scholarly journals The effectiveness of attentional bias modification for substance use disorder symptoms in adults: a systematic review

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Janika Heitmann ◽  
Elise C. Bennik ◽  
Madelon E. van Hemel-Ruiter ◽  
Peter J. de Jong
CNS Spectrums ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matt Field ◽  
Reshmi Marhe ◽  
Ingmar H. A. Franken

Individuals with substance use disorders typically show an “attentional bias” for substance-related cues: Those cues are able to grab and hold the attention, in preference to other cues in the environment. We discuss the theoretical context for this work before reviewing the measurement of attentional bias, and its relationship to motivational state and relapse to substance use after a period of abstinence. Finally, we discuss the implications of this research for the treatment of substance use disorders. We conclude that attentional bias is associated with subjective craving, and that moment-by-moment fluctuations in attentional bias may precede relapse to substance use. The evidence regarding the predictive relationship between attentional bias assessed in treatment contexts and subsequent relapse is inconsistent. Furthermore, there is currently insufficient evidence to endorse attentional bias modification as a treatment for substance use disorders. Clinical implications and suggestions for future research are highlighted.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0252494
Author(s):  
Janika Heitmann ◽  
Madelon E. van Hemel-Ruiter ◽  
Mark Huisman ◽  
Brian D. Ostafin ◽  
Reinout W. Wiers ◽  
...  

Background Attentional bias for substance-relevant cues has been found to contribute to the persistence of addiction. Attentional bias modification (ABM) interventions might, therefore, increase positive treatment outcome and reduce relapse rates. The current study investigated the effectiveness of a newly developed home-delivered, multi-session, internet-based ABM intervention, the Bouncing Image Training Task (BITT), as an add-on to treatment as usual (TAU). Methods Participants (N = 169), diagnosed with alcohol or cannabis use disorder, were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: the experimental ABM group (50%; TAU+ABM); or the control group (50%; split in two subgroups the TAU+placebo group and TAU-only group, 25% each). Participants completed baseline, post-test, and 6 and 12 months follow-up measures of substance use and craving allowing to assess long-term treatment success and relapse rates. In addition, attentional bias (both engagement and disengagement), as well as secondary physical and psychological complaints (depression, anxiety, and stress) were assessed. Results No significant differences were found between conditions with regard to substance use, craving, relapse rates, attentional bias, or physical and psychological complaints. Conclusions The findings may reflect unsuccessful modification of attentional bias, the BITT not targeting the relevant process (engagement vs. disengagement bias), or may relate to the diverse treatment goals of the current sample (i.e., moderation or abstinence). The current findings provide no support for the efficacy of this ABM approach as an add-on to TAU in alcohol or cannabis use disorder. Future studies need to delineate the role of engagement and disengagement bias in the persistence of addiction, and the role of treatment goal in the effectiveness of ABM interventions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonore Bovy ◽  
Martin Möbius ◽  
Martin Dresler ◽  
Guillén Fernández ◽  
Alan Sanfey ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi Kakoschke ◽  
Eva Kemps ◽  
Marika Tiggemann

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. e20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wouter J Boendermaker ◽  
Soraya Sanchez Maceiras ◽  
Marilisa Boffo ◽  
Reinout W Wiers

2016 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick J.F. Clarke ◽  
Kristiina Bedford ◽  
Lies Notebaert ◽  
Romola S. Bucks ◽  
Daniel Rudaizky ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document