scholarly journals Wave-equation time migration

Geophysics ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-58
Author(s):  
Sergey Fomel ◽  
Harpreet Kaur

Time migration, as opposed to depth migration, suffers from two well-known shortcomings: (1)approximate equations are used for computing Green’s functions inside the imaging operator; (2) in case of lateral velocity variations, the transformation between the image ray coordinates andthe Cartesian coordinates is undefined in places where the image rays cross. We show that thefirst limitation can be removed entirely by formulating time migration through wave propagationin image-ray coordinates. The proposed approach constructs a time-migrated image without relyingon any kind of traveltime approximation by formulating an appropriate geometrically accurateacoustic wave equation in the time-migration domain. The advantage of this approach is that thepropagation velocity in image-ray coordinates does not require expensive model building and canbe approximated by quantities that are estimated in conventional time-domain processing. Synthetic and field data examples demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach and show that theproposed imaging workflow leads to a significant uplift in terms of image quality and can bridge thegap between time and depth migrations. The image obtained by the proposed algorithm is correctlyfocused and mapped to depth coordinates it is comparable to the image obtained by depth migration.

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. T1-T13
Author(s):  
Bin Lyu ◽  
Qin Su ◽  
Kurt J. Marfurt

Although the structures associated with overthrust terrains form important targets in many basins, accurately imaging remains challenging. Steep dips and strong lateral velocity variations associated with these complex structures require prestack depth migration instead of simpler time migration. The associated rough topography, coupled with older, more indurated, and thus high-velocity rocks near or outcropping at the surface often lead to seismic data that suffer from severe statics problems, strong head waves, and backscattered energy from the shallow section, giving rise to a low signal-to-noise ratio that increases the difficulties in building an accurate velocity model for subsequent depth migration. We applied a multidomain cascaded noise attenuation workflow to suppress much of the linear noise. Strong lateral velocity variations occur not only at depth but near the surface as well, distorting the reflections and degrading all deeper images. Conventional elevation corrections followed by refraction statics methods fail in these areas due to poor data quality and the absence of a continuous refracting surface. Although a seismically derived tomographic solution provides an improved image, constraining the solution to the near-surface depth-domain interval velocities measured along the surface outcrop data provides further improvement. Although a one-way wave-equation migration algorithm accounts for the strong lateral velocity variations and complicated structures at depth, modifying the algorithm to account for lateral variation in illumination caused by the irregular topography significantly improves the image, preserving the subsurface amplitude variations. We believe that our step-by-step workflow of addressing the data quality, velocity model building, and seismic imaging developed for the Tuha Basin of China can be applied to other overthrust plays in other parts of the world.


Geophysics ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. S81-S93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail M. Popov ◽  
Nikolay M. Semtchenok ◽  
Peter M. Popov ◽  
Arie R. Verdel

Seismic depth migration aims to produce an image of seismic reflection interfaces. Ray methods are suitable for subsurface target-oriented imaging and are less costly compared to two-way wave-equation-based migration, but break down in cases when a complex velocity structure gives rise to the appearance of caustics. Ray methods also have difficulties in correctly handling the different branches of the wavefront that result from wave propagation through a caustic. On the other hand, migration methods based on the two-way wave equation, referred to as reverse-time migration, are known to be capable of dealing with these problems. However, they are very expensive, especially in the 3D case. It can be prohibitive if many iterations are needed, such as for velocity-model building. Our method relies on the calculation of the Green functions for the classical wave equation by per-forming a summation of Gaussian beams for the direct and back-propagated wavefields. The subsurface image is obtained by cal-culating the coherence between the direct and backpropagated wavefields. To a large extent, our method combines the advantages of the high computational speed of ray-based migration with the high accuracy of reverse-time wave-equation migration because it can overcome problems with caustics, handle all arrivals, yield good images of steep flanks, and is readily extendible to target-oriented implementation. We have demonstrated the quality of our method with several state-of-the-art benchmark subsurface models, which have velocity variations up to a high degree of complexity. Our algorithm is especially suited for efficient imaging of selected subsurface subdomains, which is a large advantage particularly for 3D imaging and velocity-model refinement applications such as subsalt velocity-model improvement. Because our method is also capable of providing highly accurate migration results in structurally complex subsurface settings, we have also included the concept of true-amplitude imaging in our migration technique.


