scholarly journals Dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation for traumatic patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chien-Hsin Lu ◽  
Pin-Hui Fang ◽  
Chih-Hao Lin
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Stepwise Logistic Regression ◽  
Population Database ◽  
Stepwise Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Emergency Calls ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background Resuscitation efforts for traumatic patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are not always futile. Dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DA-CPR) during emergency calls could increase the rate of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and thus may enhance survival and neurologic outcomes of non-traumatic OHCA. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of DA-CPR for traumatic OHCA. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using an Utstein-style population database with data from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2016, in Tainan City, Taiwan. Voice recordings of emergency calls were retrospectively retrieved and reviewed. The primary outcome was an achievement of sustained (≥2 h) return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC); the secondary outcomes were prehospital ROSC, ever ROSC, survival at discharge and favourable neurologic status at discharge. Statistical significance was set at a p-value of less than 0.05. Results A total of 4526 OHCA cases were enrolled. Traumatic OHCA cases (n = 560, 12.4%), compared to medical OHCA cases (n = 3966, 87.6%), were less likely to have bystander CPR (10.7% vs. 31.7%, p < 0.001) and initially shockable rhythms (7.1% vs. 12.5%, p < 0.001). Regarding DA-CPR performance, traumatic OHCA cases were less likely to have dispatcher recognition of cardiac arrest (6.3% vs. 42.0%, p < 0.001), dispatcher initiation of bystander CPR (5.4% vs. 37.6%, p < 0.001), or any dispatcher delivery of CPR instructions (2.7% vs. 20.3%, p < 0.001). Stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that witnessed cardiac arrests (aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.10–2.62; p = 0.017) and transportation to level 1 centers (aOR 1.99, 95% CI 1.27–3.13; p = 0.003) were significantly associated with achievement of sustained ROSC in traumatic OHCA cases, while DA-CPR-related variables were not (All p > 0.05). Conclusions DA-CPR was not associated with better outcomes for traumatic OHCA in achieving a sustained ROSC. The DA-CPR program for traumatic OHCAs needs further studies to validate its effectiveness and practicability, especially in the communities where rules for the termination of resuscitation in prehospital settings do not exist.

Abstract 14171: Prehospital Outcomes and Patient Characteristics Associated With PulsePoint Dispatches for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 144 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Salcido ◽  
Christian Martin-Gill ◽  
LEONARD WEISS ◽  
David D Salcido
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Response Time ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
The United States ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Case Characteristics ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: Mobile phone-based dispatch of volunteers to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has been shown to increase the likelihood of early chest compressions and AED application. In the United States, limited characterization of patients encountered as a result of such systems exists, including PulsePoint Respond, a smartphone-based volunteer dispatch system. Objective: Examine prehospital case characteristics and outcomes from a multi-year deployment of PulsePoint in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Methods: Case data, including PulsePoint determinant triggers and timing, prehospital electronic health records (EHRs), and computer aided dispatch records were obtained for suspected EMS-treated OHCA cases that did and did not generate PulsePoint alerts within the service area of Pittsburgh EMS for the period July 2016 to October 2020. EHRs were reviewed to determine true OHCA status, and OHCA case characteristics were extracted according to the Utstein template. Key characteristics and the outcome of prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) were summarized and compared between cases with and without PulsePoint dispatches. Chi-squared tests were used to determine statistical significance of relationships. Results: There were 1229 OHCA cases overall in the capture period, with an estimated 29.6% occurring in public. Of 840 total PulsePoint dispatches, 68 (8.1%) were for true OHCA. Forty-five (66.2%) of these were witnessed, 43 (63.2%) received bystander CPR, and 17 (25%) had an AED applied prior to first responder arrival. Twenty-seven (39.7%) had an initial shockable rhythm, and 34 (50%) achieved ROSC in the field. Compared to non-PulsePoint dispatch generating OHCA, PulsePoint alert-associated patients were significantly more likely to be male (p=0.024), have bystander CPR/AED application performed (p<0.001), have an initial shockable rhythm (p<0.001), and achieve ROSC (p<0.001). EMS response time, age, ALS response time, and witnessed status were not significantly different. Conclusions: A minority of PulsePoint dispatches in Pittsburgh were triggered by true OHCA. Among cases that did generate a PulsePoint dispatch, case characteristics were prognostically favorable.

