scholarly journals Transfusion practice in the non-bleeding critically ill: an international online survey—the TRACE survey

Critical Care ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanne de Bruin ◽  
◽  
Thomas W. L. Scheeren ◽  
Jan Bakker ◽  
Robin van Bruggen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Over the last decade, multiple large randomized controlled trials have studied alternative transfusion strategies in critically ill patients, demonstrating the safety of restrictive transfusion strategies. Due to the lack of international guidelines specific for the intensive care unit (ICU), we hypothesized that a large heterogeneity in transfusion practice in this patient population exists. The aims of this study were to describe the current transfusion practices and identify the knowledge gaps. Methods An online, anonymous, worldwide survey among ICU physicians was performed evaluating red blood cell, platelet and plasma transfusion practices. Furthermore, the presence of a hospital- or ICU-specific transfusion guideline was asked. Only completed surveys were analysed. Results Nine hundred forty-seven respondents filled in the survey of which 725 could be analysed. Hospital transfusion protocol available in their ICU was reported by 53% of the respondents. Only 29% of respondents used an ICU-specific transfusion guideline. The reported haemoglobin (Hb) threshold for the general ICU population was 7 g/dL (7–7). The highest reported variation in transfusion threshold was in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or with brain injury (8 g/dL (7.0–9.0)). Platelets were transfused at a median count of 20 × 109 cells/L IQR (10–25) in asymptomatic patients, but at a higher count prior to invasive procedures (p < 0.001). In patients with an international normalized ratio (INR) > 3, 43% and 57% of the respondents would consider plasma transfusion without any upcoming procedures or prior to a planned invasive procedure, respectively. Finally, doctors with base specialty in anaesthesiology transfused critically ill patients more liberally compared to internal medicine physicians. Conclusion Red blood cell transfusion practice for the general ICU population is restrictive, while for different subpopulations, higher Hb thresholds are applied. Furthermore, practice in plasma and platelet transfusion is heterogeneous, and local transfusion guidelines are lacking in the majority of the ICUs.

Perfusion ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 39-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gennaro Martucci ◽  
Giacomo Grasselli ◽  
Kenichi Tanaka ◽  
Fabio Tuzzolino ◽  
Giovanna Panarello ◽  
...  

Introduction: Optimal red blood cell transfusion practice during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) is still under debate. This survey aimed to assess the Hb trigger (also comparing with other critically ill patients) and major physiologic determinants considered for transfusions during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Methods: Voluntary Web-based survey, endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, conducted among VV ECMO pratictioners worldwide. Results: A total of 447 respondents worldwide answered the questionnaire: 277 (61.9%) from Europe, 99 (22.1%) from North America, 36 (8.2%) from Asia and Oceania, and 35 (7.8%) from Central and South America. Among the respondents, 59.2% managed less than 12 venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation runs/year, 19.4% between 12 and 24 runs/year, and 21.4% more than 24 runs/year. Of the respondents, 54.4% do not use a predefined Hb trigger in veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and, while the rate of adoption of a defined trigger varied worldwide, the effective value of Hb did not differ significantly among macro-regions. In patients on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, the Hb trigger to initiate red blood cell transfusion, was higher than in other critically ill patients: 9.1 ± 1.8 g/dL versus 8.3 ± 1.7 g/dL, p < 0.01. The Hb trigger was lower in centers with more than 24 venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation runs/year (8.4 mg/dL (95% CI: 7.7-8.9)); (8.9 mg/dL (95% CI: 8.2-9.7)) in centers with between 12 and 24 venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation runs/year; and (9.6 mg/dL (95% CI: 9.1-10.0)) in centers with fewer than 12 venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation runs/year (p < 0.01). Several and variable adjunctive parameters are considered in cases of uncertainty for transfusion: the principal are hemodynamic status, SvO2, lactates, and fluid balance. Conclusion: Although the use of a predefined Hb trigger is still under-adopted among centers with low or median extracorporeal membrane oxygenation case volume, the majority of respondents use a higher Hb trigger for veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients compared with other critically ill patients. Higher volume centers tolerate lower Hb levels.


2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1079-1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth C. Parsons ◽  
Erin K. Kross ◽  
Naeem A. Ali ◽  
Lisa K. Vandevusse ◽  
Ellen S. Caldwell ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. A74
Author(s):  
Daniele M Torres ◽  
Rafael B Tomita ◽  
Maria Tereza M Ferrari ◽  
João M Silva ◽  
Luciano Sanches ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara Ann Collins

Anemia, which is prevalent in critically ill patients, often requires frequent blood transfusions. These blood transfusions are not without risks. A critical review of 6 studies shows an association between red blood cell transfusion and increased mortality. However, when disease state was adjusted for in 2 studies, researchers found that red blood cell transfusion correlated with decreased mortality. Thus further research, particularly on leukoreduction and age of stored blood, must be done before a change in practice can be implemented. It is vital that nurses stay current on this research in order to improve patients’ outcomes.


Critical Care ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P106 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Wilton ◽  
R Fowler ◽  
T Walsh ◽  
J Lacroix ◽  
J Callum

Transfusion ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Themelin ◽  
Patrick Biston ◽  
Jacqueline Massart ◽  
Christophe Lelubre ◽  
Michaël Piagnerelli

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document