required to show the true benefit of universal pre-operative iron screening.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 39-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Liu ◽  
Michael Dan ◽  
Natalie Adivi

Peri-operative blood management is one of a number of components important for successful patient care in total joint arthroplasty and surgeons should be proactive in its application. The aims of blood conservation are to reduce the risks of blood transfusion whilst at the same time maximizing haemaglobin in the post-operative period, thereby leading to a positive effect on early and long term outcomes and costs. An individualized strategy based on patient specific risk factors, anticipated blood loss and co-morbidities is useful in achieving this aim. Multiple blood conservation strategies are available in the pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative periods and can be utilised either individually or in combination. Recent literature has highlighted the importance of identifying and correcting pre-operative anaemia, salvaging peri-operative red cells and the use of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss. Given total hip and knee arthroplasty is an elective procedure, a zero allogenic blood transfusion rate should be the aim and an achievable goal. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-16
Author(s):  
Yoeri Bemelmans ◽  
Emil Van Haaren ◽  
Bert Boonen ◽  
Roel Hendrickx ◽  
Martijn Schotanus

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of a tranexamic acid (TXA) perioperative protocol for primary hip- and knee arthroplasty, in terms of allogenic blood transfusion rates. A retrospective cohort study was conducted and included all primary hip and knee arthroplasty procedures in the period of 2014-2019. Patients who underwent surgery due to trauma or revision were excluded. A total amount of 5205 patients were eligible for inclusion. Two equal and weight depending doses of TXA were given, preoperative as an oral dose and intravenously at wound closure. The primary outcome was blood transfusion rate. Further analysis on patient characteristics (e.g. age, gender), blood loss, perioperative haemoglobin (Hb) levels and complication/readmission rate was performed. A total of 49 (0.9%) patients received perioperative allogenic blood transfusions. Mean age, distribution of gender, body-mass index, American Society of Anaesthesiologists score, duration of surgery, type of arthroplasty, estimated blood loss, perioperative Hb levels and length of stay were statistically significant different between transfused and not-transfused patients. The incidence of thromboembolic adverse events (e.g. deep vein thrombosis/lung embolism) was 0.5%. Low blood transfusion rate was found after implementation of a standardized perioperative TXA protocol for primary hip and knee arthroplasty.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e040273
Author(s):  
Sigismond Lasocki ◽  
Thibault Loupec ◽  
Elsa Parot-Schinkel ◽  
Bruno Vielle ◽  
Marc Danguy des Déserts ◽  
...  

IntroductionBlood transfusion and anaemia are frequent and are associated with poor outcomes in patients with hip fracture (HF). We hypothesised that preoperative intravenous iron and tranexamic acid (TXA) may reduce the transfusion rate in these patients.Methods and analysisThe HiFIT study is a multicentre, 2×2 factorial, randomised, double-blinded, controlled trial evaluating the effect of iron isomaltoside (IIM) (20 mg/kg) vs placebo and of TXA (intravenously at inclusion and topically during surgery) versus placebo on transfusion rate during hospitalisation, in patients undergoing emergency surgery for HF and having a preoperative haemoglobin between 95 and 130 g/L. 780 patients are expected. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients receiving an allogenic blood transfusion of packed red blood cells from the day of surgery until hospital discharge (or until D30 if patient is still hospitalised). Enrolment started on March 2017 in 11 French hospitals. The study was stopped between July 2017 and August 2018 (because of investigation of serious AEs with IIM in Spain) and slowed down since March 2020 (COVID-19 crisis). The expected date of final follow-up is May 2022. Analyses of the intent-to-treat and per-protocol populations are planned.Ethics and disseminationThe HiFIT trial protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Comité de Protection des Personnes Ouest II and the French authorities (ANSM). It will be carried out according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The results will be disseminated through presentation at scientific conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals. The HiFIT trial will be the largest study evaluating iron and TXA in patients with HF.Trial registration numberclinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02972294; EudraCT Number 2016-003087-40.


2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 378-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua B. Holt ◽  
Benjamin J. Miller ◽  
John J. Callaghan ◽  
Charles R. Clark ◽  
Melissa D. Willenborg ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document