A critical analysis on the uncertainty computation in ground-penetrating radar-retrieved dry snow parameters

Geophysics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. H39-H49
Author(s):  
Federico Di Paolo ◽  
Barbara Cosciotti ◽  
Sebastian E. Lauro ◽  
Elisabetta Mattei ◽  
Elena Pettinelli

The use of the ground-penetrating-radar (GPR) technique to estimate snow parameters such as thickness, density, and snow water equivalent (SWE) is particularly promising because it allows for surveying a large area in a relatively short amount of time. However, this application requires an accurate evaluation of the physical parameters retrieved from the radar measurements, which requires estimating each quantity involved in the computation along with its associated uncertainty. Conversely, the uncertainties are rarely reported in GPR snow studies, even if they represent essential information for data comparisons with other techniques such as the snow rod or snow pit methods. Snow parameters can be estimated from radar data as follows: The snow thickness can be computed from two-way traveltime if the snow average wave velocity is known; the snow density can be estimated from wave velocity using an appropriate mixing formula, and SWE can be computed once these two parameters have been calculated. Starting from published data, we have estimated the accuracy achievable by computing the overall uncertainty for each GPR-retrieved snow parameter and evaluated the influence of the different sources of uncertainties. The computation was made for three antenna frequencies (250, 500, and 1000 MHz) and various snow depths (0–5 m). We find that for snow thicknesses of less than 3 m, the main contribution to the uncertainties associated with snow parameters is given by the uncertainty on two-way traveltime estimation, especially for low antenna frequencies. However, for thicker snow depths, other factors such as the uncertainty on the antenna separation affect the overall accuracy and cannot be neglected. Our studies highlight the importance of the uncertaintiy assessment and suggest a rigorous way for their computation in the field of quantitative geophysics.

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (4B) ◽  
pp. 167-174
Author(s):  
Van Nguyen Thanh ◽  
Thuan Van Nguyen ◽  
Trung Hoai Dang ◽  
Triet Minh Vo ◽  
Lieu Nguyen Nhu Vo

Electromagnetic wave velocity is the most important parameter in processing ground penetrating radar data. Migration algorithm which heavily depends on wave velocity is used to concentrate scattered signals back to their correct locations. Depending wave velocity in urban area is not easy task by using traditional methods (i.e., common midpoint). We suggest using entropy and energy diagram as standard for achieving suitable velocity estimation. The results of one numerical model and areal data indicate that migrated section using accurate velocity has minimum entropy or maximum energy. From the interpretation, size and depth of anomalies are reliably identified.


Geophysics ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 1378-1385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingsheng Sun ◽  
Roger A. Young

Ground‐penetrating radar (GPR) data may show strong noise events as a result of scattering by surface objects on the ground or above the survey line. The relative strength of these events can be large in comparison to reflections from geologic features, because radar signals in the ground attenuate exponentially whereas signals that travel in the air attenuate geometrically. Migration of GPR field data from clastic and carbonate sequences in central Oklahoma distinguishes between scattered events and geologic events because the former are focused at the air‐wave velocity, while the latter are focused at the ground‐wave velocity. Forward modeling using locations of scatterers derived from migration confirms the presence of scattered events, and common midpoint (CMP) gathers are helpful in identifying surface scattering. Scattered events displayed at a horizontal/vertical scale of 1:1 are easily mistaken for subhorizontal, geologic reflections. Methods of recognizing scattered events and removing them, if possible, are therefore crucial to correct geological interpretation of GPR data.


PIERS Online ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 567-572
Author(s):  
Hui Zhou ◽  
Dongling Qiu ◽  
Takashi Takenaka

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Melchior Grab ◽  
Enrico Mattea ◽  
Andreas Bauder ◽  
Matthias Huss ◽  
Lasse Rabenstein ◽  
...  

Abstract Accurate knowledge of the ice thickness distribution and glacier bed topography is essential for predicting dynamic glacier changes and the future developments of downstream hydrology, which are impacting the energy sector, tourism industry and natural hazard management. Using AIR-ETH, a new helicopter-borne ground-penetrating radar (GPR) platform, we measured the ice thickness of all large and most medium-sized glaciers in the Swiss Alps during the years 2016–20. Most of these had either never or only partially been surveyed before. With this new dataset, 251 glaciers – making up 81% of the glacierized area – are now covered by GPR surveys. For obtaining a comprehensive estimate of the overall glacier ice volume, ice thickness distribution and glacier bed topography, we combined this large amount of data with two independent modeling algorithms. This resulted in new maps of the glacier bed topography with unprecedented accuracy. The total glacier volume in the Swiss Alps was determined to be 58.7 ± 2.5 km3 in the year 2016. By projecting these results based on mass-balance data, we estimated a total ice volume of 52.9 ± 2.7 km3 for the year 2020. Data and modeling results are accessible in the form of the SwissGlacierThickness-R2020 data package.


Data in Brief ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 1588-1593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted L Gragson ◽  
Victor D. Thompson ◽  
David S. Leigh ◽  
Florent Hautefeuille

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document