Geophysics ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Dickinson

The theoretically correct way to perform a three‐dimensional (3-D) migration of seismic data requires large amounts of data manipulation on the computer. In order to alleviate this problem, a true, one‐pass 3-D migration is commonly replaced with an approximate technique in which a series of two‐dimensional (2-D) migrations is performed in orthogonal directions. This two‐pass algorithm produces the correct answer when the velocity is constant, both horizontally and vertically. Here I analyze the error due to this algorithm when the velocities vary vertically. The analysis has two parts: first, a theoretical analysis is performed in which a formula for the error is derived; and second, a field data comparison between one‐pass and two‐pass migrations is shown. My conclusion is that two‐pass 3-D migration is, in general, a very good approximation. Its errors are usually small, the exceptions being when both the reflector dip is large (in practice this typically means greater than about 25 to 40 degrees) and the orientation of the reflector is in neither the inline nor the crossline direction. Even then the error is the same order of magnitude as that due to the uncertainty in the migration velocities. These conclusions are still valid when there is lateral velocity variation, as long as this variation is accounted for by trace stretching. The analysis presented here deals with time migration; no claims are made regarding depth migration.


Geophysics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 546-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herman Chang ◽  
John P. VanDyke ◽  
Marcelo Solano ◽  
George A. McMechan ◽  
Duryodhan Epili

Portable, production‐scale 3-D prestack Kirchhoff depth migration software capable of full‐volume imaging has been successfully implemented and applied to a six‐million trace (46.9 Gbyte) marine data set from a salt/subsalt play in the Gulf of Mexico. Velocity model building and updates use an image‐driven strategy and were performed in a Sun Sparc environment. Images obtained by 3-D prestack migration after three velocity iterations are substantially better focused and reveal drilling targets that were not visible in images obtained from conventional 3-D poststack time migration. Amplitudes are well preserved, so anomalies associated with known reservoirs conform to the petrophysical predictions. Prototype development was on an 8-node Intel iPSC860 computer; the production version was run on an 1824-node Intel Paragon computer. The code has been successfully ported to CRAY (T3D) and Unix workstation (PVM) environments.


Geophysics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 246-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oong K. Youn ◽  
Hua‐wei Zhou

Depth imaging with multiples is a prestack depth migration method that uses multiples as the signal for more accurate boundary mapping and amplitude recovery. The idea is partially related to model‐based multiple‐suppression techniques and reverse‐time depth migration. Conventional reverse‐time migration uses the two‐way wave equation for the backward wave propagation of recorded seismic traces and ray tracing or the eikonal equation for the forward traveltime computation (the excitation‐time imaging principle). Consequently, reverse‐time migration differs little from most other one‐way wave equation or ray‐tracing migration methods which expect only primary reflection events. Because it is almost impossible to attenuate multiples without degrading primaries, there has been a compelling need to devise a tool to use multiples constructively in data processing rather than attempting to destroy them. Furthermore, multiples and other nonreflecting wave types can enhance boundary imaging and amplitude recovery if a full two‐way wave equation is used for migration. The new approach solves the two‐way wave equation for both forward and backward directions of wave propagation using a finite‐difference technique. Thus, it handles all types of acoustic waves such as reflection (primary and multiples), refraction, diffraction, transmission, and any combination of these waves. During the imaging process, all these different types of wavefields collapse at the boundaries where they are generated or altered. The process goes through four main steps. First, a source function (wavelet) marches forward using the full two‐way scalar wave equation from a source location toward all directions. Second, the recorded traces in a shot gather march backward using the full two‐way scalar wave equation from all receiver points in the gather toward all directions. Third, the two forward‐ and backward‐propagated wavefields are correlated and summed for all time indices. And fourth, a Laplacian image reconstruction operator is applied to the correlated image frame. This technique can be applied to all types of seismic data: surface seismic, vertical seismic profile (VSP), crosswell seismic, vertical cable seismic, ocean‐bottom cable (OBC) seismic, etc. Because it migrates all wave types, the input data require no or minimal preprocessing (demultiple should not be done, but near‐surface or acquisition‐related problems might need to be corrected). Hence, it is only a one‐step process from the raw field gathers to a final depth image. External noise in the raw data will not correlate with the forward wavefield except for some coincidental matching; therefore, it is usually unnecessary to do signal enhancement processing before the depth imaging with multiples. The input velocity model could be acquired from various methods such as iterative focusing analysis or tomography, as in other prestack depth migration methods. The new method has been applied to data sets from a simple multiple‐generating model, the Marmousi model, and a real offset VSP. The results show accurate imaging of primaries and multiples with overall significant improvements over conventionally imaged sections.


Geophysics ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 60 (6) ◽  
pp. 1947-1947 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur E. Barnes

I appreciate the thoughtful and thorough response given by Tygel et al. They point out that even for a single dipping reflector imaged by a single non‐zero offset raypath, pulse distortion caused by “standard processing” (NM0 correction‐CMP sort‐stack‐time migration) and pulse distortion caused by prestack depth migration are not really the same, because the reflecting point is mispositioned in standard processing. Within a CMP gather, this mispositioning increases with offset, giving rise to “CMP smear.” CMP smear degrades the stack, introducing additional pulse distortion. Where i‐t is significant, and where lateral velocity variations or reflection curvature are large, such as for complex geology, the pulse distortion of standard processing can differ greatly from that of prestack depth migration.


