Large near‐surface velocity gradients on shallow seismic reflection data

Geophysics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 1348-1356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard D. Miller ◽  
Jianghai Xia

Extreme velocity gradients occasionally present within near‐surface materials can inhibit optimal common midpoint (CMP) stacking of near‐surface reflection arrivals. For example, abrupt increases in velocity are observed routinely at the bedrock surface and at the boundary between the vadose and the saturated zone. When a rapid increase in near‐surface velocity is found, NMO correction artifacts manifested on CMP gathers as sample reversion, sample compression, or duplication of reflection wavelets can reduce S/N ratio on stacked data or can stack coherently. Elimination of these nonstretch‐related artifacts using conventional NMO-stretch muting requires near‐vertically incident reflection arrivals and allowable stretch ratios as small as 5% in some shallow environments. Radical allowable stretch mutes are not a feasible means to subdue these artifacts if high‐amplitude coherent noise on near‐offset traces inhibits identification and digital enhancement of shallow reflections. On most shallow seismic reflection data, long‐offset reflection arrivals (but less than wide angle) are critical to the generation of an interpretable stacked section. The difference in offset between the optimum window for shallow reflections within unsaturated sediments and reflections from the underlying saturated or consolidated‐material portion of the section inherently limits the effectiveness of conventional NMO corrections. Near‐surface average velocity increases of 200% in less than two wavelengths and at two‐way traveltimes less than 60 ms are not uncommon on shallow reflection data. Near‐surface reflections separated by large velocity gradients can rarely be accurately or optimally CMP processed using conventional approaches to NMO corrections. Large velocity‐gradient shallow reflection data require segregation of shallow lower velocity reflections from higher velocity reflections during processing to maximize the accuracy and resolution potential of the stacked section, as shown by examples herein.

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. SH1-SH9
Author(s):  
Steven D. Sloan ◽  
J. Tyler Schwenk ◽  
Robert H. Stevens

Variability of material properties in the shallow subsurface presents challenges for near-surface geophysical methods and exploration-scale applications. As the depth of investigation decreases, denser sampling is required, especially of the near offsets, to accurately characterize the shallow subsurface. We have developed a field data example using high-resolution shallow seismic reflection data to demonstrate how quickly near-surface properties can change over short distances and the effects on field data and processed sections. The addition of a relatively thin, 20 cm thick, low-velocity layer can lead to masked reflections and an inability to map shallow reflectors. Short receiver intervals, on the order of 10 cm, were necessary to identify the cause of the diminished data quality and would have gone unknown using larger, more conventional station spacing. Combined analysis of first arrivals, surface waves, and reflections aided in determining the effects and extent of a low-velocity layer that inhibited the identification and constructive stacking of the reflection from a shallow water table using normal-moveout-based processing methods. Our results also highlight the benefits of using unprocessed gathers to pragmatically guide processing and interpretation of seismic data.


Geophysics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 1339-1347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate C. Miller ◽  
Steven H. Harder ◽  
Donald C. Adams ◽  
Terry O’Donnell

Shallow seismic reflection surveys commonly suffer from poor data quality in the upper 100 to 150 ms of the stacked seismic record because of shot‐associated noise, surface waves, and direct arrivals that obscure the reflected energy. Nevertheless, insight into lateral changes in shallow structure and stratigraphy can still be obtained from these data by using first‐arrival picks in a refraction analysis to derive a near‐surface velocity model. We have used turning‐ray tomography to model near‐surface velocities from seismic reflection profiles recorded in the Hueco Bolson of West Texas and southern New Mexico. The results of this analysis are interval‐velocity models for the upper 150 to 300 m of the seismic profiles which delineate geologic features that were not interpretable from the stacked records alone. In addition, the interval‐velocity models lead to improved time‐to‐depth conversion; when converted to stacking velocities, they may provide a better estimate of stacking velocities at early traveltimes than other methods.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven D. Sloan* ◽  
Matt Ralston ◽  
Robert H. Stevens ◽  
J. Tyler Schwenk

Geophysics ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 1528-1534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard D. Miller ◽  
Don W. Steeples ◽  
Michael Brannan

Shallow seismic‐reflection techniques were used to image the bedrock‐alluvial interface, near a chemical evaporation pond in the Texas Panhandle, allowing optimum placement of water‐quality monitor wells. The seismic data showed bedrock valleys as shallow as 4 m and accurate to within 1 m horizontally and vertically. The normal‐moveout velocity within the near‐surface alluvium varies from 225 m/s to 400 m/s. All monitor‐well borings near the evaporation pond penetrated unsaturated alluvial material. On most of the data, the wavelet reflected from the bedrock‐alluvium interface has a dominant frequency of around 170 Hz. Low‐cut filtering at 24 dB/octave below 220 Hz prior to analog‐to‐digital conversion enhanced the amplitude of the desired bedrock reflection relative to the amplitude of the unwanted ground roll. The final bedrock contour map derived from drilling and seismic‐reflection data possesses improved resolution and shows a bedrock valley not interpretable from drill data alone.


Geophysics ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 402-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross A. Black ◽  
Don W. Steeples ◽  
Richard D. Miller

We present an analysis of migration effects on seismic reflection images of very shallow targets such as those that are common objectives of engineering, groundwater, and environmental investigations. We use an example of seismic reflection data from depths of 5 to 15 m that show negligible effect from migration, despite the apparent steep dip on the seismic section. Our analysis of the question of when to migrate shallow reflection data indicates it is critical to take into account the highly variable near‐surface velocities and the vertical exaggeration on the seismic section. A simple set of calculations is developed as well as a flow chart based on the “migrator’s equation” that can predict whether migration of an arbitrary shallow seismic section is advisable. Because shallow reflection data are often processed on personal computers, unnecessary migration of a large data set can be prohibitively time‐consuming and wasteful.


Geophysics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 1395-1407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Büker ◽  
Alan G. Green ◽  
Heinrich Horstmeyer

Shallow seismic reflection data were recorded along two long (>1.6 km) intersecting profiles in the glaciated Suhre Valley of northern Switzerland. Appropriate choice of source and receiver parameters resulted in a high‐fold (36–48) data set with common midpoints every 1.25 m. As for many shallow seismic reflection data sets, upper portions of the shot gathers were contaminated with high‐amplitude, source‐generated noise (e.g., direct, refracted, guided, surface, and airwaves). Spectral balancing was effective in significantly increasing the strength of the reflected signals relative to the source‐generated noise, and application of carefully selected top mutes ensured guided phases were not misprocessed and misinterpreted as reflections. Resultant processed sections were characterized by distributions of distinct seismic reflection patterns or facies that were bounded by quasi‐continuous reflection zones. The uppermost reflection zone at 20 to 50 ms (∼15 to ∼40 m depth) originated from a boundary between glaciolacustrine clays/silts and underlying glacial sands/gravels (till) deposits. Of particular importance was the discovery that the deepest part of the valley floor appeared on the seismic section at traveltimes >180 ms (∼200 m), approximately twice as deep as expected. Constrained by information from boreholes adjacent to the profiles, the various seismic units were interpreted in terms of unconsolidated glacial, glaciofluvial, and glaciolacustrine sediments deposited during two principal phases of glaciation (Riss at >100 000 and Würm at ∼18 000 years before present).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document