scholarly journals Learning curve in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a single-center experience

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anh Tuan Vo ◽  
Dinh Hoang Nguyen ◽  
Sy Van Hoang ◽  
Khoi Minh Le ◽  
Thu Trang Nguyen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is becoming a gold standard and provides many advantages for patients. A learning curve is required for a surgeon to become proficient, and the exact number to overcome this curve is controversial. Our study aimed to define this number for mitral valve surgery in general, for replacement and repair separately. Methods A total of 204 mitral valve surgeries were performed via the right minithoracotomy approach from October 2014 to January 2019 by a single surgeon who isexperienced in conventional mitral valve surgery. Learning curves were analysed based on the trend of important variables (cross-clamp time, CPB time, ventilation time, ICU time, composite technical failure) over time, and the number of operations required was calculated by CUSUM method. Results MIMVS provided an excellent outcome in the carefully selected patients, with low mortality of 0.5% and low rate of complications. The decreasing trend of the important variables were observed over the years and as the cumulative number of procedures increased. The number of operations required to overcome the learning curve was 75 to 100 cases. When considered separately, the quantity for mitral valve replacement was 60 cases, whereas valve repair necessitated at least 90 cases to have an acceptable technical complication rate. Conclusion MIMVS is an excellent choice for mitral valve surgery. However, this approach required a long learning curve for a surgeon who is experienced in conventional mitral valve surgery. Trial registration The research was registered and approved by the ethical board of the University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, number 141/DHYD-HDDD, on April 11th 2018.

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 409-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad-Fawad Jebran ◽  
Shekhar Saha ◽  
Narges Waezi ◽  
Ammar Al-Ahmad ◽  
Heidi Niehaus ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVES Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) through an endoscopic right minithoracotomy is a well-established yet complex procedure that has a challenging learning curve. We have developed a simulator for MIMVS and evaluated its short- and long-term training effects. METHODS Trainees without simulator experience or training in MIMVS were divided into 2 groups (10 students and 10 residents) and participated in a 5-day training course after initial instruction. Each trainee performed a ring annuloplasty. Scores were given by a supervisor who assessed 5 skills. The duration of each procedure was also measured. To evaluate the long-term effect of the training course, trainees performed the same procedure 4 weeks after the last session. RESULTS Trainees in the resident group were significantly older compared to those in the student group and had a mean surgical experience of 4.4 ± 0.78 years standard error of the mean. All other demographic data were similar. Significant learning curves could be achieved in both groups over the course of 5 days with regard to total skill scores and total duration. However, when we compared the learning curves of both groups, no significant difference could be seen. Long-term performance in both groups was still significantly better compared to that in the first training session. CONCLUSIONS Training with our simulator provided a significant enhancement of a trainee’s performance. This learning effect was achieved in both groups and was still evident 4 weeks later. We strongly recommend our simulator for simulation-based surgical education of cardiac surgeons interested in MIMVS.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (sup1) ◽  
pp. 7-7
Author(s):  
Carlos M. Brandao ◽  
Elinthon T. Veronese ◽  
Pablo M. Pomerantzeff ◽  
Marcio S. Lima ◽  
Flavio Tarasoutchi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 2934-2942
Author(s):  
Aleksander Dokollari ◽  
Matteo Cameli ◽  
Didar‐Karan S. Kalra ◽  
Mohammad B. Pervez ◽  
Michalis Demosthenous ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (S 01) ◽  
pp. S1-S110
Author(s):  
S. Westhofen ◽  
C. Detter ◽  
E. Girdauskas ◽  
T. Deuse ◽  
H. Treede ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Cetinkaya ◽  
A Van Linden ◽  
M Schönburg ◽  
J Kempfert ◽  
M Tackenberg ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document