Abstract 11312: Activation of Citizen Responders to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Temporal Changes During the COVID-19 Outbreak in Denmark 2020

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 144 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mads Christian Tofte Gregers ◽  
Linn Andelius ◽  
Carolina Malta Hansen ◽  
Astrid Rolin Kragh ◽  
Christian Torp-Pedersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Smartphone App ◽  
Hospital Arrival ◽  
Automated External Defibrillators ◽  
Return Of Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Multiple citizen responder (CR) programs worldwide which dispatch laypersons to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) were affected by the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020, but little is known about how the pandemic affected CR activation and initiation of bystander CPR and defibrillation. In Denmark, the CR program continued to run during lockdown but with the recommendation to perform chest-compression-only CPR in contrast to standard CPR including ventilations. We hypothesized that bystander interventions as CPR and AED usage decreased during the first COVID-19 lockdown in two regions of Denmark in the spring of 2020. Methods: All OHCAs from January 1, 2020 to June 30, 2020 with CR activation from the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry and the National Citizen Responder database. Bystander CPR, AED usage, and CRs’ alarm acceptance rate during the national lockdown from March 11, 2020 to April 20, 2020 were compared with the non-lockdown period from January 1, 2020 to March 10, 2020 and from April 21 to June 30, 2020. Results: A total of 6,120 CRs were alerted in 443 (23/100.000 inhabitants) cases of presumed OHCA of which 256 (58%) were confirmed cardiac arrests. Bystander CPR remained equally high in the lockdown period compared with non-lockdown period (99% vs. 92%, p=0.07). Likewise, there was no change in bystander defibrillation (9% vs. 14%, p=0.4). There was a slight increase in the number of CRs who accepted an alarm (7 per alarm, IQR 4) during lockdown compared with non-lockdown period (6 per alarm, IQR 4), p=0.0001. The proportion of patients achieving return of spontaneous circulation at hospital arrival was also unchanged (lockdown 23% vs non-lockdown 23%, p=1.0) (Table 1). Conclusion: Bystander initiated resuscitation rates did not change during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Denmark for OHCAs where CRs were activated through a smartphone app.

scholarly journals Factors Affecting a Successful Out-Of-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / Pirmsslimnīcas Etapa Kardiopulmonālo Reanimāciju Rezultātus Ietekmējošie Faktori

2014 ◽  
Vol 68 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 228-231
Author(s):  
Kaspars Setlers ◽  
Indulis Vanags ◽  
Anita Kalēja
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Heart Rhythm ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract A retrospective patient record analysis of the Emergency Medial Service’s Rîga City Regional Centre was provided from January 2012 through December 2013. 1359 adult patients were CPR treated for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest according to ERC Guidelines 2010. A total of 490 patients were excluded from the study. The main outcome measure was survival to hospital admission. Of 869 CPR-treated patients, 60% (n = 521) were men. The mean age of patients was 66.68 ± 15.28 years. The survival rate to hospital admission was 12.9% (n = 112). 54 of survived patients were women. Mean patient age of successful CPR was 63.22 ± 16.21 and unsuccessful CPR 67.20 ± 15.09. At least one related illness was recorded with 63.4% (n = 551) patients. There were 61 survivors in bystander witnessed OHCA and nine survivors in unwitnessed OHCA. The rate of bystander CPR when CA (cardiac arrest) was witnessed was 24.8%. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) as initial heart rhythm was significantly associated with survival to hospital admission in 54 cases (p < 0.0001). Age and gender affected return of spontaneous circulation. Survival to hospital admission had rhythm-specific outcome. Presence of OHCA witnesses improved outcome compared to bystander CPR. The objective of this study was to report patient characteristics, the role of witnesses in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and outcome of adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation

scholarly journals Community Socioeconomic Status and Dispatcher-Assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 1207
Author(s):  
Ching-Fang Tzeng ◽  
Chien-Hsin Lu ◽  
Chih-Hao Lin
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Public Awareness ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Recognition Rate ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
P Value ◽  
Low Ses ◽  
Neurologic Outcomes ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Few studies have investigated the association between dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DA-CPR) performance and the outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) among communities with different socioeconomic statuses (SES). A retrospective cohort study was conducted using an Utstein-style population OHCA database in Tainan, Taiwan, between January 2014 and December 2015. SES was defined based on real estate prices. The outcome measures included the achievement of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and the performance of DA-CPR. Statistical significance was set at a two-tailed p-value of less than 0.05. A total of 2928 OHCA cases were enrolled in the high SES (n = 1656, 56.6%), middle SES (n = 1025, 35.0%), and low SES (n = 247, 8.4%) groups. The high SES group had a significantly higher prehospital ROSC rate, ever ROSC rate, and sustained ROSC rate and good neurologic outcomes at discharge (all p < 0.005). The low SES group, compared to the high and middle SES groups, had a significantly longer dispatcher recognition time (p = 0.004) and lower early (≤60 s) recognition rate (p = 0.029). The high SES group, but none of the DA-CPR measures, had significant associations with sustained ROSC in the multivariate regression model. The low SES group was associated with a longer time to dispatcher recognition of cardiac arrest and worse outcomes of OHCA. Strategies to promote public awareness of cardiac arrest could be tailored to neighborhood SES.