Geophysics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 568-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young C. Kim ◽  
Worth B. Hurt, ◽  
Louis J. Maher ◽  
Patrick J. Starich

The transformation of surface seismic data into a subsurface image can be separated into two components—focusing and positioning. Focusing is associated with ensuring the data from different offsets are contributing constructively to the same event. Positioning involves the transformation of the focused events into a depth image consistent with a given velocity model. In prestack depth migration, both of these operations are achieved simultaneously; however, for 3-D data, the cost is significant. Prestack time migration is much more economical and focuses events well even in the presence of moderate velocity variations, but suffers from mispositioning problems. Hybrid migration is a cost‐effective depth‐imaging approach that uses prestack time migration for focusing; inverse migration for the removal of positioning errors; and poststack depth migration for proper positioning. When lateral velocity changes are moderate, the hybrid technique can generate a depth image that is consistent with a velocity field. For very complex structures that require prestack depth migration, the results of the hybrid technique can be used to create a starting velocity model, thereby reducing the number of iterations for velocity model building.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. SN25-SN32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Wang ◽  
Shouting Huang ◽  
Ming Wang

Complex overburdens often distort reservoir images in terms of structural positioning, stratigraphic resolution, and amplitude fidelity. One prime example of a complex overburden is in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico, where thick and irregular layers of remobilized (i.e., allochthonous) salt are situated above prospective reservoir intervals. The highly variant salt layers create large lateral velocity variations that distort wave propagation and the illumination of deeper reservoir targets. In subsalt imaging, tools such as reflection tomography, full-waveform inversion, and detailed salt interpretation are needed to derive a high-resolution velocity model that captures the lateral velocity variations. Once a velocity field is obtained, reverse time migration (RTM) can be applied to restore structural positioning of events below and around the salt. However, RTM by nature is unable to fully recover the reflectivity for desired amplitudes and resolution. This shortcoming is well-recognized by the imaging community, and it has propelled the emergence of least-squares RTM (LSRTM) in recent years. We have investigated how current LSRTM methods perform on subsalt images. First, we compared the formulation of data-domain versus image-domain least-squares migration, as well as methods using single-iteration approximation versus iterative inversion. Then, we examined the resulting subsalt images of several LSRTM methods applied on the synthetic and field data. Among our tests, we found that image-domain single-iteration LSRTM methods, including an extension of an approximate inverse Hessian method in the curvelet domain, not only compensated for amplitude loss due to poor illumination caused by complex salt bodies, but it also produced subsalt images with fewer migration artifacts in the field data. In contrast, an iterative inversion method showed its potential for broadening the bandwidth in the subsalt, but it was less effective in reducing migration artifacts and noise. Based on our understanding, we evaluated the current state of LSRTM for subsalt imaging.


Geophysics ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. VE211-VE216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacobus Buur ◽  
Thomas Kühnel

Many production targets in greenfield exploration are found in salt provinces, which have highly complex structures as a result of salt formation over geologic time. Difficult geologic settings, steep dips, and other wave-propagation effects make reverse-time migration (RTM) the migration method of choice, rather than Kirchhoff migration or other (by definition approximate) one-way equation methods. Imaging of the subsurface using any depth-migration algorithm can be done successfully only when the quality of the prior velocity model is sufficient. The (velocity) model-building loop is an iterative procedure for improving the velocity model. This is done by obtaining certain measurements (residual moveout) on image gathers generated during the migration procedure; those measurements then are input into tomographic updating. Commonly RTM is applied around salt bodies, where building the velocity model fails essentially because tomography is ray-trace based. Our idea is to apply RTM directly inside the model-building loop but to do so without using the image gathers. Although the process is costly, we migrate the full frequency content of the data to create a high-quality stack. This enhances the interpretation of top and bottom salt significantly and enables us to include the resulting salt geometry in the velocity model properly. We demonstrate our idea on a 2D West Africa seismic line. After several model-building iterations, the result is a dramatically improved velocity model. With such a good model as input, the final RTM confirms the geometry of the salt bodies and basically the salt interpretation, and yields a compelling image of the subsurface.


Geophysics ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 393-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walt Lynn ◽  
Scott MacKay ◽  
Craig J. Beasley

An efficient means of imaging structures beneath complex water‐bottom topography is obtained using a conventional time‐migration algorithm with a simple modification to the migration‐velocity field. The process consists of two migration steps: one with the migration velocity set to zero below the water bottom and the other with the migration velocity set to zero above the water bottom. Between the two steps the data are vertically time shifted to account for the lateral velocity variations between the water‐sediment interface. The time shifts used are equivalent to the so‐called “thin‐lens” term used in depth‐migration algorithms. Efficiency is obtained by applying the thin‐lens term only once and by using computationally optimized time‐migration algorithms. Results obtained from this technique are nearly identical to more costly wave‐equation, layer‐replacement, and depth‐migration techniques.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document