Nurse-Led Supportive Care Intervention for Men With Advanced Prostate Cancer: Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-43
Author(s):  
Nicholas Ralph ◽  
Suzanne Chambers ◽  
Kirstyn Laurie ◽  
John Oliffe ◽  
Mark Lazenby ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 223s-223s
Author(s):  
N. Ralph ◽  
S. Chambers ◽  
A. Pomery ◽  
J. Dunn

Background: Men with advanced prostate cancer can experience poor life quality and health outcomes compared with men with localized disease. Closely matching men's needs and identifying barriers and facilitators to implementation were critical first steps for ensuring the feasibility of our nurse-led telephone-based supportive care intervention for men with advanced prostate cancer. Aim: The aim of this study is to understand the context for implementing ProsCare from PCSNs, and in doing so, further develop the intervention and implementation strategy. Methods: A total of 30 Prostate Cancer Specialist Nurses (PCSNs) participated in 4 semistructured focus groups. Data were coded into the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to evaluate the ProsCare program content and guide the implementation and evaluation of this targeted program for men with advanced prostate cancer. Results: Participants validated ProsCare components of (1) decision support; (2) treatment education with self-management and skills training for symptom effects, including exercise prescription; (3) routine screening for psychological distress with referral; (4) psycho-education with tailored distress management strategies; and (5) communicating with health professionals. Data supported a revised treatment schedule and a comprehensive implementation plan including professional education and centralised administration. Conclusion: ProsCare is a valid supportive care nurse-led intervention. The CFIR framework is useful for the structured identification of implementation factors.


2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Carter ◽  
Denise Bryant-Lukosius ◽  
Alba DiCenso ◽  
Jennifer Blythe ◽  
Alan J. Neville

2020 ◽  
pp. 026921632095110
Author(s):  
Yakubu Salifu ◽  
Kathryn Almack ◽  
Glenys Caswell

Background: Family caregiving is common globally, but when a family member needs palliative and end-of-life care, this requires knowledge and expertise in dealing with symptoms, medication, and treatment side effects. Caring for a family member with advanced prostate cancer in the home presents practical and emotional challenges, especially in resource-poor contexts, where there are increasing palliative cases without adequate palliative care institutions. Aim: The study explored palliative and end-of-life care experiences of family caregivers and patients living at home in a resource-poor context in Ghana. Design: This is a qualitative study using thematic analysis of face-to-face interviews at two-time points. Participants: Men living with advanced prostate cancer ( n = 23), family caregivers ( n = 23), healthcare professionals ( n = 12). Findings: Men with advanced prostate cancer face complex issues, including lack of access to professional care and a lack of resources for homecare. Family caregivers do not have easy access to professional support; they often have limited knowledge of disease progression. Patients have inadequate access to medication and other practical resources for homecare. Caregivers may be overburdened and perform the role of the patient’s ‘doctor’ at home-assessing patient’s symptoms, administering drugs, and providing hands-on care. Conclusion: Home-based care is promoted as an ideal and cost-effective model of care, particularly in Westernised palliative care models. However, in resource-poor contexts, there are significant challenges associated with the implementation of this model. This study revealed the scale of challenges family caregivers, who lack basic training on aspects of caring, face in providing home care unsupported by healthcare professionals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document