Abstract MP73: Emergency Call First Strategy versus Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation First Strategy for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 137 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuma Fukuda ◽  
Naoko Ohashi-Fukuda ◽  
Yutaka Kondo ◽  
Kei Hayashida ◽  
Ichiro Kukita
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Emergency Call ◽  
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Lay rescuers have a crucial role in successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), specifically the first three links in the chain of survival, for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, randomized controlled trials on the priority of emergency call (Call first) versus bystander CPR (CPR first) do not exist, and comparative data are very limited. We aimed to assess the association between the priority of bystander’s action (Call first vs. CPR first) and neurologic outcome after OHCA. Methods: This nationwide population-based study of patients who experienced OHCA from January 2005 to December 2014 was based on the data from the Japanese government-managed registry of OHCA. Patients provided bystander’s action (both emergency call and bystander CPR) within 1 minute of witness were included, and Call first strategy was compared with CPR first strategy. The primary outcome was one-month neurologically favorable survival, defined as a Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral performance category (CPC) score of 1(good performance) or 2(moderate disability). The secondary outcomes were prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and one-month overall survival. Results: A total of 25,840 patients were included; 4,430 (17.1%) were treated with Call first approach, and 21,410 (82.9%) were treated with CPR first approach. Among total cohort, 2,696 (10.4%) survived with neurologically favorable status one month after OHCA. In the propensity score-matched cohort, one-month neurologically favorable survival was lower among Call first group compared with CPR first group: 364 of 4,430 patients (8.2%) vs. 457 of 4,430 patients (10.3%), respectively (Risk ratio [RR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.91). Similar associations were observed for one-month overall survival (RR, 0.90; 95%CI, 0.82-0.99), although there were no significant differences in prehospital ROSC (RR, 0.94; 95%CI, 0.86-1.02) between the Call first and CPR first groups. In subgroup analyses, the association between delayed bystander CPR and worse neurological outcome did not change regardless of subgroup characteristics. Conclusions: In witnessed OHCA, Call first approach was associated with a decreased chance of one-month neurologically favorable survival compared with CPR first approach. These observational findings warrant a randomized clinical trial to determine the priority of emergency call or bystander CPR for OHCA.

scholarly journals The Effect of Implementing Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Devices on Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients in an Urban City of Taiwan

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 3636
Author(s):  
Yi-Rong Chen ◽  
Chi-Jiang Liao ◽  
Han-Chun Huang ◽  
Cheng-Han Tsai ◽  
Yao-Sing Su ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Medical Service ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Urban City ◽  
Service Response Time ◽  
Mechanical Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a key element in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation. Mechanical CPR devices have been developed to provide uninterrupted and high-quality CPR. Although human studies have shown controversial results in favor of mechanical CPR devices, their application in pre-hospital settings continues to increase. There remains scant data on the pre-hospital use of mechanical CPR devices in Asia. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective cohort study between September 2018 and August 2020 in an urban city of Taiwan to analyze the effects of mechanical CPR devices on the outcomes of OHCA; the primary outcome was attainment of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Of 552 patients with OHCA, 279 received mechanical CPR and 273 received manual CPR, before being transferred to the hospital. After multivariate adjustment for the influencing factors, mechanical CPR was independently associated with achievement of any ROSC (OR = 1.871; 95%CI:1.195–2.930) and sustained (≥24 h) ROSC (OR = 2.353; 95%CI:1.427–3.879). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that mechanical CPR is beneficial in shorter emergency medical service response time (≤4 min), witnessed cardiac arrest, and non-shockable cardiac rhythm. These findings support the importance of early EMS activation and high-quality CPR in OHCA resuscitation.

Abstract P80: Short-term Outcomes of Vasopressin Administerd with Epinephrine versus Epinephrine Alone in ED for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Yun Kim ◽  
Sun Woo Lee ◽  
Kyuseok Kim ◽  
Joong Eui Rhee ◽  
Sung Koo Jung
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
National Registry ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Emergency Medical Service System ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Combined Administration ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) victims are increasing, but emergency medical service system (EMSS) is not ready for them in Korea. A previous randomized, controlled clinical trial has suggested that vasopressin followed epinephrine was superior to epinephrine in patients with asystole. According to the Korean national registry of OOHCA, patients with asystole were more than two thirds of them. In Korean EMSS, no drugs are permitted to administer in the prehospital phase by law. Thereafter epinephrine or vasopressin cannot be administered until patients are transported to emergency departments (EDs). This study was to evaluate whether the combined administration of vasopressin and epinephrine in ED for OOHCA patients would increase the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival discharge. Methods: From October 2007 to May 2008, we changed the CPR protocol in adult, nontraumatic OOHCA that 40 U of vasopressin was administered as soon as possible after the first dose of epinephrine (the after group). Cardiac arrest data were collected using the Utstein template. Data from January to September 2007, when vasopressin has not been used, were also collected for comparative analysis (the before group). These two groups were compared in terms of ROSC, and survival discharge Results: There were 45 and 50 patients in the before and after groups, respectively. There was no significant differences in the initial ECG rhythm of asystole (67% vs 78%), witnessed arrest (73% vs 72%), bystander CPR (16% vs 10%), time from collapse to BLS time (6 min vs 8.5 min), and time from collapse to study drugs (23 min vs 26.5 min). The rate of sustained ROSC was similar between the before and after groups (53% vs 48%, P=0.604) as was the survival discharge (27% vs 14%, P=0.123). Conclusions: Vasopressin with administerd with epinephrine does not increase the rate of ROSC nor the survival discharge.

