Mimetic seismic wave modeling including topography on deformed staggered grids

Geophysics ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. T125-T141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josep de la Puente ◽  
Miguel Ferrer ◽  
Mauricio Hanzich ◽  
José E. Castillo ◽  
José M. Cela

Finite-difference methods for modeling seismic waves are known to be inaccurate when including a realistic topography, due to the large dispersion errors that appear in the modelled surface waves and the scattering introduced by the staircase approximation to the topography. As a consequence, alternatives to finite-difference methods have been proposed to circumvent these issues. We present a new numerical scheme for 3D elastic wave propagation in the presence of strong topography. This finite-difference scheme is based upon a staggered grid of the Lebedev type, or fully staggered grid (FSG). It uses a grid deformation strategy to make a regular Cartesian grid conform to a topographic surface. In addition, the scheme uses a mimetic approach to accurately solve the free-surface condition and hence allows for a less restrictive grid spacing criterion in the computations. The scheme can use high-order operators for the spatial derivatives and obtain low-dispersion results with as few as six points per minimum wavelength. A series of tests in 2D and 3D scenarios, in which our results are compared to analytical and numerical solutions obtained with other numerical approaches, validate the accuracy of our scheme. The resulting FSG mimetic scheme allows for accurate and efficient seismic wave modelling in the presence of very rough topographies with the advantage of using a structured staggered grid.

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuf Ucar ◽  
Nuri Murat Yagmurlu ◽  
Orkun Tasbozan

Abstract In this study, a numerical solution of the modified Burgers’ equation is obtained by the finite difference methods. For the solution process, two linearization techniques have been applied to get over the non-linear term existing in the equation. Then, some comparisons have been made between the obtained results and those available in the literature. Furthermore, the error norms L2 and L∞ are computed and found to be sufficiently small and compatible with others in the literature. The stability analysis of the linearized finite difference equations obtained by two different linearization techniques has been separately conducted via Fourier stability analysis method.


1977 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 769-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. E. Proctor

An extension is made of the α-effect model of the earth's dynamo into the nonlinear regime following the prescription of Malkus & Proctor (1975). In this model, the effects of small-scale dynamics on the α-effect are suppressed, and the global effects of induced velocity fields examined in isolation. The equations are solved numerically using finite-difference methods, and it is shown that viscous and inertial forces are unimportant in the final equilibration, as suggested in the above paper.


Author(s):  
Ding-Wen Deng ◽  
Zhu-An Wang

The numerical solutions of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) nonlinear viscous and nonviscous wave equations via the unified alternating direction implicit (ADI) finite difference methods (FDMs) are obtained in this paper. By making use of the discrete energy method, it is proven that their numerical solutions converge to exact solutions with an order of two in both time and space with respect to [Formula: see text]-norm. Numerical results confirm that they are relatively accurate and high-resolution, and more successfully simulate the conservation of the energy for nonviscous equations, and the dissipation of the energy for viscous equation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (Suppl. 1) ◽  
pp. 153-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dogan Kaya ◽  
Sema Gulbahar ◽  
Asıf Yokus

Non-linear terms of the time-fractional KdV-Burgers-Kuramoto equation are linearized using by some linearization techniques. Numerical solutions of this equation are obtained with the help of the finite difference methods. Numerical solutions and corresponding analytical solutions are compared. The L2 and L? error norms are computed. Stability of given method is investigated by using the Von Neumann stability analysis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 367-379
Author(s):  
Nayrouz Hilal ◽  
Sami Injrou ◽  
Ramez Karroum

Abstract This work presents two different finite difference methods to compute the numerical solutions for Newell–Whitehead–Segel partial differential equation, which are implicit exponential finite difference method and fully implicit exponential finite difference method. Implicit exponential methods lead to nonlinear systems. Newton method is used to solve the resulting systems. Stability and consistency are discussed. To illustrate the accuracy of the proposed numerical methods, some examples are delivered at the end.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document