scholarly journals Unsupervised seismic facies using Gaussian mixture models

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. SE93-SE111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley C. Wallet ◽  
Robert Hardisty

As the use of seismic attributes becomes more widespread, multivariate seismic analysis has become more commonplace for seismic facies analysis. Unsupervised machine-learning techniques provide methods of automatically finding patterns in data with minimal user interaction. When using unsupervised machine-learning techniques, such as [Formula: see text]-means or Kohonen self-organizing maps (SOMs), the number of clusters can often be ambiguously defined and there is no measure of how confident the algorithm is in the classification of data vectors. The model-based probabilistic formulation of Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) allows for the number and shape of clusters to be determined in a more objective manner using a Bayesian framework that considers a model’s likelihood and complexity. Furthermore, the development of alternative expectation-maximization (EM) algorithms has allowed GMMs to be more tailored to unsupervised seismic facies analysis. The classification EM algorithm classifies data vectors according to their posterior probabilities that provide a measurement of uncertainty and ambiguity (often called a soft classification). The neighborhood EM (NEM) algorithm allows for spatial correlations to be considered to make classification volumes more realistic by enforcing spatial continuity. Corendering the classification with the uncertainty and ambiguity measurements produces an intuitive map of unsupervised seismic facies. We apply a model-based classification approach using GMMs to a turbidite system in Canterbury Basin, New Zealand, to clarify results from an initial SOM and highlight areas of uncertainty and ambiguity. Special focus on a channel feature in the turbidite system using an NEM algorithm shows it to be more realistic by considering spatial correlations within the data.

Geophysics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. O83-O95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thilo Wrona ◽  
Indranil Pan ◽  
Robert L. Gawthorpe ◽  
Haakon Fossen

Seismic interpretations are, by definition, subjective and often require significant time and expertise from the interpreter. We are convinced that machine-learning techniques can help address these problems by performing seismic facies analyses in a rigorous, repeatable way. For this purpose, we use state-of-the-art 3D broadband seismic reflection data of the northern North Sea. Our workflow includes five basic steps. First, we extract seismic attributes to highlight features in the data. Second, we perform a manual seismic facies classification on 10,000 examples. Third, we use some of these examples to train a range of models to predict seismic facies. Fourth, we analyze the performance of these models on the remaining examples. Fifth, we select the “best” model (i.e., highest accuracy) and apply it to a seismic section. As such, we highlight that machine-learning techniques can increase the efficiency of seismic facies analyses.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Auste Kanapeckaite

Lack of bioinformatics tools to quickly assess protein conformational and topological features motivated to create an integrative and user-friendly R package. Moreover,Fiscore package implements a pipeline for Gaussian mixture modelling making such machine learning techniques readily accessible to non-experts. This is especially important since probabilistic machine learning techniques can help with a better interpretation of complex biological phenomena when it is necessary to elucidate various structural features that might play a role in protein function. Thus,Fiscore package builds on the mathematical formulation of protein physicochemical properties that can aid in drug discovery, target evaluation, or relational database building. Moreover, the package provides interactive environments to explore various features of interest. Finally, one of the goals of this package was to engage structural bioinformaticians and develop more R tools that could help researchers not necessarily specialising in this field. Package Fiscore(v.0.1.2) is distributed via CRAN and Github.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Schreiner ◽  
Kari Torkkola ◽  
Mike Gardner ◽  
Keshu Zhang

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-99
Author(s):  
Li-Pang Chen

In this paper, we investigate analysis and prediction of the time-dependent data. We focus our attention on four different stocks are selected from Yahoo Finance historical database. To build up models and predict the future stock price, we consider three different machine learning techniques including Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Support Vector Regression (SVR). By treating close price, open price, daily low, daily high, adjusted close price, and volume of trades as predictors in machine learning methods, it can be shown that the prediction accuracy is improved.


Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 389-P
Author(s):  
SATORU KODAMA ◽  
MAYUKO H. YAMADA ◽  
YUTA YAGUCHI ◽  
MASARU KITAZAWA ◽  
MASANORI KANEKO ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document