Abstract 13131: The Priority of Coronary Arteriography and Therapeutic Hypothermia After Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Patients With Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest. the Result of Sos-kanto 2012 Study

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuichi Hagiwara ◽  
Kiyohiro Oshima ◽  
Masato Murata ◽  
Makoto Aoki ◽  
Kei Hayashida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Therapeutic Hypothermia ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Coronary Arteriography ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
P Value ◽  
Return Of Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Overall Performance ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Aim: To evaluate the priority of coronary angiography (CAG) and therapeutic hypothermia therapy (TH) after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Patients and Methods: SOS-KANTO 2012 study is a prospective, multicenter (69 emergency hospitals) and observational study and includes 16,452 patients with OHCA. Among the cases with ROSC in that study, we intended for patients treated with both CAG and TH within 24 hours after arrival. Those patients were divided into two groups; patients in whom TH was firstly performed (TH group), and the others in whom CAG was firstly done (CAG group). We statistically compared the prognosis between the two groups. SPSS Statistics 22 (IBM, Tokyo, Japan) was used for the statistical analysis. Statistical significance was assumed to be present at a p value of less than 0.05. Result: 233 patients were applied in this study. There were 86 patients in the TH group (M/F: 74/12, mean age; 60.0±15.2 y/o) and 147 in the CAG group (M/F: 126/21, mean age: 63.4±11.1 y/o) respectively, and no significant differences were found in the mean age and M/F ratio between the two groups. The overall performance categories (OPC) one month after ROSC in the both groups were as follows; in the TH group, OPC1: 21 (24.4%), OPC2: 3 (3.5%), OPC3: 7 (8.1%), OPC4: 8 (9.3%), OPC5: 43 (50.0%), unknown: 4 (4.7%), and in the CAG group, OPC1: 38 (25.9%), OPC2: 13 (8.8%), OPC3: 15 (10.2%), OPC4: 18 (12.2%), OPC5: 57 (38.8%), unknown: 6 (4.1%). There were no significant differences in the prognosis one month after ROSC between the two groups. Conclusion: The results which of TH and CAG you give priority to over do not affect the prognosis in patients with OHCA.

scholarly journals Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: Potential for Improvements in Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Chocron ◽  
Julia Jobe ◽  
Sally Guan ◽  
Madeleine Kim ◽  
Mia Shigemura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Medical System ◽  
Emergency Medical System ◽  
Compression Rate ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a critical intervention to improve survival following out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. We evaluated the quality of bystander CPR and whether performance varied according to the number of bystanders or provision of telecommunicator CPR (TCPR). Methods and Results We investigated non‐traumatic out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest occurring in a large metropolitan emergency medical system during a 6‐month period. Information about bystander care was ascertained through review of the 9‐1‐1 recordings in addition to emergency medical system and hospital records to determine bystander CPR status (none versus TCPR versus unassisted), the number of bystanders on‐scene, and CPR performance metrics of compression fraction and compression rate. Of the 428 eligible out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest, 76.4% received bystander CPR including 43.7% unassisted CPR and 56.3% TCPR; 35.2% had one bystander, 33.3% had 2 bystanders, and 31.5% had ≥3 bystanders. Overall compression fraction was 59% with a compression rate of 88 per minute. CPR differed according to TCPR status (fraction=52%, rate=87 per minute for TCPR versus fraction=69%, rate=102 for unassisted CPR, P <0.05 for each comparison) and the number of bystanders (fraction=55%, rate=87 per minute for 1 bystander, fraction=59%, rate=89 for 2 bystanders, fraction=65%, rate=97 for ≥3 bystanders, test for trend P <0.05 for each metric). Additional bystander actions were uncommon to include rotation of compressors (3.1%) or application of an automated external defibrillator (8.0%). Conclusions Bystander CPR quality as gauged by compression fraction and rate approached guideline goals though performance depended upon the type of CPR and number of bystanders.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document