ONS Guidelines™ for Cancer Treatment–Related Hot Flashes in Women With Breast Cancer and Men With Prostate Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 374-399
Author(s):  
Marcelle Kaplan ◽  
Pamela Ginex ◽  
Laura Michaud ◽  
Paz Fernández-Ortega ◽  
Dale Grimmer ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 256-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beverley de Valois ◽  
Teresa E. Young ◽  
Nicola Robinson ◽  
Christine McCourt ◽  
Elizabeth Jane Maher

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 4776-4785
Author(s):  
Julian Mangesius ◽  
Christoph Reinhold Arnold ◽  
Thomas Seppi ◽  
Stephanie Mangesius ◽  
Mario Brüggl ◽  
...  

The COVID-19 pandemic has an unprecedented impact on cancer treatment worldwide. We aimed to evaluate the effects of the pandemic on the radiation treatment of patients in order to provide data for future management of such crises. We compared the number of performed radiotherapy sessions of the pandemic period from February 2020 until May 2021 with those of 2018 and 2019 for reference. At our department, no referred patients had to be rejected or postponed, nor any significant changes in fractionation schedules implemented. Nevertheless, there was a substantial drop in overall radiotherapy sessions in 2020 following the first incidence wave of up to −25% (in June) in comparison to previous years. For breast cancer, a maximum decline of sessions of −45% (July) was recorded. Only a short drop of prostate cancer sessions (max −35%, May) followed by a rebound (+42%, July) was observed. Over the investigated period, a loss of 4.4% of expected patients never recovered. The severe impact of COVID-19 on cancer treatment, likely caused by retarded diagnosis and delayed interdisciplinary co-treatment, is reflected in a lower count of radiotherapy sessions. Radiation oncology is a crucial cornerstone in upholding both curative treatment options and treatment capacity during a pandemic.


2009 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. CMT.S2064
Author(s):  
Kouta Ito

Bone loss and its associated risk of fracture is a serious long-term health issue for breast cancer and prostate cancer survivors. Hormone ablation therapy, in particular aromatase inhibitors (AIs) for breast cancer and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer, causes marked reduction in circulating estrogen or testosterone levels, resulting in increased bone resorption, decreased bone mineral density (BMD), and an increased risk of fragility fracture. In several clinical trials with small sample sizes and short follow-up periods, oral and intravenous bisphosphonates have been shown to improve BMD, but not actual fracture rates, in cancer patients on hormone ablation therapy. A number of professional organizations and expert panels recommend the use of bisphosphonates for selected patients at risk. Although bisphosphonates are generally well tolerated, physicians should be aware of safety concerns, including the risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw. With the growing number of older breast and prostate cancer survivors, additional research is needed to characterize patients who would benefit from pharmacotherapy and optimize strategies to prevent cancer treatment-induced bone loss.


2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (06) ◽  
pp. 3-11

AUSTRALIA – Asian Mushrooms Could Help Fight Prostate Cancer AUSTRALIA – New Lung Cancer Treatment Discovered AUSTRALIA – Gene Behind Rare Brain Disorder Identified CHINA – China Bans Controversial Drug for Kids Below 12 INDIA – Ovarian Cancer Treated with Immunotherapy INDIA – Gene Card Tells What Drugs to Avoid INDIA – IISc, Deakin Join Hands to Fight Cancer with Nanotechnology INDIA – Indian Govt to Introduce First Five-in-One Vaccine SINGAPORE – New Test for Pain Tolerence SINGAPORE – NUS Best University for Medicine in Asia OTHER REGIONS — Implant Breakthrough Helps Paraplegic Man Stand Unaided OTHER REGIONS — Scientists Discover Protein that can Halt Spread of Breast Cancer


2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 687-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Hélène Savard ◽  
Josée Savard ◽  
Catherine Quesnel ◽  
Hans Ivers

Author(s):  
Alex H. Krist ◽  
Vivian Jiang

Cancer treatment is increasingly complex. The tools for diagnosis, staging, and predicting prognosis are rapidly evolving, as are the therapies, treatment modalities, and treatment protocols. The complexity of care, the need for a multidisciplinary team across settings, and patient-level factors all present providers with a unique set of challenges. The three case studies presented in this chapter explore strategies that help providers by (1) ensuring low-income patients with breast cancer receive care consistent with guidelines through patient engagement and navigation, (2) promoting and incorporating the routine use of shared decision-making in determining prostate cancer treatment, and (3) supporting the adoption of concurrent palliative care for patients with advanced cancer. The specific challenges and needs for future implementation science are highlighted throughout each case.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document