Preoperative Hemoglobin Optimization in Jehovah's Witness Cardiovascular Surgery Patients with Anemia and Barriers to Care

Cardiac surgery has a risk for extensive blood loss which poses a particular challenge in individuals refusing blood transfusions. Additionally, preoperative anemia with a hemoglobin (Hb) below 13 g/dL in men and 12 g/dL in women is associated with increased short and long-term complications and mortality and increases the need for blood transfusion support. The current guidelines for perioperative anemia management recommend optimizing hemoglobin levels prior to surgery and utilizing blood conservation techniques during the procedure. At present red blood cell (RBC) transfusions during cardiac surgery are usually recommended when Hb levels are below 7-8 g/dL a restrictive transfusion strategy to reduce complications. However, the use of any RBC transfusions is associated with worse outcomes in cardiac surgery compared with those who do not receive transfusions. We have found that JW seek out quality health care and accept the vast majority of medical treatments once they are educated. The Transfusion Free Medicine Coordinator's role in the Anemia Clinic is to endorse clinical strategies for managing hemorrhage and anemia without blood transfusion. They educate and counsel the patients so they can decide as to what blood fractions and cell salvage techniques they will accept. We have found that some Health Care Providers are unaware that ESAs also contain albumin so JW patients may be given this product without that knowledge. The vast majority of patients will accept the use of ESAs but find the cost prohibitive. Jehovah's Witness patients have provided a natural case study for examining how well adjuvant therapies can improve preoperative anemia without transfusions and continue with good outcomes. Hb optimization is achieved through the use of intravenous iron and, if needed, erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs). In Table 1 we highlight our single center data in which all cardiovascular surgeries were performed by a surgeon experienced in blood-conservation strategies. Our thirty-day re-admission rates for all patients was zero percent, compared to state-specific data, which estimates about an 11.7% rate of re-admission. The data illustrate the need to have a target Hb 13 or above to allow for the decline that may occur during the hospital stay. Of note no thromboembolic events have occurred with the use of an ESA in this group. Although ESAs are approved to optimize Hb in orthopedic surgery, they are not covered for cardiac surgery which has presented a significant challenge to patients who can not safely proceed to surgery until a target Hb between 13 to 15 g/dL is achieved. These data highlight the utility and safety associated with the use of ESAs for patients who do not accept blood products at an experienced Center for Transfusion-Free Medicine, such as ours. At this time, since insurance companies do not cover the cost of ESAs for patients needing life-saving cardiovascular operations, cost is a prohibitive barrier for patients. Unfortunately, it is not uncommon for patients to have to borrow money from others or set up payment plans. We hope that analyses like ours will help drive changes in reimbursement policies, particularly for patients who based on religious convictions, cannot receive blood products, and thus for whom pre-operative hemoglobin optimization is of utmost importance. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. OffLabel Disclosure: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) are indicated for the treatment of anemia due to Chronic Kidney Disease in patients on dialysis and not on dialysis, Zidovudine in patients with HIV-infection, anemia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy and reduction of allogeneic RBC transfusions in patients undergoing elective, noncardiac, nonvascular surgery

Blood Conservation Strategies in Adult Sickle Cell Patients on Chronic Transfusion Therapy: A Single Center Experience

