scholarly journals Current Approaches to the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Injury Risk Assessment and Performance Prediction in Team Sports: a Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
João Gustavo Claudino ◽  
Daniel de Oliveira Capanema ◽  
Thiago Vieira de Souza ◽  
Julio Cerca Serrão ◽  
Adriano C. Machado Pereira ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 2743-2774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan L. Fox ◽  
Robert Stanton ◽  
Charli Sargent ◽  
Sally-Anne Wintour ◽  
Aaron T. Scanlan

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (9) ◽  
pp. 1613-1635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renato Andrade ◽  
Eirik Halvorsen Wik ◽  
Alexandre Rebelo-Marques ◽  
Peter Blanch ◽  
Rodney Whiteley ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 20190107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuofeng Hung ◽  
Carla Montalvao ◽  
Ray Tanaka ◽  
Taisuke Kawai ◽  
Michael M. Bornstein

Objectives: To investigate the current clinical applications and diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence (AI) in dental and maxillofacial radiology (DMFR). Methods: Studies using applications related to DMFR to develop or implement AI models were sought by searching five electronic databases and four selected core journals in the field of DMFR. The customized assessment criteria based on QUADAS-2 were adapted for quality analysis of the studies included. Results: The initial electronic search yielded 1862 titles, and 50 studies were eventually included. Most studies focused on AI applications for an automated localization of cephalometric landmarks, diagnosis of osteoporosis, classification/segmentation of maxillofacial cysts and/or tumors, and identification of periodontitis/periapical disease. The performance of AI models varies among different algorithms. Conclusion: The AI models proposed in the studies included exhibited wide clinical applications in DMFR. Nevertheless, it is still necessary to further verify the reliability and applicability of the AI models prior to transferring these models into clinical practice.


2021 ◽  
pp. 594-617
Author(s):  
Amy O. Parkinson ◽  
Charlotte L. Apps ◽  
John G. Morris ◽  
Cleveland T. Barnett ◽  
Martin G. C. Lewis

The prevalence of inter-limb strength differences is well documented in the literature however, there are inconsistencies related to measurement and reporting, and the normative values and effects associated with inter-limb asymmetry. Therefore, the aims of this systematic review were to: 1) assess the appropriateness of existing indices for the calculation of asymmetry, 2) interrogate the evidence basis for literature reported thresholds used to define asymmetry and 3) summarise normative levels of inter-limb strength asymmetry and their effects on injury and performance. To conduct this systematic review, scientific databases (PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science) were searched and a total of 3,594 articles were retrieved and assessed for eligibility and article quality. The robustness of each identified asymmetry index was assessed, and the evidence-basis of the identified asymmetry thresholds was appraised retrospectively using the references provided. Fifty-three articles were included in this review. Only four of the twelve identified indices were unaffected by the limitations associated with selecting a reference limb. Eighteen articles applied a threshold to original research to identify “abnormal” asymmetry, fifteen of which utilised a threshold between 10-15%, yet this threshold was not always supported by appropriate evidence. Asymmetry scores ranged between and within populations from approximate symmetry to asymmetries larger than 15%. When reporting the effects of strength asymmetries, increased injury risk and detriments to performance were often associated with larger asymmetry, however the evidence was inconsistent. Limitations of asymmetry indices should be recognised, particularly those that require selection of a reference limb. Failure to reference the origin of the evidence for an asymmetry threshold reinforces doubt over the use of arbitrary thresholds, such as 10-15%. Therefore, an individual approach to defining asymmetry may be necessary to refine robust calculation methods and to establish appropriate thresholds across various samples and methodologies that enable appropriate conclusions to be drawn.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document