scholarly journals Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of IC43 recombinant Pseudomonas aeruginosa vaccine in mechanically ventilated intensive care patients—a randomized clinical trial

Critical Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Adlbrecht ◽  
Raphael Wurm ◽  
Pieter Depuydt ◽  
Herbert Spapen ◽  
Jose A. Lorente ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Alireza Rahat-Dahmardeh ◽  
Sara Saneie-Moghadam ◽  
Masoum Khosh-Fetrat

Introduction. The gastric residual volume (GRV) monitoring in patients with mechanical ventilation (MV) is a common and important challenge. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of neostigmine and metoclopramide on GRV among MV patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods. In a double-blind randomized clinical trial, a total of 200 mechanically ventilated ICU patients with GRV > 120   ml (6 hours after the last gavage) were randomly assigned into two groups (A and B) with 100 patients in each group. Patients in groups A and B received intravenous infusion of neostigmine at a dose of 2.5 mg/100 ml normal saline and metoclopramide at a dose of 10 mg/100 ml normal saline, within 30 minutes, respectively. GRV was evaluated 5 times for each patient, once before the intervention and 4 times (at 3, 6, 9, and 12 hours) after the intervention. In addition, demographic characteristics including age and gender, as well as severity illness based on the sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA), were initially recorded for all patients. Results. After adjusting of demographic and clinical characteristics (age, gender, and SOFA score), the generalized estimating equation (GEE) model revealed that neostigmine treatment increased odds of GRV improvement compared to the metoclopramide group ( OR = 2.45 , 95% CI: 1.60-3.76, P < 0.001 ). However, there is a statistically significant time trend (within-subject differences or time effect) regardless of treatment groups ( P < 0.001 ). Conclusion. According to the results, although neostigmine treatment significantly improved GRV in more patients in less time, within 12 hours of treatment, all patients in both groups had complete recovery. Considering that there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of side effects, it seems that both drugs are effective in improving the GRV of ICU patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document