Background: Adult sickle cell patients on chronic transfusion therapy (CTT) garnered special concern during the COVID-19 pandemic, when mass cancellation of blood drives threatened the national blood supply. In response, the American Society of Hematology proposed several strategies to decrease blood utilization, while maintaining adequate disease control for sickle cell patients on CTT. These included targeting a higher end hemoglobin S%, switching patients to simple transfusions when appropriate, and transitioning to alternative disease modifying therapies. There is little evidence to support the safety of altering exchange therapy regimens. Accordingly, at the Johns Hopkins Sickle Cell Center for Adults, a multidisciplinary team of clinicians and transfusion medicine specialists evaluated patients on a case by case basis to determine how their exchanges could be modified to accommodate for anticipated blood supply shortages. We describe our blood conservation efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting clinical outcomes for adult patients with sickle cell anemia (SCA). Methods: For inclusion in this IRB-approved retrospective study, patients received at least 7 monthly exchange transfusions between March 2019 and February 2020 and continued care through March 2021. Decisions regarding CTT were made prior to data collection. Modifications to chronic exchanges included increasing the fraction of cells remaining (FCR), decreasing the end hematocrit, or switching to a hemodilution method. Additionally, select patients transitioned to monthly simple transfusions if they were clinically stable, had a hemoglobin ≤ 7 g/dL, and had a persistently suppressed hemoglobin S% (≤ 30). We collected basic demographics, pre-exchange laboratory studies, and exchange parameters before and after each transfusion encounter in the year before (March 2019 - February 2020) and during (March 2020 - February 2021) the COVID-19 pandemic. Lastly, we recorded presentations to urgent care and the emergency department; and hospital admissions during each time period. We reported descriptive statistics for the cohort and compared outcomes using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Mann Whitney U test. We analyzed data using Stata/SE Version 16.1. Results: We identified 58 patients with SCA who qualified for inclusion (Table 1). Fifty-three patients remained on chronic exchange transfusions during the pandemic, and five were switched to simple transfusions. For patients who remained on chronic exchanges, most received conventional automated red cell exchange (RCE) prior to (85%) and during the pandemic (77%). Use of hemodilution increased (15% to 23% of patients). Forty-three patients experienced an increase in mean FCR (33.6 (SD 11.6) vs 37.7 (4.7), p = .00). Of those, 22 patients saw a concomitant decrease in mean end hematocrit (30.8 (1.7) vs 29.6 (1.1), p = .00). These changes resulted in a decline in the average number of units per procedure (8.6 (1.9) vs 7.3 (1.7), p = .00), which corresponded to 890 units conserved. Mean pre-transfusion hemoglobin values declined (9.4 (1.3) vs 9.2 (1.3), p = 0.01), but hemoglobin S%, reticulocyte count, and ferritin values were unchanged (p > 0.05). Acute care presentations and hospital admissions declined, which were likely spurred by concerns about COVID-19 infection (Table 2, p < 0.05). During the pandemic, three patients died, one of whom had been switched to simple transfusions. This patient experienced a consistent rise in hemoglobin S% until death. Two of the remaining patients on simple transfusions were switched back to automated RCE due to an increase in hemoglobin S% above goal (Figure 1). Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, we conserved red blood cell units through expanded use of hemodilution, higher FCR values, and switching some patients to simple transfusions. Patients who remained on exchanges maintained hemoglobin S% values near a goal of 30% without increasing iron burden. In contrast, the majority of patients who were switched to simple transfusions were unable to maintain goal hematologic parameters, and one patient died. Our data suggest that in a blood shortage crisis, changing the exchange procedure itself may be the safest means of conserving blood in a population of adult sickle cell patients; however longer follow-up is needed to ensure that these changes are safe. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Lanzkron: GBT: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Pfizer: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Teva: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Novartis: Research Funding; Imara: Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy.

Blood Conservation and Hemostasis Management in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery

Pediatric cardiac surgery is associated with significant perioperative blood loss needing blood product transfusion. Transfusion carries serious risks and implications on clinical outcomes in this vulnerable population. The need for transfusion is higher in children and is attributed to several factors including immaturity of the hemostatic system, hemodilution from the CPB circuit, excessive activation of the hemostatic system, and preoperative anticoagulant drugs. Other patient characteristics such as smaller relative size of the patient, higher metabolic and oxygen requirements make successful blood transfusion management extremely challenging in this population and require meticulous planning and multidisciplinary teamwork. In this narrative review we aim to summarize risks and complications associated with blood transfusion in pediatric cardiac surgery and also to summarize perioperative coagulation management and blood conservation strategies.